Skip to content

· Public charity

National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression

NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA AND DEPRESSION (narsad) d/b/a the brain & behavior research foundation is committed to alleviating the suffering of mental illness by awarding grants that will lead to advances and breakthroughs in scientific research.

$12M
Granted FY2024still arriving
80
Grants FY2024still arriving
30
States reached
$385k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$30MHealth$28MScience & Tech$24MRecreation & Sports$535kInternational$300kYouth Development$210k
02FY2024 · 80 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 80 grants below total $8,433,434, the rows itemized in this filing. The $11,577,332 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $3,143,898 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k35 grants · $1.2M
  • $50k–250k39 grants · $5.3M
  • $250k+6 grants · $1.9M
$69,918
Median grant
30
States reached
$62M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY$384,952
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES$379,900
MCLEAN HOSPITAL$314,797
ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI$279,997
YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$279,692
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$274,990
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO$245,000
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT (NICHDNIH)$245,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$245,000
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL$244,902
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA$244,378
HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL$240,000
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA$210,000
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$210,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO$209,900
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Harvard Medical School MGH: $644k → 16%University of Pittsburgh: $482k → 11%Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory: $295k → 7%Baylor College of Medicine: $328k → 16%University of North Carolina: $402k → 13%Emory University: $335k → 14%National Institute of Mental Health: $315k → 8%Johns Hopkins University: $537k → 19%Pennsylvania State University: $453k → 11%University of California San Francisco: $595k → 10%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $303k → 11%PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $451k → 11%Stanford University: $525k → 8%University of California San Francisco: $420k → 10%University OF Pittsburgh: $367k → 11%Stanford University: $505k → 8%University of California San Francisco: $355k → 10%Stanford University: $318k → 8%University of California San Francisco: $320k → 10%Massachusetts Institute of Technology: $313k → 8%Stanford University: $315k → 8%Children's Hospital of Philadelphia: $349k → 22%Stanford University: $295k → 8%Children's Hospital of Philadelphia: $295k → 22%University of California Los Angeles: $454k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $380k → 14%University of California San Diego: $320k → 11%University of California Los Angeles: $315k → 14%University of California San Diego: $315k → 11%Doctors Without Borders: $300k → 17%University of California San Diego: $295k → 11%Columbia University: $530k → 17%Columbia University: $455k → 17%Columbia University: $400k → 17%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $385k → 17%Columbia University: $350k → 17%McLean Hospital: $410k → 8%MCLEAN HOSPITAL: $315k → 8%New York University: $312k → 17%Massachusetts General Hospital: $314k → 16%Columbia University: $435k → 17%Columbia University: $330k → 17%Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai: $874k → 17%Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai: $525k → 17%Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai: $490k → 17%Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai: $468k → 17%Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai: $455k → 17%Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai: $455k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $3.0M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 6 regions, $2.9M to organizations and $100k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$1.8M · 59% · 38 grants

Stated purpose: RESEARCH GRANT

North America (Canada and Mexico)$590k · 20% · 11 grants

Stated purpose: RESEARCH GRANT

East Asia and the Pacific$313k · 11% · 7 grants

Stated purpose: RESEARCH GRANT

Middle East and North Africa$100k · 3% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: RESEARCH GRANT

Sub-Saharan Africa$100k · 3% · 1 person

Stated purpose: PARDES PRIZE/AWARD

South America$98k · 3% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: RESEARCH GRANT

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$67M · 146 repeat orgs$2.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +39% for those funded once.

146 repeat relationships: 67 still active in FY2024, 79 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

146
45

Total granted

$67M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+39%

Still filing today

60%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $140k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthScience & TechRecreation & SportsInternationalSocial ScienceOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI
    8× · 2017–2024 · $4.0M · revenue +58%
  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.7M · revenue +44%
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $300k · revenue +98%
  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $150k · revenue +22%
  • BB
    BRENTWOOD BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2017 · $98k · revenue -91%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
3
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
4
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
5
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

—
6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
10
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
11
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Wpi transforms lives, turns knowledge into action to confront global challenges, and revolutionizes stem through distinctive and inclusive education, projects and research. (http://www.wpi.edu/about/mission.html)

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgetown University; the most unlike its peers is Terasaki Inst for Biomedical Innovation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

