· Public charity
Nar Incorporated
Improve and maintain the health and nutriotional status of children , promote development of good eating habits and integrate nutritious food service with organized child care services.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 67 grants below total $4,614,613 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $5,466,897 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $852,284 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k4 grants · $30k
- $10k–50k22 grants · $662k
- $50k–250k41 grants · $3.9M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Tony's Playhouse Discovery Center | $226,385 |
| Instituto Bilingue Montessori San Jose | $225,461 |
| Golden Bee Learning Center | $205,434 |
| Over the Rainbow Day Care Center | $168,815 |
| Royal Education Center | $168,172 |
| Imagination Station Academy 1 | $158,840 |
| Instituto Mexico en Texas LLC | $135,138 |
| Kiddos Learning Center | $134,012 |
| Little Giants Learning Center | $115,558 |
| Instituto Bilingue Montessori San Jose | $113,863 |
| Imagination Station Academy 3 | $113,012 |
| Imagination Station Academy 2 | $111,111 |
| Kids' Kollege Learning Center | $109,839 |
| Imagination Station Academy 4 | $97,773 |
| Harlingen Child Development Center | $91,402 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 26%, against an area that typically sits at 26%. 68% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
66 repeat relationships — 65 still active in FY2022, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GBGolden Bee Learning Center3× · 2020–2022 · $774k
- IBInstituto Bilingue Montessori San Jose3× · 2020–2022 · $717k
- TPTony's Playhouse Discovery Center3× · 2020–2022 · $688k
Funded once
- IBInstituto Bilingue Montessori San Joseone grant, 2017 · $426k
- TPTony's Playhouse Discovery Centerone grant, 2017 · $159k
- HCHarlingen Child Development Centerone grant, 2017 · $157k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2022.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2022, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 128 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Nar Incorporated?
Find your warmest path to Nar Incorporated through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.