Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nancy a Josephson Charitable Trust U Art Fourth

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$164k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Education$90kPhilanthropy$73kHealth$71kInternational$25kArts & Culture$7kReligion$6kHuman Services$5kCivil Rights$2k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $153k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$781k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOS ANGELES JEWISH FEDERATION$25,000
UCLA FOUNDATION$25,000
UCLA FOUNDATION$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$20,000
LOS ANGELES JEWISH FEDERATION$18,000
CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER$15,000
CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER$15,000
FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DEFESENSE FORCES$10,000
ONE VOICE$5,000
JEWBELONG$5,000
SINAI TEMPLE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ONE VOICE: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 17% of Nancy a Josephson Charitable Trust U Art Fourth’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Nancy a Josephson Charitable Trust U Art Fourthlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.7% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$125k · 3 repeat orgs$58k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
6

Total granted

$125k
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+2%

Still filing today

33%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
HealthArts & CultureCivil RightsReligionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LA
    LOS ANGELES JEWISH FEDERATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $68k
  • CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
    2× · 2023–2024 · $32k · revenue +26%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DEFESENSE FORCES
    2× · 2023–2024 · $25k

Funded once

  • RR
    RONAL REAGAN UCLA MEDICAL CENTER BOARD STRATEGIC FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $13k · revenue +16%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC
    one grant, 2023 · $4k · revenue -45%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
2
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
5
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
6
National Jewish Health

National Jewish Health's mission since 1899 is to heal, discover and educate as a preeminent healthcare institution. We serve by providing the best integrated and innovative care for patients and their families; by understanding and…

Health
7
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
8
United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc

Uja-federation of new york (uja) cares for jews everywhere and new yorkers of all backgrounds, responds to crises close to home and far away, and shapes the jewish future. through strategic grantmaking, uja provides funding and resources…

Philanthropy
9
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
10
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
11
University of Judaism Foundation
—
12
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Jewish Committee; the most unlike its peers is Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LOS ANGELES JEWISH FEDERATION: $68,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES JEWISH FEDERATIONRONAL REAGAN UCLA MEDICAL CENTER BOARD STRATEGIC FUND: $25,000 · OtherRONAL REAGAN UCLA MEDICAL CENTER BOARD STRATEGIC…FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DEFESENSE FORCES: $25,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF ISRAEL DEFESENSE FORCES+1 more: $1,000 · OtherUCLA FOUNDATION: $60,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $30,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIACEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $32,000 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI MEDIC…American Heart Association Inc: $12,500 · HealthAmerican Heart Ass…+1 more: $1,000 · HealthFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $4,300 · Arts & CultureJEWISH STORY PARTNERS: $2,500 · Arts & CultureJEWBELONG INC: $5,000 · ReligionOne Voice: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $1,800 · Civil Rights
Other$119,000Education$90,000Health$45,500Arts & Culture$6,800Religion$5,000Human Services$5,000Philanthropy$5,000Civil Rights$1,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $32,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWBELONG INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOne Voice: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $4,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH STORY PARTNERS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE LOS ANGELES FREE CLINIC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nancy a Josephson Charitable Trust U Art Fourth funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nancy a Josephson Charitable Trust U Art Fourth. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nancy a Josephson Charitable Trust U Art Fourth’s filings →

    More from the funding graph