· Public charity
Mt Hope Charities Inc
To streamline the process for local benefit/fundraising events by depositing funds and making the process easier for people holding benefit/fndraiser while eliminating the need for a separate account for each event.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $16k
- $10k–50k19 grants · $502k
- $50k–250k24 grants · $2.4M
- $250k+7 grants · $2.9M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MT HOPE MIDDLE EAST CHURCH # 125 | $750,000 |
| HOSTETLER NE CHURCH DISTRICT #134-1 | $646,000 |
| HOSTETLER MIDDLE WEST CHURCH | $351,586 |
| MT HOPE MIDDLE NORTHEAST CHURCH | $339,000 |
| UNION VALLEY WEST CHURCH# 183 | $294,000 |
| MT EATON EAST CHURCH #115 | $262,290 |
| MT HOPE WEST CHURCH #123 | $254,500 |
| TRAIL WEST CHURCH # 78 | $210,000 |
| JERICHO AMISH CHURCH #110 | $207,769 |
| MT HOPE VALLEY CHURCH#119-2 | $167,000 |
| WISE EAST CHURCH# 41 | $154,580 |
| BECKS MILL EAST CHURCH | $145,364 |
| HARRISON RD NORTH CHURCH #148-1 | $140,324 |
| WINESBURG NEW ORDER CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP | $136,179 |
| KIDRON RD EAST CHURCH # 154 | $136,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
56 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2025, 31 since wound down; 28 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.7M went to new ones.
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- FEFAIRVIEW EAST CHURCH #994× · 2021–2024 · $932k
- FSFREDERICKSBURG SOUTHWEST CHURCH5× · 2021–2025 · $840k
- MHMT HOPE CHURCH #1952× · 2024–2025 · $750k
Funded once
- HNHOSTETLER NORTHWEST CHURCHone grant, 2024 · $860k
- WEWISE EAST CHURCH #141one grant, 2022 · $475k
- CRCHERRY RIDGE CHURCHone grant, 2021 · $290k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2021–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2021 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 154 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Mt Hope Charities Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mt Hope Charities Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Mt Hope Charities Inc?
Find your warmest path to Mt Hope Charities Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Mt Hope Charities’ filings →