Loading…
· Private foundation
MOELLER FOUNDATION INC
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$108k
Granted FY2024
8
Grants
4
Communities
$26k
Largest
01What you fund
0172% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Education$400kHealth$70kCrime & Legal$42kHousing & Shelter$40kReligion$31kCivil Rights$21kAnimals$10kOther$233k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
children
2019
—
2020
—
2021
—
2022
—
2023
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 8 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $14k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $94k
$12,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
- 10000 DEGREES$26,000
- EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY ACTION FUND$20,000
- AGE AFRICA$16,000
- WBUR$12,000
- HEADSUP SAN RAFAEL PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION$10,000
- CANAL ALLIANCE$10,000
- AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION$8,000
- TEACH FOR AMERICA$6,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 12%. 45% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$828k · 16 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else
16 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
16
2
Total granted
$828k
$18k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+71%
+138%
Still filing today
56%
100%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
EducationHealthCrime & LegalAnimalsHousing & ShelterReligionOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- 1D10000 DEGREES8× · 2017–2024 · $371k · revenue +74%
- RPROSIE'S PLACE5× · 2019–2023 · $40k · revenue +71%
AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION5× · 2020–2024 · $40k · revenue +32%
Funded once
- TMTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +138%
- FFFOUNDATION FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCHone grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue -34%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Americans for Medical Progress
Safeguarding animal-based biomedical research that benefits people, animals & society.
Arts & Culture
2
Aclu Foundation of Massachusetts Inc
Aclu foundation of ma was established to defend freedoms guaranteed in the constitution and bill of rights through public education and litigation.
Civil Rights
3
Afp Foundation for Philanthropy
Our mission is to advance philanthropic investment and impact in the nonprofit sector.we accomplish this by:- serving as a catalyst for the nonprofit sector to address the sector's greatest issues - acting as a convener between the…
—
4
Foreign Policy Research Institute
Highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on u.s. foreign policy
International
5
Federation of State Medical Boards of
Leader in medical regulation, serving as an innovative catalyst for effective policy & standards.
Health
6
United States Endowment for Forestry
To advance positive change for the nation's working forests and forest-reliant communities
Environment
7
Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International
A people-centered approach to the conservation of gorillas and their habitats in Africa
—
8
American Gas Association
American gas association (the association) is an advocate for natural gas utility companies and their customers. the association helps natural gas utilities achieve operational excellence in the safe, reliable and efficient delivery of…
—
9
Marin Humane Society
Improving the lives of animals and people through advocacy, education, and support.
Animals
10
Silicon Schools Fund Inc
Support the launch of excellent new schools and innovative practices that improve education.
Education
11
Global Fund for Children
To advance the rights and opportunities of children and youth worldwide.
Arts & Culture
12
Mit Free Speech Alliance
To promote free expression, academic freedom, viewpoint diversity, and open scientific inquiry in the MIT community
Civil Rights
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Foundation for Suicide and the most unlike its peers is Foundation for Biomedical Research. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Education$400,000Other$233,000Health$69,500Crime & Legal$42,000Housing & Shelter$40,000Religion$30,500Civil Rights$21,000Animals$10,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds 10000 DEGREES ↗
- Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY ACTION FUND ↗
- Who funds ROSIE'S PLACE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION ↗
- Who funds CANAL ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH & STATE ↗
- Who funds TEACH FOR AMERICA ↗
- Who funds STRATEGIES FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds THE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation MOELLER FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
- Rosie's Place Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: STRATEGIES FOR CHILDREN.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~40 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.8× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 043551406 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on STRATEGIES FOR CHILDREN, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 40 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 2% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Moeller Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Moeller Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines