Skip to content

· Public charity

Morselife Foundation Inc

To solicit, receive and invest the proceeds of grants, contributions, pledges, and other support from governmental entities and the public at large, and to support all related tax-exempt organizations for the purpose of enhancing senior living in the spirit of jewish tradition.

$4.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$22MHealth$12MHousing & Shelter$5.7MArts & Culture$1.8MOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $540
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $21k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+6 grants · $3.9M
$545,596
Median grant
1
States reached
$39M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOLA & SAUL KRMAER SENIOR SERVICES AGENCY INC$1,112,220
JOSEPH L MORSE HEALTH CENTER INC$712,836
MORSELIFE HOSPICE INSTITUTE INC$678,805
MORSELIFE HOUSING CORPORATION INC$621,563
NEXT GENERATIONS OF HOLOCAUST SURVIVORS$545,596
MORSELIFE HOME CARE INC$259,908
FRIENDS OF MORSELIFE INC$50,000
Individual grant recipient$20,552
MORSELIFE HEALTH SYSTEMS INC$540
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $22.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE CHILDREN'S PLACE AT HOME SAFE INC: $11k → 11%THE CHILDREN'S PLACE AT HOME SAFE: $10k → 11%THE TRADITIONS OF THE PALM BEACHES INC: $3.4M → 11%LOLA & SAUL KRAMER SENIOR SERVICES AGENCY INC: $3.0M → 11%LOLA & SAUL KRAMER SENIOR SERVICES AGENCY INC: $2.3M → 11%MORSELIFE HOUSING CORPORATION INC: $2.2M → 11%THE TRADITIONS OF THE PALM BEACHES INC: $1.7M → 11%LOLA & SAUL KRAMER SENIOR SERVICES AGENCY INC: $1.5M → 11%MORSELIFE HOUSING CORPORATION INC: $1.3M → 11%LOLA & SAUL KRAMER SENIOR SERVICES AGENCY INC: $1.3M → 11%LOLA & SAUL KRMAER SENIOR SERVICES AGENCY INC: $1.1M → 11%MORSELIFE HOUSING CORPORATION INC: $863k → 11%LOLA & SAUL KRAMER SENIOR SERVICES AGENCY INC: $846k → 11%MORSELIFE HOUSING CORPORATION INC: $622k → 11%LOLA & SAUL KRAMER SENIOR SERVICES AGENCY INC: $580k → 11%LOLA & SAUL KRAMER SENIOR SERVICES AGENCY INC: $561k → 11%LOLA & SAUL KRAMER SENIOR SERVICES AGENCY INC: $452k → 11%MORSELIFE HOUSING CORPORATION INC: $240k → 11%MORSELIFE HOUSING CORPORATION INC: $219k → 11%MORSELIFE HOUSING CORPORATION INC: $189k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 70% of Morselife Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in FL; by stated purpose, 30%.

Morselife Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$41M · 9 repeat orgs$81k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
1

Total granted

$41M
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+144%
+262%

Still filing today

89%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureSocial ScienceOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LS
    LOLA & SAUL KRAMER SENIOR SERVICES AGENCY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $12M · revenue +73% · 76% of their budget
  • TM
    THE MORSELIFE HOUSING CORPORATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $11M · revenue +144%
  • MH
    MORSELIFE HOME CARE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $4.6M · revenue +307%

Funded once

  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DRUG DISCOVERY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +262%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Morselife Foundation Inc

To solicit, receive and invest the proceeds of grants, contributions, pledges, and other support from governmental entities and the public at large, and to support all related tax-exempt organizations for the purpose of enhancing senior…

Human Services
2
Mount Carmel Health Plan Inc

We, mount carmel and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.mount carmel health plan is a member of mount carmel and trinity health.

