· Public charity
National American Indian Housing Council
To effectively and efficiently promote and support american indians, alaska natives and native hawaiians in their self-determined goals to provide culturally relevant and quality affordable housing for native people.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2023.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HO-CHUNK HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY | $52,570 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 60% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Where the work is directed
The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.
About 5% of National American Indian Housing Council’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
4 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- RCRED CLIFF CHIPPEWA HOUSING AUTHORITY2× · 2021–2022 · $138k
- WSWARM SPRINGS HOUSING AUTHORITY2× · 2021–2022 · $74k
- MCMOWA CHOCTAW HOUSING AUTHORITY2× · 2021–2022 · $44k
Funded once
- DCDRY CREEK RANCHERIAone grant, 2021 · $74k
- TRTlingit-Haida Regional Housing Authorityone grant, 2021 · $74k · revenue -13%
- SFSAC & FOX HOUSING AUTHORITY OF MISSOURIone grant, 2021 · $74k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Enterprise Community Partners Inc · First Nations Development Institute
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization National American Indian Housing Council funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National American Indian Housing Council. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on National American Indian Housing Council’s filings →