Skip to content

· Private foundation

MPS Foundation Inc

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$65k
Granted FY2022
77
Grants FY2022
5
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What it funds
0177% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2022.

Religion$135kEducation$5kHuman Services$2kPhilanthropy$2kHealth$1kYouth Development$313Food & Nutrition$252Housing & Shelter$200Other$0
02FY2022 · 77 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k76 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $31k
$200
Median grant
5
States reached
$17k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Yad Yosef$31,033
Magen Avraham$4,400
Individual grant recipient$2,683
Nir L'Shimon$2,600
Shuvu$1,939
Limudei Daas$1,800
Shaare Torah$1,800
Lev Chana$1,799
Keren Hashviis$1,200
Yeshivat Ateret Torah$1,050
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Yeshivat Mekor Haim$720
Mabas Fund$700
Bet Yaacov of the Jersey Shore$660
Magen David Congregation of Surfside$619
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Ahavas Tzedokos: $252 → 11%The Special Children Center: $72 → 11%A Time: $200 → 20%Kimpatorin Aid: $101 → 20%Kimpatorin Aid: $101 → 20%A Time: $100 → 20%Misaskim: $252 → 20%Bonei Olam: $59 → 20%Misaskim: $250 → 20%TAG Flatbush: $1k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$135k · 41 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +91% since the first grant, against +43% for those funded once.

41 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2022, 10 since wound down; 46 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
39

Total granted

$135k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+91%
+43%

Still filing today

37%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22
ReligionEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    MIKVAH USA INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $15k · revenue +121%
  • YY
    YESHIVAT YAGDIL TORAH INC
    3× · 2019–2022 · $2k · revenue +108%
  • TL
    TORAH LEARNING RESOURCES LTD
    3× · 2019–2022 · $2k · revenue +91%

Funded once

  • V
    Various
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
  • CV
    Chaim Vachesed
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • CH
    CHEVRA HATZALAH
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
3
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
4
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
5
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
7
Yeshiva Chayei Olam

Yeshiva chayei olam inc., was established for the purpose of having an orthodox jewish high school. the school teaches talumdic studies, talmudic jurasprudence, orthodox jewish ethics and the old testament. in addition, the school provides…

Education
8
Yeshiva Keren Hatorah of Passaic- Clifton

To operate a high school offering religious instruction and general studies as well as a post high school program of talmudic studies. the school shall be run under the standards of orthodox jewish law and tradition.

Education
9
Yeshiva Yesodei Hachaim

To provide secondary high school education in Brooklyn, NY

—
10
Yeshiva Derech Hatorah-Yeshivat Mizrachi Lbanim

A school-section 170(b)(1)(a)(ii), operating from the preschool pre-k level through high school, and chartered ny the new york state education department and board of regents.

Education
11
Mesivta Keren Orah

To conduct and maintain a religious school in accordance with the tenets, traditions and precepts of the orthodox jewish faith.

Education
12
Ohr Yisrael Yeshiva Inc

Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshivat Yagdil Torah Inc; the most unlike its peers is Camp Extreme D/B/a Project Extreme. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 126 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/36
Grantees still filing
29/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YAD YOSEF: $56,368 · OtherYAD YOSEFSEPHARDIC TORAH CENTER: $10,701 · OtherSEPHARDIC TORAH CENTERMagen Avraham: $5,101 · OtherNIR LSHIMON INC: $4,800 · Other+88 more: $56,059 · Other+88 moreMIKVAH USA INC: $15,254 · ReligionMIKVAH USA INCLIMUDEI DA'AS INC: $1,800 · ReligionLIMUDEI DA'AS I…TORAH LEARNING RESOURCES LTD: $1,656 · ReligionTORAH LEARNING …KEREN HASHVIIS INC: $1,200 · ReligionYeshivat Lev Torah: $961 · Religion+7 more: $1,786 · Religion+7 moreYESHIVAT YAGDIL TORAH INC: $1,752 · EducationMABAS FUND INC: $1,562 · EducationBET YAAKOV OF THE JERSEY SHORE INC: $1,474 · EducationYESHIVA KETER TORAH INC: $968 · EducationBET MIDRASH OHEL TORAH: $501 · EducationILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $451 · EducationMAOR YESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL INC: $353 · EducationTHE BRIDGE ACADEMY INC: $301 · Education+2 more: $201 · EducationTAG FLATBUSH INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesMISASKIM CORP: $502 · Human ServicesA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $300 · Human ServicesAHAVAS TZEDOKOS CORP: $252 · Human ServicesKIMPATORIN AID INC: $202 · Human Services+2 more: $131 · Human ServicesSHUVU RETURN INC: $1,939 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF SHEARIM HAMETSUYANIMINC: $252 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MISHKAN SHAUL INC: $101 · PhilanthropyCAMP EXTREME D/B/A PROJECT EXTREME: $101 · Youth DevelopmentCHAI LIFELINE INC: $101 · Health
Other$133,029Religion$22,657Education$7,563Human Services$2,387Philanthropy$2,292Youth Development$101Health$101

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMIKVAH USA INC: $15,254 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSHUVU RETURN INC: $1,939 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVAT YAGDIL TORAH INC: $1,752 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTORAH LEARNING RESOURCES LTD: $1,656 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMABAS FUND INC: $1,562 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBET YAAKOV OF THE JERSEY SHORE INC: $1,474 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN HASHVIIS INC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTAG FLATBUSH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYESHIVA KETER TORAH INC: $968 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYeshivat Lev Torah: $961 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYL HEARTS Inc: $550 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetMISASKIM CORP: $502 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBET MIDRASH OHEL TORAH: $501 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $451 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVAT OHEL TORAH: $431 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAOR YESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL INC: $353 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRIDGE ACADEMY INC: $301 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF SHEARIM HAMETSUYANIMINC: $252 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAHAVAS TZEDOKOS CORP: $252 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZICHRON ELIYAHU INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIMPATORIN AID INC: $202 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTorahAnytimeCom Inc: $202 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Kol Yehuda Inc: $202 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MISHKAN SHAUL INC: $101 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP EXTREME D/B/A PROJECT EXTREME: $101 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $101 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEICHAL HATORAH: $101 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA SHAAREI ARAZIM: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN CHAIM ZANVIL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $72 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA ZICHRON MAYIR: $60 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $59 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MIKVAH USA INC ↗
  • Who funds SHUVU RETURN INC ↗
  • Who funds LIMUDEI DA'AS INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAT YAGDIL TORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds TORAH LEARNING RESOURCES LTD ↗
  • Who funds MABAS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds BET YAAKOV OF THE JERSEY SHORE INC ↗
  • Who funds KEREN HASHVIIS INC ↗
  • Who funds TAG FLATBUSH INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA KETER TORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds Yeshivat Lev Torah ↗
  • Who funds YL HEARTS Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Adjmi Family Foundation IncNY73.9× affinity37 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Setton Foundation · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · The Adjmi-Dwek Foundation Inc · The Safdeye Brothers Foundation Inc · Mary & Abe Sutton Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · Ic Hessed Foundation · Cabasso Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization MPS Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from MPS Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Bet Yaakov of the Jersey Shore Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Yeshivat Yagdil Torah Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc: 8% of income from government
  • The Special Children Center: 5% of income from government
  • Heichal Hatorah: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to MPS Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to MPS Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 126 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on MPS’ filings →

More from the funding graph