Skip to content
Mountain Brook Council PTO Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Mountain Brook Council PTO Inc

To promote the welfare of children and youth in home, school, and community; to support the efforts of providing an effective, challenging, and engaging education for every one of our students; to bring into closer relation the home and the school,that parents and teachers may cooperate intelligently in the education of children and…

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$255k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$9.6M
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $28k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $538k
  • $250k+2 grants · $505k
$236,298
Median grant
1
States reached
$507k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CRESTLINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$255,205
MOUNTAIN BROOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$250,000
CHEROKEE BEND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$236,298
BROOKWOOD FOREST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$231,634
MOUNTAIN BROOK HIGH SCHOOL$70,139
MOUNTAIN BROOK JUNIOR HIGH$28,052
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%CRESTLINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $1.1M → 16%CHEROKEE BEND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $456k → 16%CRESTLINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $345k → 16%CRESTLINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $297k → 16%CRESTLINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $281k → 16%CRESTLINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $259k → 16%CRESTLINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $255k → 16%CHEROKEE BEND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $236k → 16%CHEROKEE BEND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $236k → 16%CHEROKEE BEND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $215k → 16%CRESTLINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $213k → 16%CHEROKEE BEND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $200k → 16%CHEROKEE BEND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $192k → 16%CHEROKEE BEND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $187k → 16%CRESTLINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $175k → 16%CHEROKEE BEND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $154k → 16%MOUNTAIN BROOK JUNIOR HIGH: $129k → 16%MOUNTAIN BROOK JUNIOR HIGH: $112k → 16%MOUNTAIN BROOK JUNIOR HIGH: $103k → 16%CHEROKEE BEND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $100k → 16%MOUNTAIN BROOK JUNIOR HIGH: $97k → 16%CRESTLINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $93k → 16%MOUNTAIN BROOK JUNIOR HIGH: $78k → 16%MOUNTAIN BROOK JUNIOR HIGH: $77k → 16%MOUNTAIN BROOK JUNIOR HIGH: $76k → 16%BROOKWOOD FOREST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $420k → 16%MOUNTAIN BROOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $250k → 16%BROOKWOOD FOREST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $232k → 16%MOUNTAIN BROOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $228k → 16%MOUNTAIN BROOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $215k → 16%MOUNTAIN BROOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $200k → 16%MOUNTAIN BROOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $188k → 16%BROOKWOOD FOREST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $184k → 16%MOUNTAIN BROOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $183k → 16%MOUNTAIN BROOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $180k → 16%BROOKWOOD FOREST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $179k → 16%BROOKWOOD FOREST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $170k → 16%MOUNTAIN BROOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $162k → 16%BROOKWOOD FOREST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $150k → 16%MOUNTAIN BROOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $145k → 16%BROOKWOOD FOREST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $143k → 16%BROOKWOOD FOREST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $117k → 16%MOUNTAIN BROOK HIGH SCHOOL: $75k → 16%MOUNTAIN BROOK HIGH SCHOOL: $70k → 16%MOUNTAIN BROOK HIGH SCHOOL: $59k → 16%MOUNTAIN BROOK HIGH SCHOOL: $51k → 16%MOUNTAIN BROOK HIGH SCHOOL: $49k → 16%MOUNTAIN BROOK HIGH SCHOOL: $48k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 1 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mountain Brook Council PTO’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home