Skip to content
National Cancer Center Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

National Cancer Center Inc

National cancer center (ncc) founded by dr.

$788k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$284k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$3.2MEducation$540kHuman Services$154k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $42k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $464k
  • $250k+1 grant · $284k
$60,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute$284,000
The Rockefeller University$120,000
Johns Hopkins University$112,000
The Trustees Of Columbia University$60,000
Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope$60,000
Massachusetts Institute of Technology$60,000
Cleveland Clinic Foundation$52,000
President and Fellows of Harvard College$42,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 81% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Massachusetts Institute of Technology: $60k → 8%DANA FABER CANCER INSTITUTE: $42k → 16%University of Pittsburgh: $52k → 11%THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $80k → 22%UCSF School of Medicine: $52k → 10%SALK INST BIOLOGICAL STUDY: $42k → 11%REGENTS OF THE UNIV OF CA LA: $84k → 14%NYU Langone Health: $200k → 17%Baylor College of Medicine: $52k → 16%DUKE UNIV MEDICAL CENTER: $72k → 11%REGENTS OF THE UNIV COLORADO: $42k → 12%Johns Hopkins University: $112k → 19%President and Fellows of Harvard College: $42k → 8%BOSTON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $40k → 16%University of Pittsburgh School Med: $52k → 11%THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $42k → 22%SALK INST BIOLOGICAL STUDY: $42k → 11%David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA: $52k → 14%NYU School of Medicine: $102k → 17%Baylor College of Medicine: $52k → 16%DUKE UNIV MEDICAL CENTER: $42k → 11%John Hopkins Medical School: $52k → 19%Dana-Farber Cancer Institute: $284k → 16%UNIV OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL MED: $40k → 11%THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $40k → 22%UCLA DIVISION OF DERMATOLOGY: $42k → 14%NYU Medical Center: $52k → 17%DUKE UNIV MEDICAL CENTER: $40k → 11%Johns Hopkins University: $52k → 19%Dana-Farber Cancer Institute: $254k → 16%UNIV OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL MED: $40k → 11%Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope: $60k → 14%NYU: $51k → 17%DUKE UNIV MEDICAL CENTER: $40k → 11%Dana-Farber Cancer Institute: $52k → 16%NYU School of Medicine: $51k → 17%DUKE UNIV MEDICAL CENTER: $40k → 11%MASS GEN HOSPITAL CANCER CTR: $42k → 16%NYU SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $42k → 17%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $42k → 16%NYU LANGONE HEALTH: $42k → 17%NYU SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $42k → 17%The Trustees Of Columbia University: $60k → 17%The Rockefeller University: $120k → 17%WEILL CORNELL COLLEGE CORNELL: $82k → 17%THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $50k → 17%WEILL CORNELL COLLEGE CORNELL: $42k → 17%ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $82k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OH
PA
CA
CO
NE
MD
NC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.4M · 15 repeat orgs$392k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
6

Total granted

$3.4M
$332k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+91%

Still filing today

67%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’23’24’25
EducationHealthScience & TechHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NY
    New York University
    6× · 2017–2024 · $307k · revenue +76%
  • CN
    Charity Navigator
    3× · 2023–2025 · $256k · revenue +80%
  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2018–2020 · $234k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
    one grant, 2019 · $84k
  • TS
    The Salk Institute for Biological Studies
    one grant, 2020 · $84k · revenue +8%
  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO
    one grant, 2020 · $42k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
2
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
3
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
4
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
5
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
6
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
7
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
8
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
9
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
10
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
11
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
12
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Johns Hopkins University; the most unlike its peers is Charity Navigator. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute: $674,000 · OtherDana-Farber Cancer InstituteUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $248,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCOUPMC: $184,000 · OtherUPMCWeill Medical College of Cornell Univers: $164,000 · OtherWeill Medical College of Cornell UniversREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA: $94,000 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIAREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $84,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA+3 more: $124,000 · Other+3 moreNew York University: $307,000 · EducationNew York UniversityDUKE UNIVERSITY: $234,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $216,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $210,000 · EducationTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITYPHILADELPHIA UNIVERSITY: $162,000 · EducationPHILADELPHIA UNIVERSITYICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $122,000 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAIBaylor College of Medicine: $104,000 · EducationBaylor College of MedicineMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $60,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $60,000 · Education+1 more: $42,000 · EducationNYU LANGONE HEALTH SYSTEM: $293,000 · HealthNYU LANGONE HE…The Nebraska Medical Center: $104,000 · HealthThe Nebraska M…BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE CITY OF HOPE: $60,000 · HealthBECKMAN RESEAR…Children's Hospital Corporation: $40,000 · HealthChildren's Hos…Charity Navigator: $256,000 · Human ServicesThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies: $84,000 · Science & Tech
Other$1,572,000Education$1,517,000Health$497,000Human Services$256,000Science & Tech$84,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNew York University: $307,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNYU LANGONE HEALTH SYSTEM: $293,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetCharity Navigator: $256,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $234,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $216,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $210,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPHILADELPHIA UNIVERSITY: $162,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $122,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Nebraska Medical Center: $104,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $104,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies: $84,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $60,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE CITY OF HOPE: $60,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $60,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $42,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Cancer Socie…Fidelity Investments …
American Cancer Society IncGA13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Cancer Society Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Cancer Center Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Cancer Center Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to National Cancer Center Inc?

Find your warmest path to National Cancer Center Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on National Cancer Center’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home