Skip to content

· Private foundation

My 613 Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$483k
Granted FY2025still arriving
38
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$182k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Religion$1.4MPhilanthropy$54kHuman Services$24kYouth Development$14kHealth$7kEmployment$6kEducation$5kInternational$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $57k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $243k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $182k
$3,605
Median grant
3
States reached
$2k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Yeshivat Darche Eres$182,499
Chasdei Yitzchok$31,000
Congregation Chazon Nuchem Shadik$27,000
Khal Ohr Levana$26,200
Shimis Shul Inc$25,000
TOV$24,000
Bnei Yosef$20,378
Sephardic Bikur Holim$18,000
Joseph Smouha Torah Center$17,704
Agudat Refua Vchaim$12,000
Tehilot Israel$12,000
Chabad TCI$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Yeshivat Ohel Torah$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,019
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Chaim Medical Resource: $1k → 14%Sephardic Bikur Holim: $18k → 20%Netzach Foundation: $2k → 11%Sephardic Bikur Holim: $2k → 20%Emahot Foundation: $1k → 20%Bonei Olam: $500 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 37 repeat orgs$362k to everyone else

37 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
57

Total granted

$1.1M
$225k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+5%

Still filing today

22%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $138k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YD
    YESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $520k · revenue +119%
  • TI
    TEHILOT ISRAEL INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $52k · revenue +149%
  • KB
    KOLLEL BAIS YOSEF INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $22k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $42k
  • BH
    Bais Hatavshil
    one grant, 2023 · $11k
  • NY
    NECHOMAS YISROEL
    one grant, 2022 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
2
Yeshiva Shaar Hatalmud

Providing jewish education to high school age students.

Education
3
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
4
Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc

Providing secular and religious education for elementary and high school aged students

Education
5
Yeshiva Bais Mordechai of Teaneck

To provide religious Jewish education.

Education
6
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
7
Mesivta Keren Orah

To conduct and maintain a religious school in accordance with the tenets, traditions and precepts of the orthodox jewish faith.

Education
8
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
9
Yeshiva Ohr Yehuda Inc

Providing religious and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
10
Yeshiva Nesivos Hatorah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
11
Kerem Bais Yaakov Seminary Inc

Kerem bais yaakov seminary is a religious institution with traditional values dedicated to advancing students in classical torah studies while establishing a torah outlook that students can apply to daily life. the curriculum enhances…

Religion
12
Yeshiva Beit Rafael

Religious & charitable- to provide funds to enable the study of torah.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshivat Yagdil Torah Inc; the most unlike its peers is TorahAnytimeCom Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 112 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
18/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TOV: $66,800 · OtherTOVBNEI YOSEF: $50,889 · OtherBNEI YOSEFIndividual grant recipient: $41,666 · OtherCONGREGATION CHAZON NUCHEM SHADIK INC: $37,000 · OtherATERET TORAH CENTER: $33,868 · OtherJoseph Smouha Torah Center: $32,507 · OtherChasdei Yitzchok: $31,000 · OtherYAD YOSEF: $30,700 · Other+75 more: $469,353 · Other+75 moreYESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC: $519,995 · ReligionYESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INCKOLLEL BAIS YOSEF INC: $21,600 · ReligionYESHIVAT OHEL TORAH: $20,311 · Religion+4 more: $11,701 · ReligionTEHILOT ISRAEL INC: $52,400 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KOL REPHAEL INC: $2,600 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,448 · PhilanthropySEPHARDIC BET YAAKOV INC: $6,000 · EducationYESHIVAT OR HACHAIM OF LAKEWOOD INC: $5,400 · EducationHKY KOL YAAKAB INC: $4,500 · EducationLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $3,605 · EducationNJ RISING STARS INC: $3,600 · EducationYESHIVAT YAGDIL TORAH INC: $3,600 · EducationILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $1,800 · Education+3 more: $1,600 · EducationSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE NETZACH FOUNDATION INC: $1,800 · Human ServicesCHAIM MEDICAL RESOURCE INC: $1,001 · Human ServicesEMAHOT FOUNDATION INC: $1,001 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesKEREN EZER LNEFESH: $4,550 · HealthAMUDIM COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $3,600 · HealthCHAVERIM ISRAEL FAMILY SERVICES INC: $5,500 · EmploymentYTI ORG: $4,500 · Youth Development
Other$793,783Religion$573,607Philanthropy$56,448Education$30,105Human Services$24,302Health$8,150Employment$5,500Youth Development$4,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTEHILOT ISRAEL INC: $52,400 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetKOLLEL BAIS YOSEF INC: $21,600 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetYESHIVAT OHEL TORAH: $20,311 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTZUR FOUNDATION INC: $5,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAVERIM ISRAEL FAMILY SERVICES INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetYESHIVAT OR HACHAIM OF LAKEWOOD INC: $5,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ARAM SOBA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKEREN EZER LNEFESH: $4,550 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYTI ORG: $4,500 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetHKY KOL YAAKAB INC: $4,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMUDIM COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $3,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNJ RISING STARS INC: $3,600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYESHIVAT YAGDIL TORAH INC: $3,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KOL REPHAEL INC: $2,600 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetTHE NETZACH FOUNDATION INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $1,448 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAIM MEDICAL RESOURCE INC: $1,001 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMAHOT FOUNDATION INC: $1,001 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHEMIRAS SEDORIM INC: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBET MIDRASH OHEL TORAH: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF YAD NAFTALI: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC ↗
  • Who funds TEHILOT ISRAEL INC ↗
  • Who funds KOLLEL BAIS YOSEF INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAT OHEL TORAH ↗
  • Who funds SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Adjmi Family Foundation IncNY73.7× affinity37 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Setton Foundation · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · Cabasso Family Foundation · The Adjmi-Dwek Foundation Inc · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc · Mary & Abe Sutton Foundation · The Safdeye Brothers Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization My 613 Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from My 613 Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 140%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Yeshivat Yagdil Torah Inc: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
14get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 112 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on My 613’s filings →

More from the funding graph