Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Morris & Jeannette Kessel Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$83k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Environment$92kInternational$44kAnimals$28kHealth$24kArts & Culture$20kPhilanthropy$19kRecreation & Sports$16kEducation$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $48k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$403k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$14,000
RAINFOREST TRUST$12,000
SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION$12,000
OCEANA$10,000
UNITED JEWISH APPEAL$8,000
CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC$5,000
ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND$5,000
CARNEGIE HALL$4,000
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FOUNDATION$3,000
RIPPOWAN CISQUA SCHOOL$3,000
INTERNATIONAL CENTER OF PHOTOGRAPHY$3,000
NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE$2,000
KENT LAND TRUST$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE: $6k → 8%ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND: $5k → 9%SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $14k → 10%NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE: $2k → 6%RIPPOWAN CISQUA SCHOOL: $3k → 9%UNITED JEWISH APPEAL: $8k → 17%THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AT MONTEFIORE: $6k → 28%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS: $11k → 14%OCEANA: $10k → 14%KENT LAND TRUST: $3k → 9%ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND: $5k → 9%SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $12k → 10%NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE: $2k → 6%RIPPOWAN CISQUA SCHOOL: $2k → 9%UNITED JEWISH APPEAL: $8k → 17%OCEANA: $10k → 14%KENT LAND TRUST: $2k → 9%ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND: $3k → 9%SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $12k → 10%CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $6k → 17%KENT LAND TRUST: $2k → 9%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $16k → 17%CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $5k → 17%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $14k → 17%CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $5k → 17%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $14k → 17%UNITED JEWISH APPEAL FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $3k → 17%SEE LIST: $60k → 17%CARNEGIE HALL: $4k → 17%CARNEGIE HALL: $4k → 17%CARNEGIE HALL: $3k → 17%INTERNATIONAL CENTER OF PHOTOGRAPHY: $3k → 17%INTERNATIONAL CENTER OF PHOTOGRAPHY: $3k → 17%INTERNATIONAL CENTER OF PHOTOGRAPHY: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
CT
CA
VA
MD
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$221k · 14 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
4

Total granted

$221k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+0%
+39%

Still filing today

86%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
AnimalsEnvironmentInternationalArts & CultureHealthRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $44k · revenue +20%
  • CP
    CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $16k · revenue +0%
  • AL
    ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $13k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $11k · revenue -24%
  • MM
    MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +39%
  • INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +49%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

4
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
5
International Life Sciences Institute

Ilsi is a global, nonprofit federation dedicated to generating and advancing emerging science and groundbreaking research to ensure foods are safe, nutritious and sustainable, and that they improve planetary and human health and well-being…

Science & Tech
6
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
7
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
8
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
9
Center for International Environmental Law Inc

To investigate, research, write, publish, present conferences and teach with respect to global, regional, transboundary, and comparative environmental issues and to make the findings from such activities available to the general public; to…

International
10
New York League of Conservation Voters

See schedule onylcv is a non-partisan policy making and political action organization that works to make environmental protection a top priority with elected officials, decision-makers and the voters by evaluating incumbent performance and…

11
Wildlife Conservation Society

The wildlife conservation society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.

Animals
12
National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors

Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central Park Conservancy Inc and the most unlike its peers is National Wildlife Federation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $43,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCRAINFOREST TRUST — $27,000 · InternationalRAINFOREST TRUSTSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $37,500 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATIONOCEANA INC — $20,000 · EnvironmentOCEANA INCKENT LAND TRUST INC — $7,000 · EnvironmentKENT LAND TRUST INCANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC — $13,000 · AnimalsANIMAL LEGAL…INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC — $6,000 · AnimalsINTERNATIONA…NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION — $5,000 · AnimalsNATIONAL WIL…NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC — $4,000 · AnimalsNORTH SHORE …UNITED JEWISH APPEAL — $16,000 · OtherUNITED JEWISH …MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING — $7,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN…The Rippowam Cisqua School Inc — $5,000 · OtherThe Rippowam C…UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $3,000 · OtherUNITED JEWISH …THE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION — $11,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CARNE…INTERNATIONAL CENTER OF PHOTOGRAPHY — $9,000 · Arts & CultureINTERNATI…PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC — $11,000 · HealthMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER — $6,000 · HealthCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $16,000 · Recreation & Sports
International$70,500Environment$64,500Animals$28,000Other$31,000Arts & Culture$20,000Health$17,000Recreation & Sports$16,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $43,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $37,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRAINFOREST TRUST — $27,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOCEANA INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $16,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC — $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION — $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC — $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CENTER OF PHOTOGRAPHY — $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKENT LAND TRUST INC — $7,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Rippowam Cisqua School Inc — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Morris & Jeannette Kessel Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Morris & Jeannette Kessel Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Morris & Jeannette Kessel Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph