Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Mozel Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$358k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$1.2MReligion$690kInternational$368kCrime & Legal$110kCivil Rights$99kHealth$50kHuman Services$38kArts & Culture$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $73k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $235k
$6,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YESHIVA UNIVERSITY$110,000
JEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY$75,000
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION$50,000
HEBREW UNION COLLEGE$25,000
HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL TOLERANCE CENTER$18,000
TULANE UNIVERSITY$10,000
TOURO LAW CENTER$10,000
PJ LIBRARY$10,000
MATAN$8,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$6,000
TULANE UNIVERSITY JEWISH STUDIES$6,000
PHYLIS JOHN MEISTRICHLENTER SCHOLAR$6,000
COLGATE UNIVERSITY$5,000
DARMOUITH JEWISH STUDIES PROGRAM$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MATAN: $10k → 17%MATAN: $10k → 17%MATAN: $8k → 17%MATAN: $5k → 17%MATAN: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.5M · 23 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
1

Total granted

$2.5M
$6k

Still filing today

26%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YU
    YESHIVA UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $755k · revenue +39%
  • TA
    THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND
    8× · 2017–2025 · $111k · revenue +72%
  • CU
    COLGATE UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • PM
    PJ MEISTRICH LENTER SCH FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $6k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

2
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
3
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
4
University of Judaism Foundation
5
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
6
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
7
Yeshiva University High Schools

The yeshiva university high schools has as its educational mission to teach and perpetuate the values of torah and secular studies. see schedule o.

Education
8
B'nai Brith Hillel Foundation At Princeton

Cjl partners with students and other members of the princeton community to sustain and grow a welcoming, multi-faceted and pluralistic jewish community that is fully-integrated into the fabric of campus life and which provides personally…

9
Greater Miami Hillel Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to enrich the lives of jewish undergraduate and graduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.

10
Hillel Foundation At the University of Rhode Island

The mission of uri hillel is to enrich the lives of jewish students at the university of rhode island so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.

11
Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life

Hillel's mission is to enrich the lives of jewish undergraduate and graduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.

Religion
12
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bnai Brith Hillel Foundation At Brooklyn College and the most unlike its peers is Jewish National Fund (Keren Kayemeth Leisrael) Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF AMERICA — $600,000 · OtherJEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF AMERICAHEBREW UNION COLLEGE-JEWISH INSTITUTE OF RELIGION — $175,000 · OtherHEBREW UNION COLLEGE-JEWISH INSTITUTE OF RELIGIONTOURO LAW CENTER — $110,000 · OtherTOURO LAW CENTERHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL TOLERANCE CENTER — $99,000 · OtherHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL TOLERANCE CENTERADVANCED CARE DIAGNOSTIC TREATMENT — $50,000 · Other+14 more — $216,605 · Other+14 moreYESHIVA UNIVERSITY — $755,000 · EducationYESHIVA UNIVERSITYTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND — $111,000 · EducationTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATI…COLGATE UNIVERSITY — $40,000 · Education+1 more — $30,000 · EducationBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $325,000 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT ISRAE…JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $43,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL …MATAN INC — $38,000 · Human Services
Other$1,250,605Education$936,000International$368,000Human Services$38,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYESHIVA UNIVERSITY — $755,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $325,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND — $111,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $43,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCOLGATE UNIVERSITY — $40,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMATAN INC — $38,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College — $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBNAI BRITH HILLEL FOUNDATION AT BROOKLYN COLLEGE — $14,400 over 8y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YESHIVA UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC
  • Who funds COLGATE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds MATAN INC
  • Who funds Trustees of Dartmouth College
  • Who funds BNAI BRITH HILLEL FOUNDATION AT BROOKLYN COLLEGE

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mozel Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph