Skip to content
Moses Ginsberg Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Moses Ginsberg Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$223k
Granted FY2022
5
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2022.

Environment$625kEducation$75kInternational$25kHealth$14kRecreation & Sports$13kReligion$10kHuman Services$550
02FY2022 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k3 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE$200,000
AMERICAN AUSTRIAN FOUNDATION$14,500
CHURCH OF HEAVENLY REST$5,000
THE NEW SCHOOL$2,500
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%PATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 8%CAMP ZEKE: $5k → 13%MIDDLE EAST FORUM: $10k → 22%THE NEW SCHOOL: $5k → 17%RIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL: $3k → 28%WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE: $250k → 14%GREENWOODS COUNSELING & REFERRALS INC: $5k → 9%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $1k → 17%MIDDLE EAST FORUM: $10k → 22%THE NEW SCHOOL: $4k → 17%RIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL: $3k → 28%WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE: $200k → 14%GREENWOODS COUNSELING & REFERRALS INC: $5k → 9%THE NEW SCHOOL: $3k → 17%WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE: $175k → 14%GREENWOODS COUNSELING & REFERRALS INC: $2k → 9%THE NEW SCHOOL: $3k → 17%SUTTON PLACE PARKS CONSERVANCY: $8k → 17%JOSEPH RUGGIERO PANCREATIC RESEARCH FUND: $500 → 17%CHURCH OF HEAVENLY REST: $5k → 17%CHURCH OF HEAVENLY REST: $5k → 17%AMERICAN AUSTRIAN FOUNDATION: $15k → 17%AMERICAN AUSTRIAN FOUNDATION: $12k → 17%AMERICAN AUSTRIAN FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%AMERICAN AUSTRIAN FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%AMERICAN AUSTRIAN FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$742k · 7 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
5

Total granted

$742k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+119%

Still filing today

86%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22
InternationalHealthEducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE
    3× · 2018–2022 · $625k · revenue +52%
  • TN
    The New School
    4× · 2019–2022 · $14k · revenue +12%
  • GC
    GREENWOODS COUNSELING & REFERRALS INC
    3× · 2018–2021 · $12k · revenue +386%

Funded once

  • SP
    Sutton Place Parks Conservancygraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue +119%
  • PI
    PATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -27%
  • CZ
    CAMP ZEKE
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
Ie New York College

(see schedule o)

Education
4
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
5
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
7
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
8
Webster University

Founded in 1915, webster is a private non-profit and global university that is committed to delivering high-quality learning experiences that transform students for global citizenship and individual excellence.

Education
9
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Peter G Peterson Institute for International Economics

The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…

Social Science
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Resources Institute; the most unlike its peers is Sutton Place Parks Conservancy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE: $625,000 · InternationalWORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE+2 more: $25,000 · InternationalTHE AMERICAN AUSTRIAN FOUNDATION INC: $56,500 · OtherTHE AMERIC…CHURCH OF HEAVENLY REST: $10,000 · OtherCHURCH OF …CAMP ZEKE: $5,000 · OtherCAMP ZEKE+2 more: $1,050 · OtherThe New School: $13,500 · EducationRIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC: $5,000 · EducationGREENWOODS COUNSELING & REFERRALS INC: $12,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 · HealthSutton Place Parks Conservancy: $7,500 · Recreation & Sports
International$650,000Other$72,550Education$18,500Health$13,000Recreation & Sports$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE: $625,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE AMERICAN AUSTRIAN FOUNDATION INC: $56,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetMIDDLE EAST FORUM: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetThe New School: $13,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWOODS COUNSELING & REFERRALS INC: $12,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetSutton Place Parks Conservancy: $7,500 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetRIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments …
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Moses Ginsberg Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Moses Ginsberg Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Greenwoods Counseling & Referrals Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Moses Ginsberg Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Moses Ginsberg Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Moses Ginsberg Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home