Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

Montana · Public charity

Montana 4-H Foundation Inc

To help 4-h youth by raising private funds, managing financial resources and partnering with the montana state university extension service to fund educational opportunities for montana 4-h youth, volunteer leaders and staff.

$127k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
2
Itemized grants FY2024
3
Organizations funded FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$71k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$43,240
Largest grant, FY2024
$43,240
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$5.0M
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$87kEducation$58kYouth Development$7k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2023 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Montana State University$86,7633n/a
Northeast Montana Threshers$58,0003n/a

Plus 1 recipient with no EIN on record ($7k), not named here.

Compare Montana 4-H Foundation Inc with peer funders

About Montana 4-H Foundation Inc

How much does Montana 4-H Foundation Inc give?
Montana 4-H Foundation Inc reported 2 itemized grants totaling $71,240, out of $126,960 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing.
What does Montana 4-H Foundation Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2023 to FY2024, its largest causes are Food & Nutrition (57%), Education (38%), Youth Development (5%).
Who are Montana 4-H Foundation Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2023 to FY2024: Montana State University ($87k), Northeast Montana Threshers ($58k).
Where is Montana 4-H Foundation Inc based?
Montana 4-H Foundation Inc is based in MT.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 3 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $138k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Montana 4-H’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home