Skip to content

· Private foundation

Natalia Mental Health Foundation Inc (Fka Myrtlewood Foundation Inc)

THE FOUNDATION MISSION IS TO SUPPORT AND PROMOTE RESEARCH AND LIVING FACILITIES AND ENGAGE IN OTHER ACTIVITIES TO ASSIST THE INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES, AND COMMUNITIES AFFECTED BY MENTAL ILLNESSES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO SCHIZOPHRENIA AND/OR BIPOLAR DISORDER.

$111k
Granted FY2023
5
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Education$350kHealth$263kScience & Tech$100kEmployment$65kPhilanthropy$31kFood & Nutrition$12k
02FY2023 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $61k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$50,000
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND$31,192
BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER$10,000
DARTMOUTH COLLEGE$10,000
TRIVIUM LIFE SERVICES$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 44% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $50k → 8%BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER: $10k → 16%MERRY MEADOW FARM INC: $12k → 10%DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $78k → 10%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $50k → 8%BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER: $10k → 16%TRIVIUM LIFE SERVICES: $10k → 10%DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $64k → 10%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $50k → 8%BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER: $10k → 16%DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $40k → 10%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $50k → 8%BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER: $10k → 16%DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $25k → 10%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $50k → 8%BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER: $5k → 16%DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $10k → 10%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $50k → 8%FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $31k → 16%DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $10k → 10%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $50k → 8%DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $10k → 10%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $50k → 8%DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $10k → 10%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $50k → 8%DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 75% of Natalia Mental Health Foundation Inc (Fka Myrtlewood Foundation Inc)’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Natalia Mental Health Foundation Inc (Fka Myrtlewood Foundation Inc)lessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 23% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
04Its field
05the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
4/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Massachusetts Institute of Technology: $350,000 · EducationMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyTrustees of Dartmouth College: $242,800 · EducationTrustees of Dartmouth CollegePresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $100,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard CollegeBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $45,000 · HealthDartmouth-Hitchcock Health: $20,000 · HealthFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $31,192 · OtherMERRY MEADOW FARM INC: $12,000 · OtherTRIVIUM LIFE SERVICES: $10,000 · OtherDARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $10,000 · Other
Education$692,800Health$65,000Other$63,192

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $350,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College: $242,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $45,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDartmouth-Hitchcock Health: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Dartmouth College ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Dartmouth-Hitchcock Health ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Natalia Mental Health Foundation Inc (Fka Myrtlewood Foundation Inc) funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Natalia Mental Health Foundation Inc (Fka Myrtlewood Foundation Inc). Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Natalia Mental Health Foundation Inc (Fka Myrtlewood Foundation Inc)?

Find your warmest path to Natalia Mental Health Foundation Inc (Fka Myrtlewood Foundation Inc) through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Natalia Mental Health Foundation Inc (Fka Myrtlewood Foundation Inc)’s filings →

More from the funding graph