Skip to content

· Private foundation

Moon Jack Scholarship Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$220k
Granted FY2025still arriving
38
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$2.6MArts & Culture$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,789
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE$5,789
LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE$5,789
LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE$5,789
ST CLOUD TECHNICAL & COMMUNITY COLLEGE$5,789
LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE$5,789
LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE$5,789
NORTHWOOD TECHNICAL COLLEGE$5,789
LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE$5,789
LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE$5,789
LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE$5,789
LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE$5,789
LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE$5,789
FOND DU LAC TRIBAL AND COMMUNITY COLLEGE$5,789
LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE$5,789
FOND DU LAC TRIBAL AND COMMUNITY COLLEGE$5,789
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FOND DU LAC TRIBAL AND COMM COLLEGE FBO: $6k → 10%ST CLOUD TECHNICAL & COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $6k → 11%MINNESOTA NORTH COLLEGE: $31k → 15%CHIPPEWA VALLEY TECH COLLEGE FBO: $6k → 12%NORTHWOOD TECH COLLEGE FBO DANAE BRYANT: $6k → 13%FOND DU LAC TRIBAL AND COM COL FBO: $6k → 10%MINNESOTA NORTH COLLEGE: $30k → 15%NORTHWOOD TECH COLLEGE FBO: $6k → 13%FOND DU LAC TRIBAL AND COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $6k → 10%LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $63k → 15%NORTHWOOD TECH COLLEGE FBO BREKKEN MAAS: $6k → 13%FOND DU LAC TRIBAL AND COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $6k → 10%LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $60k → 15%NORTHWOOD TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $6k → 13%FOND DU LAC TRIBAL AND COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $6k → 10%LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE FBO: $6k → 15%NORTHWOOD TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $6k → 13%FOND DU LAC TRIBAL AND COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $6k → 10%LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE FBO ALEXI TONDRYK: $6k → 15%FOND DU LAC TRIBAL AND COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $6k → 10%LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE FBO: $6k → 15%LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE FBO LUKAS MAYNE: $6k → 15%LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE FBO JOE MCGEE: $6k → 15%LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE FBO ANNA FOLDESI: $6k → 15%LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE FBO AVA ANDERSON: $6k → 15%LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE FBO LIAM HENNES: $6k → 15%LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE FBO: $6k → 15%LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE FBO MICHAEL GILL: $6k → 15%LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE FBO CONNOR BELL: $6k → 15%LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE FBO ALLAN HAIGH: $6k → 15%LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE FBO: $6k → 15%LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE FBO SONJA LONG: $6k → 15%LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE: $6k → 15%LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE: $6k → 15%LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE: $6k → 15%LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE: $6k → 15%LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE: $6k → 15%LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE: $6k → 15%LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE: $6k → 15%LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE: $6k → 15%LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE: $6k → 15%LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE: $6k → 15%LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE: $6k → 15%LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE: $6k → 15%LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE: $6k → 15%LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE: $6k → 15%LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE: $6k → 15%LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE: $6k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 26 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
91

Total granted

$1.3M
$1.1M

Still filing today

4%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LS
    Lake Superior College
    3× · 2019–2025 · $673k
  • LS
    LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $123k · revenue +67%
  • FD
    Fond du Lac Tribal and Community College
    3× · 2019–2025 · $83k

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR SCHOLARSHIP
    one grant, 2018 · $465k
  • WI
    Wisconsin Indianhead Technical College
    one grant, 2019 · $46k
  • LS
    LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE FBO
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northcentral Technical College Foundation Inc

The ntc foundation develops relationships that enable individuals, businesses and the community to advocate for and provide resources in support of northcentral technical college in accomplishing its mission.

—
2
Minnesota State College Southeast Foundation

To assist the college in achieving excellence in technical education for employment by developing financial and community resources for students, employers and communities within our service area.

Education
3
North Central State College Foundation

The mission of the North Central State Foundation is to assist the College in providing life long learning opportunities by securing financial and community support.

—
4
Mid-State Technical College Foundation Inc

To provide student scholarships and grants, and to support education programs of the college.

Education
5
St Charles Community College Foundation Inc

To improve the quality of life in our community and enhance awareness of the college and foundation

—
6
Minneapolis Community &

The minneapolis community & technical college foundation helps solve issues of affordability and access to higher education through scholarships and initiatives that support students, enhance the readiness of our workforce and support the…

Education
7
North Hennepin Community College Foundation

The mission of the North Hennepin Community College Foundation is to create access to quality educational opportunities by energizing and mobilizing community, college, and alumni resources on behalf of North Hennepin Community College.

—
8
Fort Scott Community College Foundation

To facilitate and encourage gifts to fort scott community college to support the college's mission to provide a higher education to students.

—
9
SC4 Foundation

To support scholarships, and capital and special projects for st. clair community college.

Education
10
Snead State Community College Foundation
International
11
Columbia State Community College

Encourages improvement of education at our college and making higher education accessible.

—
12
Metropolitan Community College Foundation

MCCF supports MCC's mission through community awareness and providing giving opportunities that support faculty and programs, while offering student scholarships and emergency aid to promote successful completion of their education.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pine Technical & Community College Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Center for Scholarship Administration. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 117 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/1
Grantees still filing
1/1
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Lake Superior College: $673,424 · OtherLake Superior CollegeTHE CENTER FOR SCHOLARSHIP: $464,637 · OtherTHE CENTER FOR SCHOLARSHIPLAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $122,985 · OtherFond du Lac Tribal and Community College: $82,638 · Other+113 more: $974,128 · Other+113 more
Other$2,317,812

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $122,985 over 2y, 15% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Moon Jack Scholarship Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Moon Jack Scholarship Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 117 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Moon Jack Scholarship’s filings →

    More from the funding graph