Health
3
Miami Jewish Health Systems Inc

Miami jewish health systems, inc. was incorporated to provide shelter for the elderly and develop social & health programs relating to their care. in addition, research & educational programs are conducted for the elderly to enhance their…

Human Services
4
Lourdes-Noreen Mckeen Residence for Geriatric Care Inc

The mission of lourdes-noreen mckeen residence is to provide quality health care and residential services in a compassionate, caring and homelike atmosphere, respecting the mission, vision, and values of the carmelite sisters for the aged…

Human Services
5
Madlyn and Leonard Abramson Center for Jewish Life and Subsidiaries

The mission of the madlyn & leonard abramson center for jewish life (dba "abramson senior care") is to enhance the quality of life for seniors and their family caregivers by ensuring that seniors receive exceptional health care services…

Health
6
Menorah Home and Hospital for Aged and Infirm

Operating as menorah center for rehabilitation and nursing care, menorah is a 436-bed not-for-profit organization that is a member of mjhs health system. menorah is committed to providing exceptional sub-acute rehabilitation services and…

Health
7
Phelps Memorial Hospital Association

Phelps memorial hospital association ("pmha") is part of northwell health, inc ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the…

Health
8
Jgs Administrative Services Inc

To provide administrative support to jgs lifecare corporation.

Health
9
Hospice of the Florida Keys Inc

To enable individuals to remain in their homes by supporting compassionate, effective, life-enhancing health and supportive services. at this time, hfk care corporation is inactive.

Human Services
10
Hospice Care Network

Our mission is to enable persons to live with peace and dignity in a caring environment during the final stages of life by offering care and comfort to both them and to those whom they share their lives.

Human Services
11
Hebrew Seniorlife Hospice Care Inc

The mission of hsl hospice is to provide exceptional care to terminally ill patients and their families allowing patients to attain the highest quality of life possible. hsl hospice aims to provide the highest quality hospice service that…

Human Services
12
Metropolitan Jewish Home Care Inc

Mjhs home care is a not-for-profit, certified home health agency (chha), committed to providing skilled nursing and rehabilitation services for individuals recuperating at home from an acute episode, often elderly and at-risk members of…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Morselife Health System Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Children's Place at Home Safe Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LOLA & SAUL KRAMER SENIOR SERVICES AGENCY INC: $11,680,692 · Human ServicesLOLA & SAUL KRAMER SENIOR SERVICES AGENCY INCTHE MORSELIFE HOUSING CORPORATION INC: $10,806,332 · Human ServicesTHE MORSELIFE HOUSING CORPORATION INC+1 more: $21,000 · Human ServicesJOSEPH L MORSE HEALTH CENTER INC: $10,144,039 · HealthJOSEPH L MORSE HEALTH CENTER INCMORSELIFE HOME CARE INC: $4,615,852 · HealthMORSELIFE HOME CARE INCMORSELIFE HOSPICE INSTITUTE INC: $1,612,976 · HealthMORSELIFE HOSPICE INSTITUTE INC+1 more: $447,500 · HealthNext Generations of Holocaust Survivors Inc: $1,764,512 · Arts & CulturePALM BEACH SENIOR CARE HEALTH MANAGEMENT LLC: $106,354 · OtherMORSELIFE HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $50,540 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,552 · OtherALZHEIMER'S DRUG DISCOVERY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Social Science
Human Services$22,508,024Health$16,820,367Arts & Culture$1,764,512Other$177,446Social Science$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLOLA & SAUL KRAMER SENIOR SERVICES AGENCY INC: $11,680,692 over 9y, 76% of budgetTHE MORSELIFE HOUSING CORPORATION INC: $10,806,332 over 9y, 25% of budgetJOSEPH L MORSE HEALTH CENTER INC: $10,144,039 over 9y, 4.9% of budgetMORSELIFE HOME CARE INC: $4,615,852 over 9y, 5.1% of budgetNext Generations of Holocaust Survivors Inc: $1,764,512 over 4y, 100% of budgetMORSELIFE HOSPICE INSTITUTE INC: $1,612,976 over 5y, 12% of budgetFRIENDS OF MORSELIFE INC: $447,500 over 2y, 58% of budgetMORSELIFE HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $50,540 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Children's Place at Home Safe Inc: $21,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DRUG DISCOVERY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LOLA & SAUL KRAMER SENIOR SERVICES AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MORSELIFE HOUSING CORPORATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JOSEPH L MORSE HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MORSELIFE HOME CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds Next Generations of Holocaust Survivors Inc ↗
  • Who funds MORSELIFE HOSPICE INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MORSELIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds MORSELIFE HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds The Children's Place at Home Safe Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DRUG DISCOVERY FOUNDATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Morselife Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Morselife Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 21%
  • Lola & Saul Kramer Senior Services Agency Inc: 21% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Morselife’s filings →

More from the funding graph