Skip to content
National Athletic Trainers' Association Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

National Athletic Trainers' Association Inc

The mission of the national athletic trainers' association is to enhance the quality of health care provided by certified athletic trainers and to advance the athletic training profession.

$97k
Granted FY2021
2
Grants FY2021
2
States reached
$47k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Philanthropy$1.1MRecreation & Sports$940kPublic Benefit$364kHealth$226kCommunity Improvement$142kScience & Tech$53kEmployment$38kEducation$8k
02FY2021 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $62,731, the rows itemized in this filing. The $97,308 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $34,577 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$46,669
Median grant
2
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY$46,669
SOUTH CAROLINA ATHLETIC TRAINERS' ASSOCIATION$16,062
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 81% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ARIZONA ATA: $15k → 11%ATHLETIC TRAINERS OF MASSACHUSETTS: $25k → 7%ATHLETIC TRAINERS OF MASSACHUSETTS: $17k → 11%MINNESOTA ATA: $49k → 9%MINNESOTA ATA: $21k → 11%PENNSYLVANIA AT SOCIETY: $27k → 10%CALIFORNIA ATA: $127k → 14%NEW YORK STATE ATA: $38k → 9%NATA RESEARCH & EDUCATION FDTN: $382k → 14%SOUTH CAROLINA ATHLETIC TRAINERS' ASSOCIATION: $16k → 12%ARKANSAS ATA: $26k → 14%Kansas Athletic Trainers' Society: $10k → 10%MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY: $47k → 15%MISSOURI ATA: $16k → 15%Oregon Athletic Trainers' Society: $11k → 8%CONNECTICUT ATA: $23k → 7%RHODE ISLAND ATA: $14k → 7%Colorado Athletic Trainers' Association: $24k → 7%INDIANA ATA: $16k → 16%OHIO ATA: $18k → 15%WVATA: $12k → 18%WVATA: $20k → 19%ILLINOIS ATA: $24k → 8%ILLINOIS ATA: $24k → 19%ATSNJ: $23k → 11%ATSNJ: $18k → 12%VERMONT ASSOCIATION OF ATHLETIC TRAINERS: $10k → 9%MARYLAND ATA: $18k → 11%MARYLAND ATA: $15k → 19%ARIZONA ATA: $35k → 11%ATHLETIC TRAINERS OF MASSACHUSETTS: $14k → 11%MINNESOTA ATA: $46k → 9%PENNSYLVANIA AT SOCIETY: $22k → 10%CALIFORNIA ATA: $113k → 14%NEW YORK STATE ATA: $36k → 9%NATA RESEARCH & EDUCATION FDTN: $364k → 14%ARKANSAS ATA: $17k → 14%MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY: $47k → 15%CONNECTICUT ATA: $18k → 7%RHODE ISLAND ATA: $12k → 7%INDIANA ATA: $13k → 16%ILLINOIS ATA: $24k → 19%ATSNJ: $18k → 12%PENNSYLVANIA AT SOCIETY: $16k → 10%CALIFORNIA ATA: $110k → 14%NEW YORK STATE ATA: $33k → 9%NATA RESEARCH & EDUCATION FDTN: $337k → 14%CONNECTICUT ATA: $16k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
VT
WA
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
WV
VA
MD
AZ
KS
AR
NC
SC
DC
HI
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 25 repeat orgs$328k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2021, 24 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
14

Total granted

$2.5M
$312k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+0%

Still filing today

48%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Community ImprovementPhilanthropyEmploymentHealthRecreation & SportsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    California Athletic Trainers Association
    3× · 2017–2019 · $351k · revenue +4% · 96% of their budget
  • NY
    NEW YORK STATE ATHLETIC TRAINERS ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $107k · revenue +144%
  • PA
    PENNSYLVANIA ATHLETIC TRAINERS' SOCIETY INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $65k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $144k · revenue +102%
  • CA
    COLORADO ATHLETIC TRAINERS ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2019 · $24k
  • IA
    Illinois Athletic Trainers Association
    one grant, 2019 · $24k · revenue +0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Louisiana Athletic Trainers Assn Foundation Inc

The organization's primary exempt purposes are to (1) develop, promote, and maintain high standards for the professionals of athletic training within the state of louisiana; (2) organize, cooperate with, and aid other groups dedicated to…

Education
2
Michigan Athletic Trainers Society Inc

Provide support and professional advancement of athletic trainers and athletic training students in the state of michigan.

