Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nate S & Ruth B Shapero Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2026still arriving
8
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$83kReligion$24kEnvironment$24kPhilanthropy$7kYouth Development$6kAnimals$250Other$0
02FY2026 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k7 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$3,300
Median grant
2
States reached
$474k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HENRY FORD HEALTH$10,000
DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$5,000
EAGLES FOR CHILDREN$4,515
NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATOIN$3,300
FOLDS OF HONOR$3,125
Individual grant recipient$1,796
THE ARK$1,000
NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–26, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 45% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%EAGLES FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 21%EAGLES FOR CHILDREN: $2k → 8%EAGLES FOR CHILDREN: $1k → 8%EAGLES FOR CHILDREN: $1k → 8%EAGLES FOR CHILDREN: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$180k · 7 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2026, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
3

Total granted

$180k
$1k

Still filing today

29%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM
    9× · 2018–2026 · $90k · revenue +69%
  • D
    DSO
    8× · 2018–2025 · $24k
  • GL
    GREAT LAKES FIELD SERVICE COUNCIL
    3× · 2018–2020 · $24k

Funded once

  • PF
    PROVIDENCE FOUNDATIONS OF OREGON
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $250
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $150
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/6
Grantees still filing
4/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM: $90,000 · HealthHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEMNational Kidney Foundation of Michigan Inc: $7,300 · HealthNational Kidney Foundation of Michigan IncDSO: $24,000 · OtherDSOGREAT LAKES FIELD SERVICE COUNCIL: $23,620 · OtherGREAT LAKES FIELD SERVICE COUNCILMICHIGAN CROSSROADS COUNCIL: $16,000 · OtherMICHIGAN CROSSROADS COUNCILTHE ARK: $9,000 · OtherTHE ARKCANTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · OtherCANTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC+4 more: $3,196 · OtherEAGLES FOR CHILDREN: $10,115 · Human ServicesDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $3,125 · Education
Health$97,300Other$81,816Human Services$10,115Arts & Culture$5,000Education$3,125

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM: $90,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetEAGLES FOR CHILDREN: $10,115 over 4y, 11% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation of Michigan Inc: $7,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCANTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds EAGLES FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds National Kidney Foundation of Michigan Inc ↗
  • Who funds CANTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nate S & Ruth B Shapero Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nate S & Ruth B Shapero Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nate S & Ruth B Shapero’s filings →

    More from the funding graph