Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mookerji Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$514k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.3MReligion$348kScience & Tech$335kInternational$240kPhilanthropy$163kCommunity Improvement$35kHealth$10kArts & Culture$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $251k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$87,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$9.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BIRLA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY & SCIENCE$250,000
Individual grant recipient$164,000
SEWA INTERNATIONAL$87,000
SPRUILL CENTER FOR THE ARTS$10,000
TIE ATLANTA FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 65% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BIRLA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY & SCIENCE: $250k → 8%SMITHSONIAN ASTROPHYSICAL SOCIETY: $25k → 14%ELON FOUNDATION: $30k → 13%KSU FOUNDATION: $120k → 8%ACCESS GEORGIA FOUNDATION: $25k → 13%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%SOCIETY OF SISTERS: $35k → 6%SHAKTHIDHAMA: $44k → 13%ELON FOUNDATION: $25k → 13%KSU FOUNDATION: $120k → 8%SHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%TIE ATLANTA FOUNDATION: $35k → 14%SOCIETY OF SISTERS: $35k → 6%SHAKTHIHAMA: $40k → 13%ELON FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%KSU FOUNDATION: $120k → 8%ATLANTA HUMANE SOCIETY: $1k → 13%TIE ATLANTA FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%SHAKTHIDHAMA: $26k → 13%KSU FOUNDATION: $26k → 8%GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION: $210k → 13%TIE ATLANTA FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%SHAKTHIHAMA: $25k → 13%KSU FOUNDATION: $20k → 8%GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION: $200k → 13%TIE ATLANTA FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%SHAKTHIHAMA: $17k → 13%COBB CAMBER OF COMMERCE: $5k → 8%GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION: $200k → 13%SPRUILL CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $10k → 14%SHAKTHIDHAMA: $15k → 13%GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION: $100k → 13%TIE ATLANTA FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION: $100k → 13%TIE ATLANTA FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION: $100k → 13%ATLANTA CEO COUNCIL: $5k → 14%GOIZUETA FOUNDATION: $25k → 13%TIE ATLANTA FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%TIE ATLANTA FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 11 repeat orgs$363k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +104% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
9

Total granted

$2.6M
$103k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+104%
+15%

Still filing today

45%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $260k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyEducationPublic BenefitCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $910k · revenue +116%
  • KS
    KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $406k · revenue +104%
  • HC
    HIMALAYAN CHILDREN'S CHARITIES
    5× · 2017–2021 · $28k · revenue +162%

Funded once

  • AG
    ACCESS GEORGIA FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · 89% of their budget
  • TG
    THE GOIZUETA FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -20%
  • SA
    SMITHSONIAN ASTROPHYSICAL SOCIETY
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Georgia Advanced Technology Ventures Inc

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively as a supporting organization to and for the benefit of the georgia institute of technology to foster and support education and scientific research and economic development…

Education
2
Endeavor Atlanta Inc

Driven by our belief that High-Impact Entrepreneurs transform economies, Endeavor is on a mission to build thriving entrepreneurial ecosystems in emerging and underserved markets around the world.

Community Improvement
3
Georgia Tech Research Corporation

The georgia tech research corporation (gtrc) is organized and operated to support the research activities of the georgia institute of technology in the areas of innovative research, technical assistance, and economic development.

Health
4
Georgia Tech Global Inc

To engage in charitable, scientific, literary, and educational purposes and to receive, hold, invest, and administer property and to make expenditures to or for the benefit of georgia institute of technology (git) and to support its…

Education
5
Uga Real Estate Foundation Inc

The UGA Real Estate Foundation manages and improves various real estate assets for the benefit of the University of Georgia, governed by the Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia. The UGA Real Estate Foundation may also…

Philanthropy
6
Georgia Southern University Foundation Inc

The Georgia Southern University Foundation, Inc. was created to raise private funding to meet certain educational and institutional needs at Georgia Southern University not addressed by state allocations. The Foundation's primary mission…

Education
7
Georgia Engineering Foundation Inc

The georgia engineering foundation (gef) is dedicated to fostering the integrity and advancement of the engineering profession. its core purposes include providing scholarships for college students in approved engineering and engineering…

Science & Tech
8
The Global Center for Medical Innov

To facilitate, promote, structure, and coordinate collaborative scientific reseach and development of intellectual property focusing on public health needs.

Health
9
Georgia Tech Foundation Funding Corporation

To assist the georgia tech foundation in the acquisition of real estate or other projects for the support of the georgia tech institute of technology

—
10
Georgia Softgoods Education Foundation
Education
11
Georgia Tech Applied Research Corporation

The georgia tech applied research corporation (gtarc) is organized and operated to support the research activities of the georgia institute of technology in the areas of innovative research, technical assistance and economic development.

Health
12
Institute for Georgia Environmental Leadership

Through rigorous immersive educational experiences help equip Georgia leaders with the environmental knowledge, perspectives, and relationships they need to lead our state for decades to come.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgia Tech Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Goizueta Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $910,000 · EducationGEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INCKENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $405,500 · EducationKENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC+1 more: $5,000 · EducationIndividual grant recipient: $504,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBIRLA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY & SCIENCE: $250,000 · OtherBIRLA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY & SCIENCECASA GENERALIZIA ORDINE SSMO SALVATORE: $110,000 · OtherCASA GENERALIZIA ORDINE SSMO SALVATORESHAKTHIDHAMA: $84,450 · OtherSHAKTHIDHAMASHAKTHIHAMA: $81,650 · OtherSHAKTHIHAMASOCIETY OF SISTERS: $70,000 · OtherSOCIETY OF SISTERSELON FOUNDATION: $60,000 · Other+3 more: $32,000 · OtherSewa International Inc: $239,501 · Human ServicesSewa Inte…TIE-Atlanta Foundation Inc: $110,515 · PhilanthropyHIMALAYAN CHILDREN'S CHARITIES: $27,500 · PhilanthropyTHE GOIZUETA FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropySHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyACCESS GEORGIA FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Public BenefitSPRUILL CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureATLANTA CEO COUNCIL INC DBA ATLANTA CEO COUNCIL: $5,000 · Community ImprovementAtlanta Humane Society & Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc: $1,000 · Animals
Education$1,320,500Other$1,192,800Human Services$239,501Philanthropy$173,015Public Benefit$25,000Arts & Culture$10,000Community Improvement$5,000Animals$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $910,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetKENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $405,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSewa International Inc: $239,501 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetTIE-Atlanta Foundation Inc: $110,515 over 8y, 31% of budgetHIMALAYAN CHILDREN'S CHARITIES: $27,500 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetACCESS GEORGIA FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 89% of budgetSPRUILL CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetATLANTA CEO COUNCIL INC DBA ATLANTA CEO COUNCIL: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetEmory University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAtlanta Humane Society & Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Sewa International Inc ↗
  • Who funds TIE-Atlanta Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds HIMALAYAN CHILDREN'S CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS GEORGIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GOIZUETA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SPRUILL CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTA CEO COUNCIL INC DBA ATLANTA CEO COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds Atlanta Humane Society & Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mookerji Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mookerji Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mookerji’s filings →

    More from the funding graph