Skip to content

· Public charity

Motor City Pride

To foster pride and respect for all lgbtq individuals in southeast michigan.

$28k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Civil Rights$26kHuman Services$3kReligion$3kArts & Culture$2kYouth Development$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $6,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $27,593 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $21,093 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$6,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$521k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
US Association of Prides$6,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 61% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Affirmations: $10k → 8%Interpride: $5k → 21%US Association of Prides: $7k → 14%LGBT Detroit: $3k → 21%United States Association of Prides: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
1/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AFFIRMATIONS COMMUNITY CENTER: $10,000 · Civil RightsAFFIRMATIONS COMMUNITY CENTERUS Association of Prides: $6,500 · Civil RightsUS Association of PridesLGBT Detroit: $3,000 · Civil RightsLGBT DetroitRuth Ellis Center: $2,500 · OtherRuth Ellis CenterIndividual grant recipient: $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAffirmations: $2,500 · OtherAffirmationsEquality Michigan: $2,500 · OtherEquality MichiganFair and Equal Michigan: $2,500 · OtherFair and Equal MichiganLGBT Detroit: $2,500 · OtherLGBT DetroitSing Out Detroit: $1,875 · OtherSing Out DetroitUnited States Association of Prides: $1,000 · OtherUnited States Association of PridesINTERPRIDE: $5,000 · EducationINTERPRIDE
Civil Rights$19,500Other$17,875Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAFFIRMATIONS COMMUNITY CENTER: $10,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetUS Association of Prides: $6,500 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetINTERPRIDE: $5,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetLGBT Detroit: $3,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AFFIRMATIONS COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds US Association of Prides ↗
  • Who funds INTERPRIDE ↗
  • Who funds LGBT Detroit ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Motor City Pride funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Motor City Pride. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Motor City Pride?

    Find your warmest path to Motor City Pride through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Motor City Pride’s filings →

    More from the funding graph