Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

Kansas · Public charity

Music Ecosystems and Artist Development Organization of Wichita Inc

To develop a thriving and self-sustaining musical community within and around wichita, kansas through the creation of infrastructure, education, and resources focused on musical performance and education, all on a nonprofit basis. In order to help musicians be part of a vibrant musical (continued on schedule o)

$116k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
3
Itemized grants FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$107k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$38,404
Largest grant, FY2024
$48,322
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$485k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2024 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Rudy Love & The Encore LLC$48,3221n/a
Social Cinema$38,4041n/a
Keo & Them$19,9081n/a

Compare Music Ecosystems and Artist Development Organization of Wichita Inc with peer funders

About Music Ecosystems and Artist Development Organization of Wichita Inc

How much does Music Ecosystems and Artist Development Organization of Wichita Inc give?
Music Ecosystems and Artist Development Organization of Wichita Inc reported 3 itemized grants totaling $106,634, out of $115,906 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing.
What does Music Ecosystems and Artist Development Organization of Wichita Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2024 to FY2024, its largest causes are Arts & Culture (100%).
Who are Music Ecosystems and Artist Development Organization of Wichita Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2024 to FY2024: Rudy Love & The Encore LLC ($48k), Social Cinema ($38k), Keo & Them ($20k).
Where is Music Ecosystems and Artist Development Organization of Wichita Inc based?
Music Ecosystems and Artist Development Organization of Wichita Inc is based in KS.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 3 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Music Ecosystems and Artist Development Organization of Wichita’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home