Skip to content
Mymichigan Medical Center Saginaw Founda at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Mymichigan Medical Center Saginaw Founda

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes by conducting or supporting activites exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the charitable, educational and scientific purposes of mymichigan medical center saginaw.

$295k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$272k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$13MHuman Services$750kReligion$150kPhilanthropy$15kRecreation & Sports$12k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
  • $250k+1 grant · $272k
$11,962
Median grant
1
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MYMICHIGAN MEDICAL CENTER SAGINAW$271,694
MYMICHIGAN HEALTH$11,962
MYMICHIGAN MEDICAL CENTER STANDISH$10,516
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $750k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%REGION VII AREA AGENCY ON AGING INC: $500k → 14%REGION VII AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $174k → 14%REGION VII AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $76k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14M · 5 repeat orgs$459k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against -30% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
3

Total granted

$14M
$175k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
-30%

Still filing today

80%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 4% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $284k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    MYMICHIGAN MEDICAL CENTER SAGINAW
    8× · 2017–2024 · $11M · revenue +24%
  • MM
    MYMICHIGAN MEDICAL CENTER STANDISH
    7× · 2018–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +32%
  • RV
    REGION VII AREA AGENCY ON AGING
    3× · 2019–2022 · $750k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • CD
    CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF SAGINAW
    one grant, 2018 · $150k
  • EU
    ELSA U PARDEE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue -30%
  • HF
    HENRY FORD SEMI MEDICAL GROUP
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -30%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mymichigan Medical Center Tawas Foundati

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes by conducting or supporting activites exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the…

Health
2
Mymichigan Medical Group

Creating healthy communities - together

Health
3
Mymichigan Medical Center Midland

Creating healthy communities - together

Health
4
Mymichigan Medical Center Tawas

Creating healthy communities - together

Health
5
Mymichigan Medical Center Alma

Creating healthy communities - together

Health
6
Mymichigan Health Foundation

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes by conducting or supporting activites exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the…

Health
7
Mclaren Northern Michigan

Mclaren health care, through its subsidiaries, will be the best value in health care as defined by quality outcomes and cost.

Health
8
Mymichigan Medical Center Clare

Creating healthy communities - together

—
9
Mymichigan Medical Center Alpena

Creating healthy communities - together

Health
10
Mymichigan Medical Center Gladwin

Creating healthy communities - together

Health
11
Mclaren Thumb Region

Mclaren thumb region is committed to providing excellence in healthcare to our communities in a caring, compassionate manner.

Health
12
Mercy Harvard Hospital Inc

The mission of mercy harvard hospital, inc. (mhh) is "exceptional health care services with a passion for making lives better." the foundation of this mission is based on a vision of quality: excellence in patient care; service:…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mymichigan Medical Center Saginaw; the most unlike its peers is Elsa U Pardee Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MYMICHIGAN MEDICAL CENTER SAGINAW: $11,259,320 · HealthMYMICHIGAN MEDICAL CENTER SAGINAWMYMICHIGAN MEDICAL CENTER STANDISH: $1,898,950 · HealthMYMICHIGAN MEDICAL CENTER STANDISH+4 more: $312,522 · HealthREGION VII AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $750,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC DIOCESE OF SAGINAW: $150,000 · OtherELSA U PARDEE FOUNDATION: $15,000 · OtherSAGINAW SPIRIT HOCKEY CLUB: $12,000 · Other
Health$13,470,792Human Services$750,000Other$177,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMYMICHIGAN MEDICAL CENTER SAGINAW: $11,259,320 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetMYMICHIGAN MEDICAL CENTER STANDISH: $1,898,950 over 7y, 4.2% of budgetREGION VII AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $750,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetMYMICHIGAN MEDICAL CENTER SAGINAW FOUNDA: $271,694 over 1y, 16% of budgetFIELD NEUROSCIENCES INSTITUTE: $18,540 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetMYMICHIGAN HEALTH: $11,962 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHENRY FORD SEMI MEDICAL GROUP: $10,326 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mymichigan Medical Center Saginaw Founda funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mymichigan Medical Center Saginaw Founda. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mymichigan Medical Center Saginaw Founda’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home