131 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 131 of the 207 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
129/131
Grantees still filing
118/131
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $3,951,982 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAIYale University: $3,426,315 · EducationYale UniversityTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $3,204,138 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY O…UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $2,692,799 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGHTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $2,657,040 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNI…New York University: $1,698,096 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $1,498,583 · EducationVanderbilt University: $1,465,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $1,319,744 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $1,226,190 · Education+59 more: $13,134,542 · Education+59 moreUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $2,390,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCOREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA: $2,268,243 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIAMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $2,107,827 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT SAN DIEGO: $1,901,231 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT SAN…MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $1,898,890 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDNIHNIA: $1,627,357 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK: $1,265,792 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $1,194,412 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $1,184,051 · Other+72 more: $18,317,176 · Other+72 moreTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $1,699,128 · HealthTHE CHILDRE…RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE INC: $1,491,404 · HealthRESEARCH FO…NEW YORK WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER FUND INC: $1,207,336 · HealthNEW YORK WE…Vanderbilt University Medical Center: $507,426 · HealthVanderbilt …BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $314,580 · Health+32 more: $3,243,132 · Health+32 moreCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $800,000 · Science & TechThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies: $376,784 · Science & TechHUGO W MOSER RESEARCH INSTITUTE AT KENNEDY KRIEGER INC: $174,552 · Science & TechFLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $70,000 · Science & TechTHE SCINTILLON INSTITUTE: $69,462 · Science & Tech+2 more: $70,000 · Science & TechNorthwestern University: $1,091,102 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $150,000 · Recreation & SportsBROWN UNIVERSITY: $274,948 · Community ImprovementMARSHALL UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION: $105,000 · Community ImprovementMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $300,000 · InternationalLaureate Institute for Brain Research Inc: $139,298 · Social Science
Education$36,274,429Other$34,154,979Health$8,463,006Science & Tech$1,560,798Recreation & Sports$1,241,102Community Improvement$379,948International$300,000Social Science$139,298

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $3,951,982 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetYale University: $3,426,315 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $3,204,138 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $2,692,799 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $2,657,040 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $1,699,128 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University: $1,698,096 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $1,498,583 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetRESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE INC: $1,491,404 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetVanderbilt University: $1,465,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $1,319,744 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $1,226,190 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER FUND INC: $1,207,336 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $1,132,491 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $1,091,102 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University: $964,882 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $888,361 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $800,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $757,896 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $735,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $637,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $626,516 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $560,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Health Sciences and Pharmacy in St Louis: $524,994 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center: $507,426 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $455,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $420,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $382,448 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies: $376,784 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $375,618 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $350,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $314,580 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $300,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $285,486 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $280,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAlbert Einstein College of Medicine: $280,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LIEBER INSTITUTE INC: $279,638 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $274,948 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $260,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $244,883 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION: $244,754 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $244,632 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $239,328 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $210,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $209,721 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $209,114 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN STATE RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $204,964 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetThe George Washington University: $192,492 over 6y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
  • Who funds Yale University ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE INC ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds The Research Foundation for The State University of New York ↗
  • Who funds COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Baylor College of Medicine ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Heart Association IncTX47.5× affinity25 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Heart Association Inc · Yale University · The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York · Johns Hopkins University · Cornell University · Washington University · Alzheimer's Disease & Related Disorders Association Inc · The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · Vanderbilt University Medical Center · American Foundation for Suicide Prevention · American Cancer Society Inc · Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Laureate Institute for Brain Research Inc: 59% of income from government
  • Hebrew Rehabilitation Center: 53% of income from government
  • Hugo W Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Portland Va Research Foundation: 34% of income from government
  • The Lieber Institute Inc: 31% of income from government
  • University of Delaware: 30% of income from government
  • Max Planck Florida Corporation: 23% of income from government
  • Veterans Education and Research Association of Northern New England Inc: 17% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • The Trustees of the Stevens Institute of Technology: 12% of income from government
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • Brandeis University: 9% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Northeastern University: 7% of income from government
  • Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research: 7% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc: 6% of income from government
  • The University of Tulsa: 5% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
  • Quinnipiac University: 0% of income from government
  • Rowan University Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • The Cooper Health System a New Jersey Non-Profit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression?

Find your warmest path to National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 207 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression’s filings →

More from the funding graph