Skip to content

· Private foundation

Moran Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$912k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$750k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$1.1MHousing & Shelter$750kEducation$491kHuman Services$125kArts & Culture$30kPhilanthropy$17kYouth Development$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $117k
  • $250k+1 grant · $750k
$30,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOME (SO OTHER MIGHT EAT)$750,000
CONSORTIUM OF CATHOLIC ACADEMIES (CCA)$117,047
ALEXANDRIA TUTORING CONSORTIUM$30,000
PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE$10,000
LIFT DC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%L'ARCHE GREATER WASHINGTON DC: $60k → 14%L'ARCHE GREATER WASHINGTON DC: $40k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

23%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$854k · 4 repeat orgs$2.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against -24% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
7

Total granted

$854k
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
-24%

Still filing today

50%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $902k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEmploymentYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WS
    WASHINGTON SCHOOL FOR GIRLS
    2× · 2023–2024 · $487k · revenue -36%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2023–2024 · $240k
  • LI
    LARCHE Inc
    2× · 2020–2021 · $100k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $1.1M · revenue -30%
  • SI
    SOME INC
    one grant, 2023 · $750k · revenue -24%
  • LT
    LIFE TO PIECES MASTERPIECES
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Capitol Hill Day School

Capitol Hill Day School is a co-educational independent school serving students from pre-kindergarten through 8th grade. Capitol Hill Day School deeply engages a diverse community of students in connecting the classroom with the larger…

Education
2
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

—
3
Act for Alexandria

Amplify the work of our community by bringing people and resources together.

Community Improvement
4
Children's Hospital

Organization's mission to improve health outcomes for children; be a leader in creating innovative solutions to pediatric healthcare problems; and excel in care, advocacy, research. as the nation's children's hospital, the mission of…

Health
5
Council for Court Excellence

Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.

—
6
Girls on the Run Puget Sound

We inspire girls to be joyful, healthy, and confident using a fun, experience-based curriculum which creatively integrates running.

Recreation & Sports
7
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
8
Thrive Dc

Thrive dc works to prevent and end homelessness by providing vulnerable individuals with a comprehensive range of services to help stabilize their lives.

Food & Nutrition
9
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
10
The Seed Public Charter School of Washington Dc

The seed public charter school of washington, dc is a public college-preparatory boarding school whose primary mission is to provide an outstanding intensive educational program that prepares children, both academically and socially, for…

Education
11
Girls on the Run Georgia Inc

Girls on the Run Georgia empowers girls with vital social-emotional skills to help them succeed in school, at home, and within friendships. Our programs, Girls on the Run (3rd-5th grade) and Heart & Sole (6th-8th grade) are taught by…

Youth Development
12
The Arc of the District of Columbia Inc

To improve the quality of life for all persons with intellectual disabilities and their families through supports and advocacy.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hospital Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Alexandria Tutoring Consortium Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOME INC: $750,000 · OtherSOME INCSOME (SO OTHER MIGHT EAT): $750,000 · OtherSOME (SO OTHER MIGHT EAT)Individual grant recipient: $240,413 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCONSORTIUM OF CATHOLIC ACADEMIES (CCA): $117,047 · OtherCONSORTIUM OF CATHOLIC ACADEMIES (CCA)+4 more: $59,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1,150,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONWASHINGTON SCHOOL FOR GIRLS: $486,839 · EducationWASHINGTON SCHO…ALEXANDRIA TUTORING CONSORTIUM INC: $30,000 · EducationALEXANDRIA TUTO…LARCHE Inc: $100,000 · Human ServicesTHE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE: $26,500 · PhilanthropyLIFT INC: $5,000 · EmploymentGirls on the Run of NOVA: $3,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,916,460Health$1,150,000Education$516,839Human Services$100,000Philanthropy$26,500Employment$5,000Youth Development$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1,150,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSOME INC: $750,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetLARCHE Inc: $100,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetALEXANDRIA TUTORING CONSORTIUM INC: $30,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetTHE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE: $26,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLIFT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGirls on the Run of NOVA: $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOME INC ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON SCHOOL FOR GIRLS ↗
  • Who funds LARCHE Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALEXANDRIA TUTORING CONSORTIUM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE ↗
  • Who funds LIFT INC ↗
  • Who funds Girls on the Run of NOVA ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Moran Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Moran Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Moran Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph