How much did NAN H ALTMAYER CHARITABLE TRUST grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 65% of NAN H ALTMAYER CHARITABLE TRUST’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

togetherstudentsspringhill

2020

covidequipmenthill avenuespring hillmemory jayfoodmuseum

2021

hill avenuespring hillmemory jayendowment

2022

hurricane idaida reliefclotildaisraelmobile jewishspringhill avenuechurch

2023

clotildafestivalmobile jewishspringhill avenueendowment

2024

clotildaartisraelemergencymemory jayspringhill avenuechurch

2025

memory jayisraelspringhill avenuechurchmuseumendowmentpreparatory

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 57 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k27 grants · $91k
$10k–50k29 grants · $417k
$50k–250k1 grant · $109k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$14M

Total assets

Largest grants

DONORS CHOOSEORG$108,811
UNRWA$25,000
ANERA$25,000
DIVING WITH A PURPOSE$24,400
PENELOPE HOUSE$20,000
DWELL MOBILE$20,000
PUBLIC SAFETY CHAPLIN'S FIRST RESPONDER'S FUND$20,000
AUBURN UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF FORESTRY WILDLIFE AND ENVIRONMENT$20,000
UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION$20,000
THE CROSBY FUND FOR HAITIAN EDUCATION$20,000
MOBILE OPERA$18,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF MOBILE (MUSIC DEPARTMENT)$15,000
NATIONAL DOMESTIC WORKER ALLIANCE$15,000
O'NEILL THEATER$15,000
SPRINGHILL AVENUE TEMPLE (ENDOWMENT FUND)$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20% — the area typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$3.0M · 80 repeat orgs$694k to everyone else

80 repeat relationships — 43 still active in FY2025, 37 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$3.0M

$568k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%

+136%

Still filing today

36%

25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $126k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesInternationalEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

D
DONORSCHOOSEORG
4× · 2018–2021 · $198k · revenue +30%
PH
PENELOPE HOUSE
8× · 2018–2025 · $121k · revenue +26%
MO
MOBILE OPERA
7× · 2018–2025 · $117k · revenue +2%

Funded once

UR
UN RELIEF & WORKS AGENCY
one grant, 2022 · $35k
U(
UNRWA (UN RELIEF & WORKS AGENCY)
one grant, 2023 · $30k
PS
PUBLIC SAFETY CHAPLINS FIRST RESPONDER FOUNDATION
one grant, 2020 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Mobile Arts Council Inc

Mobile Arts Councils mission is to enrich the quality of life in the Mobile area through increasing accessibility to the arts and promoting a vibrant cultural community.

Arts & Culture

New Orleans Museum of Art

To inspire the love of art; to collect, preserve, exhibit and present excellence in the visual arts; to educate, challenge, and engage a diverse public.

Arts & Culture

Alabama Alliance Network

The alabama alliance netowrk works to strengthen and enhance alabama's civic society through research, education, and grantmaking

Public Benefit

Opera Birmingham Inc

Opera birmingham is committed to creating the finest professional opera productions, developing talent through competition and exposure to major artists, and promoting the operatic art form through community-wide education and outreach.

Arts & Culture

Alabama Association of Nonprofits

To strengthen the capacity of alabama's nonprofit sector through professional development, advocacy, and management support, all resulting in better communities and a stronger alabama.

Human Services

Mobile Symphony Inc

The purpose of the organization is to make lives better through music by producing and promoting symphonic music and delivering music education programs throughout Alabama and the Gulf Coast region.

Arts & Culture

Legal Services Alabama Inc

Legal services alabama is a statewide nonprofit dedicated to providing access to justice and quality civil legal assistance to educate and empower alabama's low-income community.

Crime & Legal

University of Alabama Alumni Association

To promote and encourage interest in the university of alabama through publications, reunions, and other activities.

Education

Mobile United Inc

To present a forum for business and citizens where an exchange of ideas can occur that will make Mobile a better place to live, work and do business.

Community Improvement

American Civil Liberties Union

The aclu of alabama battles to protect and expand the civil liberties and civil rights of alabamians.

—

Alabama Audubon

Promote conservation and greater knowledge of birds, their habitat and the natural world.

Environment

Leadership Alabama Inc

Improve state networking and relations among state leaders.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Domestic Workers Alliance Inc and the most unlike its peers is University of Mobile. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

4%2/57

the rest of the field

11%

206,162/1,819,508

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

54 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

51/54

Grantees still filing

43/54

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$2,531,804Education$401,713Arts & Culture$236,075Human Services$210,850Civil Rights$100,013Health$95,668Philanthropy$81,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ben May Charitable TrustAL31.1× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ben May Charitable Trust · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Crampton Trust #1255000731 · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Hearin - Chandler Foundation · J L Bedsole Foundation · Cd Helen and Jeff Glaze · Rjjb Family Foundation · Julien E Marx Foundation Trust · Mayer & Arlene Mitchell Charitable · The Miller Charitable Foundation Inc · As Mitchell Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation NAN H ALTMAYER CHARITABLE TRUST funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

4get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: BALDWIN COUNTY TRAILBLAZERS.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

high risk

3 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 631153663 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on BALDWIN COUNTY TRAILBLAZERS, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 17% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Nan H Altmayer Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Nan H Altmayer Charitable Trust through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

NAN H ALTMAYER CHARITABLE TRUST

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

54 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Nan H Altmayer Charitable Trust?

More from the funding graph

NAN H ALTMAYER CHARITABLE TRUST

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

54 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Nan H Altmayer Charitable Trust?

More from the funding graph