Skip to content
N'Ve Shalom Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

N'Ve Shalom Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$214k
Granted FY2024still arriving
58
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$594kHealth$116kPhilanthropy$98kHuman Services$69kEducation$23kInternational$21kArts & Culture$20kCivil Rights$11kOther$0
02FY2024 · 58 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k54 grants · $169k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $45k
$3,600
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION EMANU-EL OF WESTCHESTER$15,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEHEBAR SEPHARDIC CENTER$10,000
SEPHARDIC TORAH CENTER$10,000
UJA FEDERATION OF NEW YORK$10,000
YESHIVA ATERET TORAH$8,600
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ARAM SOBA$7,800
SYNAGOGUE OF DEAL$6,581
Individual grant recipient$6,500
Individual grant recipient$6,200
THE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER$6,000
MIRRER YESHIVA CENTRAL INSTITUTE$5,200
Individual grant recipient$5,200
SIMHA ORGANIZATION$5,200
MORRIS I FRANCO CANCER CENTER$5,200
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MERKAZ HATORAH$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 58% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DEEDLY INC: $1k → 15%THE SPECIAL CHILDREN'S CENTER: $5k → 11%AHAVAT HAIM VACHESED: $5k → 6%AHAVAT HAIM VACHESED: $4k → 6%AHAVAT HAIM VACHESED: $4k → 6%BONEI OLAM: $3k → 20%BETH OLOTH: $500 → 20%BETH OLOTH: $500 → 20%BETH OLOTH: $500 → 20%MOISE SAFRA COMMUNITY CENTER: $18k → 17%BETH OLOTH: $500 → 20%MOISE SAFRA COMMUNITY CENTER: $300 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
NJ
CA
VA
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$883k · 53 repeat orgs$194k to everyone else

53 repeat relationships: 38 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

53
39

Total granted

$883k
$122k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+36%

Still filing today

40%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $73k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesReligionHealthInternationalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $92k · revenue +39%
  • SF
    SAFE FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $46k · revenue +79%
  • AF
    American Friends of Merkaz Hatorah
    8× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • MD
    MAGEN DAVID YESHIVAH
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    one grant, 2023 · $9k · revenue -33%
  • MD
    MAGEN DAVID
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
3
Sherit Isroel
—
4
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
5
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
6
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
7
University of Judaism Foundation
—
8
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
9
American Friends of Yeshivat Nachalat Yossef

The organization will provide financial assistance to educational institutions that promote the observance of the jewish religion, its laws and traditions, and sacred texts, including yeshivat nachalat yossef, located in jerusalem, israel.

Religion
10
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
11
Yad Yosef Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mesorah Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Lung Cancer Research Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 112 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/42
Grantees still filing
31/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAFE FOUNDATION INC: $45,600 · OtherSAFE FOUNDATION INCAmerican Friends of Merkaz Hatorah: $40,000 · OtherAmerican Friends of Merkaz HatorahMORRIS I FRANCO CANCER CENTER: $33,800 · OtherMORRIS I FRANCO CANCER CENTERTHE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $23,560 · OtherSYNAGOGUE OF DEAL: $23,381 · OtherATERET TORAH CENTER: $21,801 · Other+78 more: $429,087 · Other+78 moreOZAR HATORAH INC: $200,000 · ReligionOZAR HATORAH INCAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ARAM SOBA: $10,400 · Religion+3 more: $8,900 · ReligionUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $91,800 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEW…KEREN HAYESHIVOT TRUST: $9,102 · PhilanthropyKEREN HAYE…MOISE SAFRA COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $18,300 · Human ServicesAHAVAT HAIM VACHESED: $12,400 · Human ServicesTHE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $5,200 · Human ServicesBonei Olam Inc: $2,600 · Human ServicesBETH OLOTH: $2,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesHASBARA FELLOWSHIPS INCORPORATED: $10,800 · EducationYESHIVA KETER TORAH INC: $7,600 · EducationBET YAAKOV OF THE JERSEY SHORE INC: $7,200 · EducationBET MIDRASH OHEL TORAH: $2,600 · EducationSEPHARDIC ACADEMY OF MANHATTAN INC: $2,400 · EducationMABAS FUND INC: $2,000 · Education+2 more: $1,201 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEHEBAR SEPHARDIC CENTER INC: $22,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $8,600 · InternationalWOMEN'S INTERNATIONAL ZIONIST ORGANIZATION: $2,000 · InternationalSIMHA ORGANIZATION INC: $13,000 · HealthNew York Cancer Center Inc: $7,800 · HealthHATZOLAH EMERGENCY AIR RESPONSE TEAM INC: $7,200 · HealthLUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $4,501 · Health
Other$617,229Religion$219,300Philanthropy$100,902Human Services$41,500Education$33,801International$32,600Health$32,501

