Skip to content
National Association of Manufacturers of the United States of America at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

National Association of Manufacturers of the United States of America

To enhance the competitiveness of manufacturers by shaping a legislative and regulatory environment conducive to u.s.

$1.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Public Benefit$1.1MEmployment$852kInternational$32kArts & Culture$30kAnimals$25kCommunity Improvement$20kHealth$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $1,366,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,403,802 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $37,802 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $78k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.3M
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$69M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRUMP VANCE INAUGURAL COMMITTEE INC$1,000,000
THE MANUFACTURING INSTITUTE$282,000
STORY PARTNERS LLC$30,000
TAX FOUNDATION$20,000
WASHINGTON INTERNATIONAL TRADE FOUNDATION$18,000
THE GEORGIA STATE SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON$10,000
SO OTHERS MIGHT EAT$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CONFERENCE BOARD: $10k → 17%WASHINGTON PRESS CLUB FOUNDATION: $17k → 14%ILLINOIS MANUFACTURERS' ASSOCIATION: $10k → 11%THE GEORGIA STATE SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON: $10k → 6%TRUMP VANCE INAUGURAL COMMITTEE INC: $1.0M → 14%ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $10k → 6%TAX FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%BRYCE HARLOW FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%STORY PARTNERS LLC: $30k → 14%THE MANUFACTURING INSTITUTE: $425k → 14%THE MANUFACTURING INSTITUTE: $282k → 14%THE MANUFACTURING INSTITUTE: $145k → 14%SO OTHERS MIGHT EAT: $6k → 14%WASHINGTON INTERNATIONAL TRADE FOUNDATION: $18k → 14%HUMANE RESCUE ALLIANCE: $10k → 14%WASHINGTON INTERNATIONAL TRADE FOUNDATION: $8k → 14%WASHINGTON INTERNATIONAL TRADE FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%WASHINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY DBA HUMANE RESCUE ALLIANCE: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$909k · 3 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +1% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
5

Total granted

$909k
$62k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
0%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Public BenefitInternationalAnimalsArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE MANUFACTURING INSTITUTE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $852k · revenue -2%
  • WI
    Washington Intl Trade Foundation
    3× · 2022–2024 · $32k · revenue +70%
  • WH
    WASHINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY
    2× · 2022–2023 · $25k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • WP
    WASHINGTON PRESS CLUB FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $17k
  • TB
    The Bryce Harlow Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue -7%
  • TC
    The Conference Board Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Washington Intl Trade Association

Washington International Trade Association (WITA) is a non-profit, non-partisan organization dedicated to providing a neutral forum in the nations capital for the open & robust discussion of international trade policy & related issues.

—
2
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
3
International Trademark Association Inc

We are a global association of brand owners and professionals dedicated to supporting trademarks and complementary intellectual property (IP) to foster consumer trust, economic growth, and innovation, and committed to building a better…

—
4
Institute of International Bankers

The iib represents the interests of the international banking community before u.s. legislative/regulatory bodies liaises with international regulatory bodies serves as a source of information to the media and other interested parties…

—
5
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
6
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
7
National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors

Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.

—
8
Association of Washington Business

Awb is the catalytic leader and unifying voice for economic prosperity, enabling our members, their employees and all citizens to prosper throughout washington state.

—
9
Washington Area Community Investment Fund Inc

The washington area community investment fund (wacif) is a nonprofit community loan fund focused on increasing equity and economic opportunity in the washington, dc area's underserved communities. wacif's mission is driven is driven by…

—
10
Washington Society of Certified Public a

We are a community of cpas and financial professionals cultivating authentic relationships, unique learning experiences, and purposeful advocacy for our future.

—
11
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
12
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Conference Board Inc; the most unlike its peers is 58TH Presidential Inaugural Committee. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
4/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

58TH PRESIDENTIAL INAUGURAL COMMITTEE: $1,000,000 · Other58TH PRESIDENTIAL INAUGURAL COMMITTEETHE MANUFACTURING INSTITUTE: $852,000 · OtherTHE MANUFACTURING INSTITUTE+5 more: $71,000 · OtherWashington Intl Trade Foundation: $32,000 · InternationalWASHINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY: $25,000 · AnimalsTAX FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Public BenefitWASHINGTON PRESS CLUB FOUNDATION: $16,600 · Arts & CultureThe Conference Board Inc: $10,000 · Community ImprovementALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 · Health
Other$1,923,000International$32,000Animals$25,000Public Benefit$20,000Arts & Culture$16,600Community Improvement$10,000Health$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MANUFACTURING INSTITUTE: $852,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetWashington Intl Trade Foundation: $32,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetWASHINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTAX FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Bryce Harlow Foundation: $15,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetThe Conference Board Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetILLINOIS MANUFACTURERS' ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF STATE S DBA THE GEORGIA STATE SOCIETY O: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOME INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

American Online Givin…
American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Association of Manufacturers of the United States of America funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Association of Manufacturers of the United States of America. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on National Association of Manufacturers of the United States of America’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home