· Public charity
National Black Child Development Institute
To improve and advance the quality of life for black children and families through education and advocacy.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 51% of NATIONAL BLACK CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $958,392 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $984,884 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $26,492 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $39k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $910k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BCDI DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA | $209,550 |
| BCDI PHILADELPHIA | $146,166 |
| BCDI HAMPTON ROADS | $103,250 |
| BCDI COLORADO | $100,500 |
| BCDI NEW YORK STATE | $100,500 |
| BCDI MIAMI | $100,000 |
| BCDI CHICAGO | $92,500 |
| BCDI ATLANTA | $58,032 |
| BCDI DALLAS | $39,494 |
| BCDI DETROIT | $8,400 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $778k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NBNATIONAL BLACK CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC ATLANTA AFFILIATE7× · 2018–2024 · $235k · revenue +652% · 53% of their budget
- NBNATIONAL BLACK CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC4× · 2021–2024 · $221k · revenue +17% · 71% of their budget
- BCBLACK CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE WISCONSIN4× · 2020–2023 · $64k · revenue +374%
Funded once
- BDBCDI DENVERone grant, 2018 · $20k
- BCBLACK CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE-CAROLINASone grant, 2023 · $16k
- BPBCDI PARAMUSone grant, 2022 · $16k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To improve & advance the quality of life for Black children and families in Georgia through education and advocacy.
Black Californians United for Early Care and Education is committed to disrupting and abolishing over 400 years of intentionally designed institutional and systemic racism. We work to ensure California's ECE system is culturally affirming…
The Black Health Care Coalition purpose is to reduce health disparities through access to care health promotion and patient advocacy The organization hosts programs such as Community Baby Showers for expecting families to support their…
NDCC works collaboratively with partners to conduct and contract with others to conduct general organizational training activities including engaging in conferences and membership solicitation to educate, organize and distribute leadership…
Network for the Development of Children of African Descent exists to strengthen the cultural connections within communities of African descent that promote, sustain and enhance the healthy development of our children. Program activities…
To support black community memebers with resources and tools in an effort to promote and encourage economic growth, academic success, and job kills while encouraging and providing opportunity to serve in the community
To elevate black accomplishments
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Black Child Development Institute Ohio and the most unlike its peers is America's Charities. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATIONAL BLACK CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC ATLANTA AFFILIATE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL BLACK CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds Black Child Development Institute-District of Columbia ↗
- Who funds BLACK CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE COLORADO ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL BLACK CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE MI NATIONAL BLACK CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE MI ↗
- Who funds BLACK CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE WISCONSIN ↗
- Who funds BLACK CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE DALLAS FORT WORT ↗
- Who funds AMERICA'S CHARITIES ↗
- Who funds BLACK CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE OHIO ↗
- Who funds BLACK CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE-FTLAUDERDALEIN ↗
- Who funds BLACK CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE-CAROLINAS ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL BLACK CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization National Black Child Development Institute funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.