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOZAR HATORAH INC: $200,000 over 5y, 76% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $91,800 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE FOUNDATION INC: $45,600 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetAmerican Friends of Merkaz Hatorah: $40,000 over 8y, 9.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEHEBAR SEPHARDIC CENTER INC: $22,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetMOISE SAFRA COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $18,300 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSIMHA ORGANIZATION INC: $13,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAHAVAT HAIM VACHESED: $12,400 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetHASBARA FELLOWSHIPS INCORPORATED: $10,800 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetOR HACHAYIM INC: $10,800 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ARAM SOBA: $10,400 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetKEREN HAYESHIVOT TRUST: $9,102 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM INC: $8,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $8,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROPEL NETWORK INC: $8,400 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetNew York Cancer Center Inc: $7,800 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYESHIVA KETER TORAH INC: $7,600 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBET YAAKOV OF THE JERSEY SHORE INC: $7,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHATZOLAH EMERGENCY AIR RESPONSE TEAM INC: $7,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEXCEED NETWORK: $7,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE A CHILD'S HEART FOUNDATION US INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $4,501 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S AND YOUNG WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Partisan Education Foundation: $3,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBET MIDRASH OHEL TORAH: $2,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPorat Yoseph Foundation: $2,600 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $2,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $2,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEPHARDIC ACADEMY OF MANHATTAN INC: $2,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMABAS FUND INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S INTERNATIONAL ZIONIST ORGANIZATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETH OLOTH: $2,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHALSHELET SEMINARY INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYESHIVAT OR HACHAIM OF LAKEWOOD INC: $1,001 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetZICHRON TZVI ELIMELECH: $501 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA ZICHRON MAYIR: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OZAR HATORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Merkaz Hatorah ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEHEBAR SEPHARDIC CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MOISE SAFRA COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SIMHA ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AHAVAT HAIM VACHESED ↗
  • Who funds HASBARA FELLOWSHIPS INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds OR HACHAYIM INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ARAM SOBA ↗
  • Who funds KEREN HAYESHIVOT TRUST ↗
  • Who funds THE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds PROPEL NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds New York Cancer Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA KETER TORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds BET YAAKOV OF THE JERSEY SHORE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Adjmi Family Fou…The Howard Hoffman & …The Amin and Lillian …Jewish Communal FundThe Jimmy and Berta K…The Ralph S Gindi Fam…The Setton FoundationIsaac & Marjorie Gind…Cabasso Family Founda…Albert & Melissa Sutt…Ralph J Harary Founda…Chehebar Family Found…
Jack Adjmi Family Foundation IncNY67.7× affinity34 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation · The Setton Foundation · Isaac & Marjorie Gindi Foundation Inc · Cabasso Family Foundation · Albert & Melissa Sutton Foundation · Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc · Chehebar Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization N'Ve Shalom Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from N'Ve Shalom Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Bet Yaakov of the Jersey Shore Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc: 8% of income from government
  • The Special Children Center: 5% of income from government
  • Mesorah Heritage Foundation: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 112 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on N'Ve Shalom’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home