Skip to content
Moapa Valley Educational Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Moapa Valley Educational Foundation

Mvef facilitates the funding of innovative educational programs andadvances community support through endowments, scholarships, grants,and specialized programs.

$95k
Granted FY2022
5
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$82k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2022.

Education$196kHealth$21k
02FY2022 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k4 grants · $13k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $82k
$4,628
Median grant
3
States reached
$181k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOAPA VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL$81,600
Individual grant recipient$4,971
PACT COALITION FOR SAGE DRUG-FREE$4,628
FIGHT THE NEW DRUG$3,243
GRANT BOWLER5TH GRADE ESSAY CONTEST$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 31% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BYU-IDAHO: $5k → 22%MANHATAN COLLEGE: $5k → 28%FIGHT THE NEW DRUG: $3k → 8%WEBER STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 9%DIXIE STATE UNIVERSITY: $12k → 10%SOUTHERN UTAH UNIVERSITY: $15k → 13%SNOW COLLEGE: $2k → 15%MOAPA VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL: $82k → 12%BIG BEND COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1k → 14%BOARD OF REGENTS: $2k → 10%GRANT BOWLER5TH GRADE ESSAY CONTEST: $100 → 13%FIGHT THE NEW DRUG: $850 → 8%DIXIE TECH: $5k → 10%MVHS SCHOLARSHIPS: $36k → 12%GRANT BOWLER5TH GRADE ESSAY CONTEST: $100 → 13%EASTERN WASHINGTON: $4k → 12%CEAB ACTIVITIES: $5k → 13%CEAB ACTIVITIES: $505 → 13%PACT COALITION FOR SAGE DRUG-FREE: $5k → 13%MENTAL HEALTH FAIR: $16k → 13%MOAPA VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL: $6k → 13%MOAPA VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL: $6k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$104k · 4 repeat orgs$113k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
13

Total granted

$104k
$108k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-41%
-2%

Still filing today

25%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MV
    MOAPA VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL
    3× · 2020–2022 · $94k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2021–2022 · $5k
  • FT
    Fight the New Drug Inc
    2× · 2021–2022 · $4k · revenue -41%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $36k
  • MH
    MENTAL HEALTH FAIR
    one grant, 2021 · $16k
  • SU
    SOUTHERN UTAH UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/2
Grantees still filing
0/2
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MOAPA VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL: $93,930 · OtherMOAPA VALLEY HIGH SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $36,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMENTAL HEALTH FAIR: $16,447 · OtherMENTAL HEALTH FAIRSOUTHERN UTAH UNIVERSITY: $14,500 · OtherSOUTHERN UTAH UNIVERSITYDIXIE STATE UNIVERSITY: $12,000 · OtherDIXIE STATE UNIVERSITY+11 more: $34,804 · Other+11 moreManhattan University: $4,500 · EducationFight the New Drug Inc: $4,093 · Health
Other$208,081Education$4,500Health$4,093

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetManhattan University: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFight the New Drug Inc: $4,093 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Manhattan University ↗
  • Who funds Fight the New Drug Inc ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Moapa Valley Educational Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Moapa Valley Educational Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Moapa Valley Educational Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Moapa Valley Educational Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $102k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Moapa Valley Educational’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home