Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nancy Lf Davis Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$104k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $80k
$2,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$776k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNICEF USA$30,500
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$19,000
LIED CENTER FOR PERFORMING ARTS$10,000
OAK PARK FOUNDATION$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
FOOD BANK OF LINCOLN$5,000
BSA SCOUTS CORNHUSKER COUNCIL$2,000
WONDER WORKS CHARITABLE FUND$2,000
LIONS EYE BANK OF NEBRASKA$2,000
FEEDING AMERICA$2,000
THE CARTER CENTER$2,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$2,000
BRIDGES$2,000
ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION$25
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE BLOC INC: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$326k · 11 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue 0% since the first grant, against -88% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
2

Total granted

$326k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
-88%

Still filing today

45%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
InternationalFood & NutritionHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    BSA SCOUTS CORNHUSKER COUNCIL
    2× · 2024–2025 · $127k
  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    2× · 2024–2025 · $41k · revenue +16%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $39k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • TB
    THE BLOC INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
2
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
3
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International
4
Food Bank Association of New York State

The mission of feeding new york state is to lead a unified effort for a hunger-free state of new york. the mission of food banking is to obtain food and deliver it to emergency food programs. feeding new york state works to end hunger by…

Food & Nutrition
5
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
6
Northern Illinois Food Bank

With the support of our community, we provide over 90 million meals annually through our network of over 900 member food pantries and programs across thirteen counties, currently reaching over a half million individuals each month with…

Food & Nutrition
7
International Food Information Council

To effectively communicate science based information on food safety, nutrition, and health for the public good.

Arts & Culture
8
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
9
Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc

Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
10
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
11
Food Bank of Iowa

The organization receives, warehouses, and distributes salvageable food items to non-profit tax exempt member agencies to feed the ill, needy, and infants.

Food & Nutrition
12
California Association of Food Banks

California association of food banks (cafb) is a non-profit public benefit corporation located in oakland, california. together with its 41-member foodbanks, cafb is the largest charitable hunger-relief and anti-hunger leader in the state.…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Bloc Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
1/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BSA SCOUTS CORNHUSKER COUNCIL: $127,000 · OtherBSA SCOUTS CORNHUSKER COUNCILIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOAK PARK FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherOAK PARK FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBRIDGES: $13,000 · OtherBRIDGESWONDER WORKS CHARITABLE FUND: $12,000 · OtherWONDER WORKS CHARITABLE FUNDBOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA: $10,000 · Other+1 more: $1,000 · OtherUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $40,500 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEFMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $39,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $12,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $12,000 · InternationalTHE CARTER CENTER INCFOOD BANK OF LINCOLN INC: $15,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $2,000 · Food & NutritionTHE BLOC INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesLIONS EYE BANK OF NEBRASKA INC: $2,000 · Community ImprovementNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $25 · Environment
Other$218,000International$103,500Food & Nutrition$17,000Human Services$5,000Community Improvement$2,000Environment$25

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $40,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $39,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF LINCOLN INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIONS EYE BANK OF NEBRASKA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF LINCOLN INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BLOC INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds LIONS EYE BANK OF NEBRASKA INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nancy Lf Davis Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nancy Lf Davis Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Nancy Lf Davis Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Nancy Lf Davis Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nancy Lf Davis Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph