Skip to content
Morris Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Morris Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$390k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$165k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.1MYouth Development$145kCommunity Improvement$22k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $22k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $343k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROGUE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$165,238
EAGLE POINT SCHOOL DISTRICT #9$128,000
SCHOOL DISTRICT 6 FBO CRATER HIGH SCHOOL$50,000
BUTTE FALLS COMMUNITY BFCSP$22,000
ROGUE RIVER SCHOOL DISTRICT #35$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
PROSPECT CHARTER SCHOOL FFA$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
PHOENIX TALENT SCHOOL DISTRICT$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 42% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 13%YOUTH 7 FIVE MINISTRIES: $87k → 13%CHEMEKETA COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $6k → 14%KLAMATH COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $5k → 16%ROGUE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $198k → 18%PHOENIX TALENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $65k → 13%ROGUE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $165k → 18%YOUTH 7 FIVE MINISTRIES: $58k → 13%ROGUE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $150k → 18%CENTRAL POINT SCHOOL DISTRICT #6: $200k → 13%ROGUE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $148k → 18%CENTRAL POINT SCHOOL DISTRICT #6: $60k → 13%ROGUE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $90k → 18%SCHOOL DISTRICT 6 FBO CRATER HIGH SCHOOL: $50k → 13%ROGUE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $88k → 18%CENTRAL POINT SCHOOL DISTRICT #6: $6k → 13%ROGUE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $75k → 18%CRATER FFA CHAPTER: $5k → 13%ROGUE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $43k → 18%CRATER FFA CHAPTER: $5k → 13%CENTRAL POINT SCHOOL DISTRICT #6: $5k → 13%CRATER FFA CHAPTER: $5k → 13%CRATER FFA CHAPTER: $5k → 13%PHOENIX TALENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $5k → 13%PHOENIX TALENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $5k → 13%PHOENIX TALENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $5k → 13%PHOENIX TALENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $5k → 13%EAGLE POINT SCHOOL DISTRICT #9: $220k → 13%EAGLE POINT SCHOOL DISTRICT #9: $128k → 13%ED FINANCIAL SERVICES: $13k → 13%EAGLE POINT SCHOOL DISTRICT #9: $50k → 13%ROGUE RIVER SCHOOL DISTRICT #35: $9k → 13%EAGLE POINT SCHOOL DISTRICT #9: $15k → 13%ROGUE RIVER SCHOOL DISTRICT #35: $5k → 13%EAGLE POINT FFA: $5k → 13%ROGUE RIVER SCHOOL DISTRICT #35: $5k → 13%EAGLE POINT FFA: $5k → 13%ROGUE RIVER SCHOOL DISTRICT #35: $5k → 13%EAGLE POINT SCHOOL DISTRICT #9: $5k → 13%ROGUE RIVER SCHOOL DISTRICT #35: $5k → 13%EAGLE POINT FFA: $5k → 13%ED FINANCIAL SERVICES: $5k → 13%EAGLE POINT FFA: $5k → 13%ROGUE RIVER SCHOOL DISTRICT #35: $5k → 13%PROSPECT CHARTER SCHOOL: $165k → 13%PROSPECT CHARTER SCHOOL FFA: $10k → 13%BUTTE FALLS CHARTER SCHOOL: $50k → 13%BUTTE FALLS CHARTER SCHOOL: $28k → 13%BUTTE FALLS COMMUNITY BFCSP: $22k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 12 repeat orgs$242k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
2

Total granted

$2.1M
$170k

Still filing today

17%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $72k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’21’22’23’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    ROGUE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2025 · $957k · revenue +311%
  • EP
    EAGLE POINT SCHOOL DISTRICT #9
    5× · 2021–2025 · $418k
  • CP
    CENTRAL POINT SCHOOL DISTRICT #6
    4× · 2017–2022 · $271k

Funded once

  • PC
    PROSPECT CHARTER SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $165k
  • KC
    KLAMATH COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/2
Grantees still filing
2/2
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EAGLE POINT SCHOOL DISTRICT #9: $418,470 · OtherEAGLE POINT SCHOOL DISTRICT #9CENTRAL POINT SCHOOL DISTRICT #6: $270,500 · OtherCENTRAL POINT SCHOOL DISTRICT #6PROSPECT CHARTER SCHOOL: $165,000 · OtherPROSPECT CHARTER SCHOOLPHOENIX TALENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $85,000 · OtherPHOENIX TALENT SCHOOL DISTRICTBUTTE FALLS CHARTER SCHOOL: $77,807 · OtherBUTTE FALLS CHARTER SCHOOLSCHOOL DISTRICT 6 FBO CRATER HIGH SCHOOL: $50,000 · Other+8 more: $148,424 · Other+8 moreROGUE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $956,739 · EducationROGUE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIONYOUTH 71FIVE MINISTRIES: $145,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,215,201Education$956,739Youth Development$145,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROGUE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $956,739 over 7y, 12% of budgetYOUTH 71FIVE MINISTRIES: $145,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ROGUE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH 71FIVE MINISTRIES ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Morris Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Morris Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 24%
  • Youth 71FIVE Ministries: 24% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Morris Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Morris Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Morris Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home