Skip to content
Morris and Marcy Tbeile Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Morris and Marcy Tbeile Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$142k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$39k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$831kPhilanthropy$34kHuman Services$20kInternational$9kYouth Development$7kEducation$4kHealth$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $104k
$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$233k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISHKAN TORAH$38,719
SYNAGOGUE OF OAKHURST COMMUNITY CENTER INC$26,680
LEV AHARON$21,100
YESHIVAH OF FLATBUSH$17,200
ILEAD EXPERIENCE$6,850
KOL HANEARIM$5,550
MISCELLANEOUS DONATIONS UNDER 1000$4,991
Individual grant recipient$2,600
HILLEL YESHIVA$2,300
SHAAREI MORDECHAI$2,000
COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE FUND$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,800
MATTAN BASSETER$1,800
DSN$1,285
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $1k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $1k → 20%COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE FUND: $2k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$889k · 24 repeat orgs$79k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
28

Total granted

$889k
$62k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+32%

Still filing today

29%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyReligionYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesInternationalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KH
    KOL HANEARIM INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $9k · revenue +48%
  • AF
    American Friends of Kol Yehuda Inc
    2× · 2018–2019 · $6k · revenue +6%
  • MB
    MATTAN BASSETER INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $4k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • MD
    MAGEN DAVID YESHIVAH
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • CC
    COLEL CHABAD
    one grant, 2019 · $9k
  • RF
    REACH FOR THE STARS FUND INC EIN 84-2109090
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
2
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
3
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
4
Yad Yosef Foundation
Philanthropy
5
American Friends of Hamesorah Talmud Torah Inc

Charity and education in u.s. and israel

—
6
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
7
American Friends of Amaleh Shel Torah Inc

None

Education
8
Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation
Philanthropy
9
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
10
Sherit Isroel
—
11
Bais Yehuda Perach Rochel Foundation
Public Benefit
12
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Yeshivat Nachalat Yossef; the most unlike its peers is Ezra Abraham to Life Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YESHIVAH OF FLATBUSH: $331,922 · OtherYESHIVAH OF FLATBUSHYESHIVAH OF FLATBUSH EIN 11-1630915: $207,400 · OtherYESHIVAH OF FLATBUSH EIN 11-1630915MISHKAN TORAH: $79,317 · OtherMISHKAN TORAHSYNAGOGUE OF OAKHURST COMMUNITY CENTER INC EIN 22-3437922: $37,563 · OtherSYNAGOGUE OF OAKHURST COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $36,578 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEV AHARON: $31,700 · Other+40 more: $185,562 · Other+40 moreSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $13,765 · Youth DevelopmentILEAD EXPERIENCE INC: $6,850 · Youth DevelopmentAmerican Friends of Kol Yehuda Inc: $5,602 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT NACHALAT YOSSEF: $2,600 · ReligionSHAARE MORDECHAI INC: $2,000 · ReligionYAD MISHKAN INC: $1,200 · ReligionKOL HANEARIM INC: $9,155 · InternationalDARCHEI NOAM INC: $3,914 · PhilanthropyALBERT MISSRY FOUNDATION: $1,801 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF AHAVATH SHALOM INC: $1,800 · PhilanthropyEzra Abraham To Life Foundation: $660 · PhilanthropyMATTAN BASSETER INC: $4,400 · EducationSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $2,284 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ASSISTANCE FUND INC: $2,000 · Human Services
Other$910,042Youth Development$20,615Religion$11,402International$9,155Philanthropy$8,175Education$4,400Human Services$4,284

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEV AHARON: $31,700 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $13,765 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKOL HANEARIM INC: $9,155 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetILEAD EXPERIENCE INC: $6,850 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetMATTAN BASSETER INC: $4,400 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT NACHALAT YOSSEF: $2,600 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $2,284 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHAARE MORDECHAI INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY ASSISTANCE FUND INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetALBERT MISSRY FOUNDATION: $1,801 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF AHAVATH SHALOM INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYAD MISHKAN INC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEzra Abraham To Life Foundation: $660 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSEPHARDIC HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC: $544 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEV AHARON ↗
  • Who funds SEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds KOL HANEARIM INC ↗
  • Who funds ILEAD EXPERIENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Kol Yehuda Inc ↗
  • Who funds MATTAN BASSETER INC ↗
  • Who funds DARCHEI NOAM INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT NACHALAT YOSSEF ↗
  • Who funds SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds SHAARE MORDECHAI INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ALBERT MISSRY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundJack Adjmi Family Fou…The Ralph S Gindi Fam…Isaac & Marjorie Gind…Chehebar Family Found…The Foop FoundationRalph J Harary Founda…The Howard Hoffman & …The Amin and Lillian …The Setton FoundationThe Mamiye Foundation…Ic Hessed Foundation
Jewish Communal FundNY30.7× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation · Isaac & Marjorie Gindi Foundation Inc · Chehebar Family Foundation · The Foop Foundation · Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · The Setton Foundation · The Mamiye Foundation Inc · Ic Hessed Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Morris and Marcy Tbeile Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Morris and Marcy Tbeile Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Morris and Marcy Tbeile Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home