Skip to content

· Public charity

National Council for Occupational Safety & Health

To promote safe and healthy working conditions for all working people in the united states.

$163k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$41k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Employment$1.4MCivil Rights$220kHousing & Shelter$34kArts & Culture$32kEducation$28kCommunity Improvement$18kHealth$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $148,098, the rows itemized in this filing. The $162,956 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $14,858 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $142k
$12,677
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BORDER WORKERS UNITED$41,361
WE COUNT$39,875
MISSISSIPPI WORKER CENTER$25,985
NORTHWEST WORKERS' JUSTICE PROJECT$12,677
Individual grant recipient$11,250
WORKSAFE$10,450
FE Y JUSTICIA WORKERS CTR$6,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 75% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MA COALITION FOR COSH: $32k → 16%PHILADELPHIA PROJECT COSH: $45k → 22%WORKSAFE: $26k → 10%SOUTHERN CA COSH: $25k → 14%WESTERN NEW YORK COSH: $32k → 13%NENY COSH: $29k → 14%MID-STATE COSH: $30k → 16%NY COSH: $28k → 17%FE Y JUSTICIA WORKERS CENTER: $43k → 16%BORDER WORKERS UNITED: $57k → 21%WE COUNT: $46k → 15%NORTHWEST WORKERS' JUSTICE PROJECT: $27k → 12%CONNECTICUT COSH: $33k → 11%WORKERS DIGNITY: $30k → 14%WESTERN NC COSH: $71k → 8%RHODE ISLAND COSH: $25k → 14%CINCINNATI INTERFAITH WORKERS CTR: $26k → 16%MISSISSIPPI WORKER CENTER: $51k → 27%NEW JERSEY WORK ENV COUNCIL: $27k → 11%NEW HAMPSHIRE COSH: $28k → 7%MA COALITION FOR COSH: $28k → 16%PHILADELPHIA PROJECT COSH: $34k → 22%WORKSAFE: $25k → 10%SOUTHERN CA COSH: $21k → 14%WESTERN NEW YORK COSH: $23k → 13%NENY COSH: $29k → 14%MID-STATE EDUCATION AND SERVICES: $28k → 16%FE Y JUSTICIA WORKERS CENTER: $27k → 16%BORDER WORKERS UNITED: $41k → 21%WE COUNT: $40k → 15%NORTHWEST WORKERS' JUSTICE PROJECT: $21k → 12%CONNECTICUT COSH: $29k → 11%WORKERS DIGNITY: $30k → 14%WESTERN NC COSH: $33k → 8%MISSISSIPPI WORKER CENTER: $31k → 27%MA COALITION FOR COSH: $26k → 16%PHILADELPHIA PROJECT COSH: $31k → 22%NYCOSH: $25k → 17%BORDER WORKERS UNITED: $30k → 21%WE COUNT: $33k → 15%CONNECTICUT COSH: $21k → 11%MISSISSIPPI WORKER CENTER: $27k → 27%BORDER WORKERS UNITED: $25k → 21%WE COUNT: $33k → 15%MISSISSIPPI WORKER CENTER: $26k → 27%BORDER WORKERS UNITED: $24k → 21%WE COUNT: $30k → 15%SO FL IWJ: $24k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
WI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
AR
TN
NC
MS
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 21 repeat orgs$163k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +100% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
9

Total granted

$1.9M
$163k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+100%
+18%

Still filing today

29%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Civil RightsEducationHealthEmploymentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • W
    WECOUNT
    5× · 2021–2025 · $182k · revenue +100%
  • BW
    BORDER WORKERS UNITED
    5× · 2021–2025 · $177k · revenue +358%
  • WI
    Worksafe Inc
    5× · 2017–2025 · $88k · revenue +183%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $28k
  • ME
    MID-STATE EDUCATION AND SERVICES
    one grant, 2017 · $28k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Warehouse Workers Justice Center Inc

Warehouse Workers for Justice is a worker center fighting for stable, living-wage jobs in warehouses and distribution centers. We educate workers about labor rights, teach folks how to enforce their rights, organize in the workplace and…

Crime & Legal
2
Fair Work Center

We are workers, united across different industries to improve our working conditions and our lives. We come together as working people to build power through education, organizing, and enforcement. We work to raise and uphold standards in…

Employment
3
Lynn Worker Center Inc

Provide know your rights traini

Human Services
4
Working Washington

We are workers, united across different industries to improve our working conditions and our lives. We come together as working people to build power through education, organizing, and enforcement. We work to raise and uphold standards in…

—
5
Young Workers United

Educate/Advocate for historically marginalized groups.

