Skip to content

· Public charity

Monroe County Industrial Development Corporation

The MONROE COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (mcidc) fosters economic growth and opportunity by providing access to capital, including microlending, to support small businesses, entrepreneurs, established employers, and not-for-profit organizations.

$470k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$62k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Employment$772kArts & Culture$239kHousing & Shelter$220kCommunity Improvement$160kScience & Tech$160kHuman Services$146kEducation$120kEnvironment$108kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 25 grants below total $443,616, the rows itemized in this filing. The $469,924 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $26,308 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $101k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $181k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $162k
$9,193
Median grant
1
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREATER ROCHESTER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$61,500
CAMP HARD HAT INC$50,000
GREATER ROCHESTER ENTERPRISE$50,000
ROCHESTER MUSEUM & SCIENCE CENTER$45,500
MONROE 2 - ORLEANS BOCES$35,140
MONROE #1 BOCES$23,676
MCQUILLEN MANUFACTURING LLC$17,431
GOLF PRODUCTS WIRE EDM INC$15,786
MONSEES TOOL & DIE INC$12,676
SWBR ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PC$11,118
VAN HOOK SERVICE CO INC$10,161
ROCHESTER TECHNOLOGY & MANUFACTURING ASSOCIATION$10,000
CATPRINTCOM LLC$9,193
IMMEDIATE MAILING SERVICES INC$9,119
VARGAS FINANCIAL SERVICES$8,750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%XLI MANUFACTURING LLC: $38k → 14%XLI MANUFACTURING LLC: $28k → 14%BIRCHCREST TREE AND LANDSCAPE: $20k → 14%XLI MANUFACTURING LLC: $15k → 14%MICRO INSTRUMENT CORP: $14k → 14%AURORA MACHINE & MFG INC: $18k → 14%EG INDUSTRIES: $12k → 14%AURORA MACHINE & MFG INC: $15k → 14%ACTION TOWING OF ROCHESTER INC: $14k → 14%UPSTATE ROOFING & PAINTING INC: $13k → 14%TURNER UNDERGROUND INSTALLATIONS INC: $13k → 14%MONSEES TOOL & DIE INC: $13k → 14%UPSTATE ROOFING & PAINTING INC: $13k → 14%AURORA MACHINE & MFG INC: $12k → 14%UNEARTHLY MATERIALS INC: $16k → 14%ZIP PRODUCTS INC: $13k → 14%VAN HOOK SERVICE CO INC: $24k → 14%NORDON INC: $19k → 14%MCQUILLEN MANUFACTURING LLC: $17k → 14%AURORA MACHINE & MFG INC: $17k → 14%MONROE 2 - ORLEANS BOCES: $35k → 14%CAT PRINTCOM LLC: $15k → 14%MONSEES TOOL & DIE INC: $20k → 14%JAM INDUSTRIES INC: $36k → 14%JAM INDUSTRIES INC: $29k → 14%JAM INDUSTRIES INC: $22k → 14%ADVANTECH INDUSTRIES INC: $19k → 14%GOLF PRODUCTS WIRE EDM INC: $16k → 14%ELITE TURNING & MACHINING CORP: $15k → 14%MCM NATURAL STONE INC: $14k → 14%CRANE DENTAL LABORATORY INC: $14k → 14%NORHTERN AIR SYSTEMS INC: $12k → 14%JAM INDUSTRIES INC: $12k → 14%PRECISE TOOL & MANUFACTURING INC: $12k → 14%VILLAGER CONSTRUCTION INC: $28k → 14%MONROE #1 BOCES: $24k → 14%CORNING TROPEL: $15k → 14%VILLAGER CONSTRUCTION INC: $14k → 14%VILLAGER CONSTRUCTION INC: $13k → 14%CATPRINTCOM LLC: $12k → 14%TURNER UNDERGROUND INSTALLATIONS INC: $15k → 14%ROCHESTER MUSEUM & SCIENCE CENTER: $46k → 14%STUDCO BUILDING SYSTEMS: $15k → 14%PLUG POWER: $20k → 14%GREATER ROCHESTER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $62k → 14%GREATER ROCHESTER ENTERPRISE: $50k → 14%RADIO SOCIAL LLC: $13k → 14%CAMP HARD HAT INC: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 40 repeat orgs$808k to everyone else

40 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 30 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
52

Total granted

$1.3M
$458k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $349k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JI
    JAM INDUSTRIES INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $111k
  • XM
    XLI MANUFACTURING LLC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $99k
  • AM
    AURORA MACHINE & MFG INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $84k

Funded once

  • PP
    PLUG POWER
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • NI
    NORDON INC
    one grant, 2020 · $19k
  • AI
    ADVANTECH INDUSTRIES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $19k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 107 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
3/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JAM INDUSTRIES INC: $111,200 · OtherJAM INDUSTRIES INCXLI MANUFACTURING LLC: $99,253 · OtherAURORA MACHINE & MFG INC: $83,646 · OtherVILLAGER CONSTRUCTION INC: $78,773 · OtherCAT PRINTCOM LLC: $71,438 · Other+98 more: $1,475,799 · Other+98 moreGREATER ROCHESTER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION INC: $61,500 · EducationMONROE 1 BOCES EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $23,676 · EducationGREATER ROCHESTER ENTERPRISE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Community ImprovementROCHESTER MUSEUM & SCIENCE CENTER: $45,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,920,109Education$85,176Community Improvement$50,000Arts & Culture$45,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREATER ROCHESTER ENTERPRISE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetROCHESTER MUSEUM & SCIENCE CENTER: $45,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREATER ROCHESTER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER ROCHESTER ENTERPRISE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCHESTER MUSEUM & SCIENCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MONROE 1 BOCES EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Rochesterworks IncNY19.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rochesterworks Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Monroe County Industrial Development Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Monroe County Industrial Development Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 107 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Monroe County Industrial Development’s filings →

    More from the funding graph