Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Public charity

Nacdl Foundation for Criminal Justice

To preserve and promote the core values of america's justice system guaranteed by the constitution - among them due process, freedom from unreasonable search and seizure, fair sentencing and assistance of effective counsel - by educating the public and the legal profession to the role of these rights and values in a free society. The…

$2.7M
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
1
Grants FY2025
1
Organizations funded FY2024
0%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$2,722,985
Largest grant, FY2025
$2,722,985
Organizations funded a year
1 to 2
FY2017 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$5.5M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations Nacdl Foundation for Criminal Justice funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving1$2.7M0%
FY20241$2.7M0%
FY20231$2.7M0%
FY20222$3.3M50%
FY20212$2.7M50%
FY20201$1.5M0%
FY20191$1.1M0%
FY20171$706kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$18M

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers Inc$16,910,541830%
Regents of the University of California at Berkeley$480,0001n/a
Dreamorg$100,00010%

Compare Nacdl Foundation for Criminal Justice with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Nacdl Foundation for Criminal Justice?

Find your warmest path to Nacdl Foundation for Criminal Justice through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Nacdl Foundation for Criminal Justice

How much does Nacdl Foundation for Criminal Justice give?
Nacdl Foundation for Criminal Justice reported 1 grants totaling $2,722,985 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 2 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2024.
What does Nacdl Foundation for Criminal Justice fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Crime & Legal (100%).
Who are Nacdl Foundation for Criminal Justice's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers Inc ($17M), Regents of the University of California at Berkeley ($480k), Dreamorg ($100k).
Does Nacdl Foundation for Criminal Justice fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is Nacdl Foundation for Criminal Justice based?
Nacdl Foundation for Criminal Justice is based in DC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 4 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nacdl Foundation for Criminal Justice’s filings →

More from the funding graph