Skip to content

· Private foundation

Naddisy Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$611k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$325k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$7.6MHealth$4.8MFood & Nutrition$1.9MEducation$1.5MHuman Services$950kInternational$255kPhilanthropy$225kCivil Rights$50kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
  • $250k+1 grant · $325k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$25M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART$325,000
FOOD ALLERGY INITIATIVE$200,000
BEDFORD PLAYHOUSE$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY$25,000
SEEING EYE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
SCHWARZMAN ANIMAL CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $2.8M → 17%METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $1.2M → 17%METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $1.1M → 17%METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $1.1M → 17%METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $555k → 17%FOOD ALLERGY INITIATIVE: $510k → 17%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $500k → 17%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $500k → 17%LUCILLE PACKARD: $500k → 17%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $500k → 17%LUCILLE PACKARD: $500k → 17%LUCILLE PACKARD: $500k → 17%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $500k → 17%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $500k → 17%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $500k → 17%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $331k → 17%FOOD ALLERGY INITIATIVE: $330k → 17%METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $325k → 17%HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY: $325k → 17%HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY: $325k → 17%HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY: $325k → 17%HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY: $325k → 17%FOOD ALLERGY INITIATIVE: $300k → 17%HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY: $300k → 17%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $259k → 17%LUCILLE PACKARD FOUNDATION: $220k → 17%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $220k → 17%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $200k → 17%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $200k → 17%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $200k → 17%FOOD ALLERGY INITIATIVE: $200k → 17%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $200k → 17%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $200k → 17%FOOD ALLERGY INITIATIVE: $200k → 17%METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $150k → 17%FOOD ALLERGY INITIATIVE: $130k → 17%FOOD ALLERGY INITIATIVE: $128k → 17%MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $100k → 17%COVID RELIEF AND RECOVERY: $100k → 17%WILLIAMS COLLEGE: $100k → 17%WILLIAMS COLLEGE: $100k → 17%PROVIDENCE COLLEGE: $85k → 17%FOOD ALLERGY INITIATIVE: $77k → 17%ACTION AGAINST HUNGER: $75k → 17%BEDFORD PLAYHOUSE: $70k → 17%BEDFORD PLAYHOUSE: $66k → 17%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $65k → 17%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $65k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$18M · 16 repeat orgs$561k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
16

Total granted

$18M
$560k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+18%

Still filing today

25%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureInternationalHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART
    8× · 2017–2024 · $7.1M · revenue +58%
  • MS
    MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING
    6× · 2017–2022 · $3.0M
  • FA
    FOOD ALLERGY INITIATIVE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.9M

Funded once

  • LP
    LUCILLE PACKARD FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $220k
  • MO
    Museum of Modern Artgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +38%
  • CR
    COVID RELIEF AND RECOVERY
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
2
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
3
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
4
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
5
Philadelphia Museum of Art

The philadelphia museum of art - in partnership with the city, the region, and art museums around the globe - seeks to preserve, enhance, interpret, and extend the reach of its great collection in particular, and the visual arts in…

Arts & Culture
6
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
7
The Newark Museum Association

Nmoa mission statement is: we welcome everyone with inclusive experiences that spark curiosity and foster community.

Arts & Culture
8
Clyfford Still Museum

Home to the art and legacy of the american painter clyfford still, we invite all to explore the potential of individual creative endeavor.

Arts & Culture
9
Amigos Del Museo Del Barrio Inc El Museo Del Barrio

El museo's mission is to preserve, interpret, and promote the artistic heritage of puerto ricans and all latin americans in the united states by means of exhibitions, public programs, publications, and educational activities.

Arts & Culture
10
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
11
New Museum of Contemporary Art

A center for exhibitions, information, and documentation about living artists since 1977, which continues to be a place of experimentation and a hub of new art and new ideas.

Arts & Culture
12
The Museum of Fine Arts Houston

The museum of fine arts, houston serves as a welcoming and inclusive place for all people, connecting the communities of houston with diverse histories of art spanning 6,000 years and six continents. through our permanent collections,…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Museum of Modern Art; the most unlike its peers is National Dance Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $3,000,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERINGFOOD ALLERGY INITIATIVE: $1,874,500 · OtherFOOD ALLERGY INITIATIVEHOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY: $1,660,000 · OtherHOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERYIndividual grant recipient: $1,500,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSTANFORD UNIVERSITY: $1,000,000 · OtherSTANFORD UNIVERSITYRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $940,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE+18 more: $1,231,000 · Other+18 moreMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $7,125,000 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ARTBEDFORD PLAYHOUSE INC: $321,400 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $125,000 · Arts & CultureACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA: $255,000 · InternationalCALVARY FUND INC: $5,000 · HealthVILLAGE COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $5,000 · EducationTHE BOYS' CLUB OF NEW YORK: $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$11,205,500Arts & Culture$7,571,400International$255,000Health$5,000Education$5,000Youth Development$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $7,125,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetBEDFORD PLAYHOUSE INC: $321,400 over 8y, 6.1% of budgetACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA: $255,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL DANCE INSTITUTE: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JEWISH MUSEUM: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALVARY FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVILLAGE COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOYS' CLUB OF NEW YORK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds BEDFORD PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds ACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA ↗
  • Who funds Museum of Modern Art ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL DANCE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds CALVARY FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds VILLAGE COMMUNITY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE BOYS' CLUB OF NEW YORK ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Naddisy Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Naddisy Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Naddisy Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Naddisy Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Naddisy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph