Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

Massachusetts · Public charity

Muddy Pond Trust Inc Attention Charles Smith

Muddy pond trust was organized for charitable, educational and scientific purposes, including, but not limited to, creating a nature center, hosting and sponsoring programs to educate the public about the natural world and sustainable living and conserving and undertaking research on a parcel of land with a globally rare ecosystem and…

$86k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
3
Grants FY2024
1
Organizations funded FY2021
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$28,600
Largest grant, FY2024
$28,600
States reached, FY2024
1
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$57kEnvironment$39k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Herring Pond Wampanoag Tribe Inc$28,60018%
Native Land Conservancy Inc$28,60010%
Indigenous Resources Collaborative$28,6001n/a
Native Land Conservancy Inc$10,0002n/a

Compare Muddy Pond Trust Inc Attention Charles Smith with peer funders

About Muddy Pond Trust Inc Attention Charles Smith

How much does Muddy Pond Trust Inc Attention Charles Smith give?
Muddy Pond Trust Inc Attention Charles Smith reported 3 grants totaling $85,800 in its FY2024 IRS filing.
What does Muddy Pond Trust Inc Attention Charles Smith fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2024, its largest causes are Arts & Culture (60%), Environment (40%).
Who are Muddy Pond Trust Inc Attention Charles Smith's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2024: Herring Pond Wampanoag Tribe Inc ($29k), Native Land Conservancy Inc ($29k), Indigenous Resources Collaborative ($29k).
Where is Muddy Pond Trust Inc Attention Charles Smith based?
Muddy Pond Trust Inc Attention Charles Smith is based in MA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 4 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Muddy Pond Trust Inc Attention Charles Smith’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home