—
6
New York Committee for Occupational Safety and Health Inc

The New York Committee for Occupational Safety and Health (NYCOSH) is a membership organization of workers, unions, community-based organizations, workers' rights activists, and health and safety professionals. NYCOSH uses training,…

—
7
Center for Worker Justice of Eastern Iowa

CWJ is organized around the following priority issues: workers rights to proper payment and safe work, protecting/improving housing options, ensuring equal access to community services for all residents, and empowering assistance to those…

—
8
Fuerza LaboralPower of Workers

Fuerza Laboral is a workers' rights center whose mission is to shift the balance of power in our economy in favor of workers by educating, training, and organizing workers to become community leaders; taking direct action to recover unpaid…

Education
9
Central Ohio Workers Center Inc

The Central Ohio Worker Center is a non-profit organization that educates, empowers, and advocates for and with low-wage and immigrant workers in Central Ohio.

Civil Rights
10
Northwest Forest Worker Center

Northwest Forest Worker Center is a nonprofit organization that empowers forest workers and harvesters of non-timber forest products (mushrooms, berries, floral greens, etc.) in northern California, Oregon and Washington to improve their…

—
11
Center for Workers' Rights

The center for workers' rights strives to improve working conditions, reduce barriers to securing employment, and remedy workplace injustices for low wage workers in the greater sacramento area.

Employment
12
Workers' Center of Central New York Inc

Grassroots Organization focused on workplace and economic justice. Through policy advocacy, leadership development, organizing, and popular education, they support and empower low-wage workers from all backgrounds to combat workplace…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cincinnati Interfaith Workers Cente; the most unlike its peers is Maine Labor Group on Health. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BORDER WORKERS UNITED: $177,344 · OtherBORDER WORKERS UNITEDMISSISSIPPI WORKER CENTER: $157,725 · OtherMISSISSIPPI WORKER CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $152,358 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPHILADELPHIA PROJECT COSH: $119,916 · OtherPHILADELPHIA PROJECT COSHWorksafe Inc: $88,367 · OtherWorksafe IncIndividual grant recipient: $87,765 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMA COALITION FOR COSH: $86,451 · OtherMA COALITION FOR COSHIndividual grant recipient: $82,930 · OtherWESTERN NEW YORK COSH: $80,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $78,653 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $66,425 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $59,850 · Other+11 more: $300,034 · Other+11 moreWECOUNT: $181,674 · Civil RightsWECOUNTFE Y JUSTICIA WORKER CENTER: $135,828 · Civil RightsFE Y JUSTICIA WOR…NWJP Action Fund: $109,222 · EmploymentCINCINNATI INTERFAITH WORKERS CENTE: $46,356 · EducationMaine Labor Group on Health: $18,088 · HealthCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $18,080 · Community Improvement
Other$1,598,068Civil Rights$317,502Employment$109,222Education$46,356Health$18,088Community Improvement$18,080

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWECOUNT: $181,674 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetBORDER WORKERS UNITED: $177,344 over 5y, 19% of budgetFE Y JUSTICIA WORKER CENTER: $135,828 over 7y, 6.6% of budgetNWJP Action Fund: $109,222 over 8y, 84% of budgetWorksafe Inc: $88,367 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetCINCINNATI INTERFAITH WORKERS CENTE: $46,356 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetMaine Labor Group on Health: $18,088 over 1y, 39% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $18,080 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WECOUNT ↗
  • Who funds BORDER WORKERS UNITED ↗
  • Who funds FE Y JUSTICIA WORKER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NWJP Action Fund ↗
  • Who funds Worksafe Inc ↗
  • Who funds CINCINNATI INTERFAITH WORKERS CENTE ↗
  • Who funds Maine Labor Group on Health ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds WISCOSH INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Council for Occupational Safety & Health funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Council for Occupational Safety & Health. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on National Council for Occupational Safety & Health’s filings →

    More from the funding graph