How much did N Eric & Olga N Jorgensen Family grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 76% of N Eric & Olga N Jorgensen Family’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2021

—

2022

boca balletballet theatrerussian

2023

ballet

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k5 grants · $10k
$10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$50k–250k1 grant · $52k

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

Total assets

Largest grants

THE BESSEMER GIVING FUND$52,135
BOCA BALLET THEATRE COMPANY$15,000
YOUTH AMERICA GRAND PRIX INC$15,000
MIAMI CITY BALLET INC$5,000
PALM BEACH OPERA INC$2,500
OPERATION MOBILIZATION$1,000
THE BESSEMER GIVING FUND$969
FRIENDS OF FELINES INC$500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 12%. 16% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

22%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$101k · 6 repeat orgs$366k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$101k

$312k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%

+95%

Still filing today

100%

50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $54k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Arts & CultureReligionInternationalAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

YA
YOUTH AMERICA GRAND PRIX INC
3× · 2022–2024 · $35k · revenue +73%
BB
BOCA BALLET THEATRE COMPANY
3× · 2022–2024 · $30k · revenue +39%
MC
MIAMI CITY BALLET INC
3× · 2022–2024 · $15k · revenue +35%

Funded once

BR
BOCA RATON ARTS DISTRICT EXPLORATORY CORPORATION
one grant, 2021 · $300k
RC
RUSSIAN CHILDRENS WELFARE SOCIETY INC
one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -66%
AO
ART OF LIVING FOUNDATION
one grant, 2022 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Ballet Palm Beach Inc

An organization committed to preserving the art of classical ballet, enriching the commmunity through the beauty of ballet, and impacting young lives through the discipline of dance.

Arts & Culture

Marat Daukayev Ballet Theatre Inc

Arts & Culture

Florida Classical Ballet Inc

Classical ballet

Arts & Culture

Florida Ballet At Jacksonville Inc

The mission of the florida ballet is to enrich and inspire the cultural landscape of our community through the education and art of classical ballet.

—

Fadeyev Ballet Inc

The organization provides art education and awareness by teaching youths the art of ballet, as well as other dance skills, and connects members of the Long Island community through dance.

Arts & Culture

Cuban Classical Ballet of Miami Inc

Ballet company performances of the best quality repertoire

Arts & Culture

Olympic Ballet Theatre

Our mission is to develop, sustain, and provide professional dance to public and school audiences in the Puget Sound area, to promote dance as a creative performing art, and to engage the widest possible audience with a stimulating…

—

City Ballet Inc

The mission of City Ballet is to provide excellence in professional ballet for cultural enhancement through performances, education and outreach programs to diverse communities and audiences.

Arts & Culture

Santa Barbara Festival Ballet

To enrich the community through artistic presentations and instruction.

Arts & Culture

Naples Ballet and Company Inc

Provide dancers of all ages with professional dance instruction and performance opportunities

Arts & Culture

Eglevsky Ballet Company of Li Inc

The Eglevsky Ballet Company is dedicated to enriching Long Island and it's surrounding communities through the presentation and training of ballet in the classical tradition of its founder to the highest standards.

—

Central Florida Ballet Inc

Central florida ballet's mission is to entertain, educate, and inspire through the universal art form of dance. with a diverse repertoire of dance productions and programs from classical to contemporary and beyond, each attendee is to be…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Palm Beach Opera Inc and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Felines Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

8/8

Grantees still filing

6/8

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$355,104Arts & Culture$88,500Religion$12,000International$10,000Animals$1,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation N Eric & Olga N Jorgensen Family funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: RUSSIAN SAINT MATRONA FOUNDATION CORPORATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~3 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 9 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

9 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.3× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 800772185 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on RUSSIAN SAINT MATRONA FOUNDATION CORPORATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 3 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 3% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to N Eric & Olga N Jorgensen Family?

Find your warmest path to N Eric & Olga N Jorgensen Family through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

N Eric & Olga N Jorgensen Family

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to N Eric & Olga N Jorgensen Family?

More from the funding graph

N Eric & Olga N Jorgensen Family

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to N Eric & Olga N Jorgensen Family?

More from the funding graph