Skip to content

· Public charity

Mybridge

Our purpose is to serve as a Kingdom Catalyst, helping to accelerate evangelistic ministry and movements by identifying, unlocking and leveraging high-octane catalytic domains, which are MyBridge Radio, MyBridge Momentum and MyBridge to the Nations - Activate Global.

$411k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $125,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $410,510 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $285,510 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$100,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Collage Center$100,000
Elevate Global$25,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Elevate Global: $25k → 13%Collage Center: $100k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $275k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 3 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

South Asia$182k · 66% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: Funds covered expenses for running business and disciple-making training courses across NFT Pakistan. Completing these courses was required before participants could receive economic development grants. These funds also supported church planting and leadership development efforts across the region. In total, NFT Pakistan supported 93 trainings, equipped 703 leaders, saw 181 disciples made or believers baptized, formed 46 discovery groups, planted 13 churches, and engaged 29 new people groups. · Expenses supported business and disciple-making training courses for participants, which were required before receiving economic development and training grants to start small businesses. After completing the business training course, participants received grants to launch or strengthen businesses. These funds helped start or strengthen 33 businesses, host 60 trainings, equip 1,351 leaders, see 204 disciples made or believers baptized, form 48 discovery groups, plant 33 churches, and engage 12 new people groups. · Expenses were used to support a vocational training center for participants who completed church planting and business training. After graduation, participants entered a six-month skills training program in a trade of their choice, including electrical work, welding, woodworking, and English language tutoring. This year, the work helped start or strengthen 21 businesses, train 21 leaders, see 183 disciples made or believers baptized, and plant 38 churches. These expenses also included stipends for 2 staff members in India.

Sub-Saharan Africa$84k · 31% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: Funds covered expenses for running the business and disciple-making training courses. Completing these courses was required before participants could receive economic development grants. After finishing the training, participants received grants to start small businesses if they had a qualified business plan and strategy. These funds helped start or strengthen 20 businesses in Chad, support 11 trainings, equip 533 leaders, see 13 disciples made or believers baptized, form 125 discovery groups, and plant 18 churches. · Funds covered expenses for running the business and disciple-making training courses. Completing these courses was required before participants could receive economic development grants. After finishing the training, participants received grants to start small businesses if they had a qualified business plan and strategy. These funds helped start or strengthen 49 businesses in Nigeria, support 14 trainings, equip 411 leaders, see 67 disciples made or believers baptized, form 3 discovery groups, and strengthen ministry engagement in the region. · Funds covered expenses for running the business and disciple-making training courses. Completing these courses was required before participants could receive economic development grants. After finishing the training, participants received grants to start small businesses if they had a qualified business plan and strategy. These funds helped start or strengthen 9 businesses in Ethiopia, support 4 trainings, equip 83 leaders, see 46 disciples made or believers baptized, form 15 discovery groups, and plant 9 churches.

Middle East and North Africa$8k · 3% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Funds covered expenses for running business and disciple-making efforts. Completing the training process was required before participants could receive economic development grants. After finishing the training, participants with a qualified business plan and strategy received grants to start small businesses. These funds helped start or strengthen 6 businesses in Egypt, equip 4 leaders, see 25 disciples made or believers baptized, and plant 4 churches.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its field
03the grantee network

2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/2
Grantees still filing
0/2
Grew since first funded

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOLLAGE CENTER: $100,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetELEVATE GLOBAL: $25,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mybridge funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mybridge. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mybridge?

    Find your warmest path to Mybridge through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 2 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mybridge’s filings →

    More from the funding graph