—
3
Eastern Athletic Trainers Association Inc

The advancement, encouragement, and improvement of the athletic training profession in all of its aspects; to encourage improved working relationships among all persons interested in, and working with, the problems that are inherent in the…

—
4
Armed Forces Athletic Trainers Society

Armed forces athletic trainers support for academy members

Civil Rights
5
American Tennis Association

To develop, promote, and showcase opportunities through tennis

Recreation & Sports
6
College Athletic Trainer's Society

The College Athletic Trainers' Society is founded to provide high quality care to our student-athletes; to foster a close working relationship with organizations whose interests are to promote intercollegiate athletics; and to address the…

Education
7
Pro Tech Athletes Coalition
Recreation & Sports
8
Ola Athletic Association
—
9
Powerability

Athletic training and education

Human Services
10
American Physical Therapy Association of Massachusetts Inc

Develop and improve physical therapy education, practice, and research.

—
11
American Physical Therapy Association Montana Chapter

Apta mts mission is to address the needs and interests of members to promote the highest standards for physical therapy practice education and research and to ensure that the physical therapy profession serves the evolving health and…

—
12
Old Timers Athletic Association of Greenwich Connecticut Inc

To promote and support the concepts of sports as part of the educational process

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is South Carolina Athletic Trainers Association; the most unlike its peers is The University of Connecticut Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/22
Grantees still filing
11/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

California Athletic Trainers Association: $350,692 · OtherCalifornia Athletic Trainers AssociationMinnesota Athletic Trainers Associa: $115,463 · OtherMinnesota Athletic Trainers AssociaMISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY: $93,338 · OtherMISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITYDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ATHLETIC TRAINERS ASSOCIATION INC: $87,450 · OtherDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ATHLETIC TRAINERS ASSOCIATION…PENNSYLVANIA ATHLETIC TRAINERS' SOCIETY INC: $65,494 · OtherATHLETIC TRAINERS SOCIETY OF NEW JERSEY: $58,500 · OtherCONNECTICUT ATHLETIC TRAINERS ASSOCIATION INC: $56,959 · OtherARIZONA ATHLETIC TRAINERS ASSOCIATION: $50,000 · OtherILLINOIS ATA: $48,000 · Other+18 more: $355,629 · Other+18 moreNATIONAL ATHLETIC TRAINERS' ASSOCIATION RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $1,082,555 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL ATHLETIC TRAINERS' ASSOCIATION RE…Athletic Trainers of Massachusetts Inc: $55,198 · Community ImprovementOHIO ATHLETIC TRAINERS ASSOCIATION: $28,000 · Community ImprovementMISSOURI ATHLETIC TRAINERS ASSOC: $22,718 · Community ImprovementSOUTH CAROLINA ATHLETIC TRAINERS ASSOCIATION: $16,062 · Community ImprovementLouisiana Athletic Trainers Association: $14,000 · Community ImprovementHAWAII ATHLETIC TRAINERS ASSOCIATION: $9,834 · Community ImprovementGEORGIA ATHLETIC TRAINERS ASSOCIATION INC: $8,750 · Community Improvement+1 more: $5,216 · Community ImprovementTHE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC: $144,000 · EducationNEW YORK STATE ATHLETIC TRAINERS ASSOCIATION: $106,922 · EmploymentARKANSAS ATHLETIC TRAINERS ASSOCIATION: $52,536 · HealthHawaii Athletic Trainers Association: $25,996 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,281,525Philanthropy$1,082,555Community Improvement$159,778Education$144,000Employment$106,922Health$52,536Recreation & Sports$25,996

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL ATHLETIC TRAINERS' ASSOCIATION RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $1,082,555 over 3y, 36% of budgetCalifornia Athletic Trainers Association: $350,692 over 3y, 96% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC: $144,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMinnesota Athletic Trainers Associa: $115,463 over 3y, 56% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA ATHLETIC TRAINERS' SOCIETY INC: $65,494 over 3y, 12% of budgetATHLETIC TRAINERS SOCIETY OF NEW JERSEY: $58,500 over 3y, 12% of budgetATHLETIC TRAINERS ASSOCIATION OF FLORIDA: $39,224 over 3y, 13% of budgetINDIANA ATHLETIC TRAINERS ASSOCIATION INC: $29,200 over 2y, 12% of budgetOHIO ATHLETIC TRAINERS ASSOCIATION: $28,000 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetHawaii Athletic Trainers Association: $25,996 over 2y, 59% of budgetWisconsin Athletic Trainers Association Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 8.9% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA ATHLETIC TRAINERS ASSOCIATION: $16,062 over 1y, 21% of budgetGEORGIA ATHLETIC TRAINERS ASSOCIATION INC: $8,750 over 1y, 17% of budgetVirginia Athletic Trainers Association: $8,750 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetNorth Carolina Athletic Training Assoc: $5,216 over 1y, 7.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Great Lakes Athletic …
Great Lakes Athletic Trainers AssociatiIL15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Great Lakes Athletic Trainers Associati

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Athletic Trainers' Association Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Athletic Trainers' Association Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on National Athletic Trainers' Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home