Skip to content

California · Private foundation

Nathan Anne Kim & Julian Geller Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
12
Grants FY2024
8
Organizations funded FY2023
63%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$100,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$340,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 42
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
2
Total assets, FY2024
$17M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 63% of the organizations Nathan Anne Kim & Julian Geller Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 54% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $194k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationInternationalReligionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving10$844k70%
FY20238$363k63%
FY202222$469k27%
FY202142$821k60%
FY202024$379k83%
FY201919$824k95%
FY20182$1k100%
FY20171$300kn/a
94% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$2.5MInternational$1.1MReligion$850kPhilanthropy$731kScience & Tech$100kCivil Rights$50kHuman Services$50kYouth Development$18kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
MI
NY
NV
CA
MO
MD
AZ
DC
TX
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 41 grantees
All grantees of Nathan Anne Kim & Julian Geller Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Friends of Jerusalem College of Technology Ltd$340,00017%
American Friends of Tel Aviv Univ$300,00011%
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc$300,00020%
Israel Emergency Alliance$235,00031%
Merona Leadership Foundation$215,00069%
Americans for Ben-Gurion University Inc$180,00010%
Friends of Elnet$101,10031%
Yeshiva Ketana of Los Angeles$97,36541%
American Israel Education Foundation Inc$75,00010%
Yeshiva Day School of Las Vegas$54,00031%
Israeli-American Council$50,00010%
Israeli-American Coalition for Action$50,0001n/a
Torah Academy of Boca Raton Inc$42,00020%
Ilan Ramon Day School$39,00021%
Jewish School of Miami Corp$38,0002n/a
Shearim Torah High School Inc$36,00022%
Phoenix Hebrew Academy Inc$36,0002n/a
Yeshivat Ohr Chanoch Inc$33,0001n/a
Tucson Hebrew Academy$30,00021%
Seward Park Jewish Preschool Co-Op$28,00021%
H F Epstein Hebrew Academy$26,0001n/a
Missouri Torah Institute$26,00011%
Esther Miller Bais Yaakov High School of St Louis$26,00014%
Katz Yeshiva High School of South Florida Inc$26,00010%
Birthright Israel Foundation$25,00010%
Iac-International Academy of Consciousness Inc$25,0001n/a
Yeshiva Tiferes Torah of Boca Raton Inc$24,0001n/a
Nagel Jewish Academy$19,0002n/a
Orlando Torah Academy Inc$18,00011%
Wisconsin Institute for Torah Study$18,0001n/a
Oakland Hebrew Day School$18,00010%
Mesivta of Las Vegas$18,0001n/a
Yeshiva Elementary School - Milwaukee Inc$18,00011%
The Beth Yeshurun Day School$12,0001n/a
The Clubhouse Center For Respite And Inc$7,00012%
Stand by Me Inc$1,00010%
American Friends of Alyn Hospitalinc$1,00010%
Chabad of Century City$5851n/a
Saint Jude Parish$5001n/a
Ohel Moshe Congregation$5001n/a
Netaneli Hebrew Academy$2321n/a

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 43 recipients with no EIN on record ($1.4M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Nathan Anne Kim & Julian Geller Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFriends of Jerusalem College of Technology Ltd: $340,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetAmerican Friends of Tel Aviv Univ: $300,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAmerican Friends of Hebrew University Inc: $300,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetIsrael Emergency Alliance: $235,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetMerona Leadership Foundation: $215,000 over 6y, 8.8% of budgetAmericans for Ben-Gurion University Inc: $180,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFriends of Elnet: $101,100 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetYeshiva Ketana of Los Angeles: $97,365 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetAmerican Israel Education Foundation Inc: $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYeshiva Day School of Las Vegas: $54,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetIsraeli-American Council: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTorah Academy of Boca Raton Inc: $42,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetIlan Ramon Day School: $39,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetShearim Torah High School Inc: $36,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetTucson Hebrew Academy: $30,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSeward Park Jewish Preschool Co-Op: $28,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMissouri Torah Institute: $26,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetEsther Miller Bais Yaakov High School of St Louis: $26,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetKatz Yeshiva High School of South Florida Inc: $26,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBirthright Israel Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOrlando Torah Academy Inc: $18,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetOakland Hebrew Day School: $18,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYeshiva Elementary School - Milwaukee Inc: $18,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetThe Clubhouse Center For Respite And Inc: $7,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetStand by Me Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican Friends of Alyn Hospitalinc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 26.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY24.9× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Greater Horizons · Goldner Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Federation Council of Greater La · The Zev and Susan Munk Family Foundation · Chinuch Yehudi Inc · The Ari & Cheryl Pearl Foundation Inc · Fredman Family Charitable Trust · Center for Initiatives in Jewish Education · Ahavas Avraham Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Nathan Anne Kim & Julian Geller Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Nathan Anne Kim & Julian Geller Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Nathan Anne Kim & Julian Geller Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Nathan Anne Kim & Julian Geller Foundation

How much does Nathan Anne Kim & Julian Geller Foundation give?
Nathan Anne Kim & Julian Geller Foundation reported 12 grants totaling $1,249,085 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 42 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Nathan Anne Kim & Julian Geller Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Education (45%), International (20%), Religion (15%).
Who are Nathan Anne Kim & Julian Geller Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Friends of Jerusalem College of Technology Ltd ($340k), American Friends of Tel Aviv Univ ($300k), American Friends of Hebrew University Inc ($300k).
Does Nathan Anne Kim & Julian Geller Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 63% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Nathan Anne Kim & Julian Geller Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Nathan Anne Kim & Julian Geller Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jewish Communal Fund, Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles, National Society for Hebrew Day Schools.
Where is Nathan Anne Kim & Julian Geller Foundation based?
Nathan Anne Kim & Julian Geller Foundation is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 87 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nathan Anne Kim & Julian Geller’s filings →

More from the funding graph