· Public charity
Msworld Inc
To end the isolation that people feel when diagnosed with multiple sclerosis and to provide group therapy for those persons who have, are recovering from or support someone who has multiple sclerosis(ms)
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GREENHILL HUMANE SOCIETY SPCA | $7,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2018–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2018 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Msworld Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Msworld Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
- Greenhill Humane Society Spca: 3% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Msworld Inc?
Find your warmest path to Msworld Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.