Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mkz Charity Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$171k
Granted FY2024still arriving
62
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$607kHuman Services$228kEducation$18kHealth$14kFood & Nutrition$4kInternational$4kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kPublic Benefit$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 62 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k57 grants · $65k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $105k
$380
Median grant
3
States reached
$268k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED TALMUDICAL ACADEMY$31,123
Individual grant recipient$26,450
CONG SHAAR HAMELECH INC$20,900
Individual grant recipient$15,000
YESHIVA DARKEI EMUNAH$11,950
YESHIVA CHESHKAS HATORAH$7,150
Individual grant recipient$6,100
CONG ENKAS USIR INC$6,000
Individual grant recipient$5,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
CONGREGATION ADAS YEREIM$5,000
CONGREGATION BOROV INC$5,000
BIKUR CHOLIM OF PUPA INC$2,425
BEIT NEGBA CHABAD CONG$2,400
VARIOUS 501 (C)(3)$2,366
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HILLEL OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC: $250 → 14%CHAIM MEDICAL RESOURCE: $36 → 14%OORAH INC: $100 → 11%OORAH INC: $50 → 11%OORAH INC: $50 → 11%A TIME: $440 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $1k → 20%A TIME: $98 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $1k → 20%BONEI OLAM INC: $1k → 20%BONEI OLAM INC: $585 → 20%MENUCHA CHESED SERVICES CORP: $50 → 20%BONEI OLAM INC: $495 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $125 → 20%KIMPATORIN AID: $36 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $112 → 20%ASHREINU INC: $28 → 20%ASHREINU INC: $25 → 20%NACHZIK CHAZAK INC: $150 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$723k · 74 repeat orgs$268k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

74 repeat relationships: 34 still active in FY2024, 40 since wound down; 28 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

74
133

Total granted

$723k
$220k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+15%

Still filing today

28%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BO
    Bonei Olam Inc
    7× · 2018–2024 · $5k · revenue +195%
  • MS
    MOSDOS SANZ OF MONSEY
    3× · 2021–2024 · $4k · revenue +19%
  • SO
    SHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247
    6× · 2019–2024 · $4k · revenue +251%

Funded once

  • CD
    CONGREGATION DARCHEI TORAH
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • CA
    CONGREGATION AHAVS TZEDAKA VECHESED
    one grant, 2018 · $24k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
2
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
3
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
4
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
5
Chevras Shabbos Kodesh Podcast Fellowship
Religion
6
Zichron Meshilem Feish Inc

Provides finacial assistance to needy individuals and to religious, charitable organizations

—
7
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
8
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
9
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Nefesh Chaim Inc
Religion
11
Keren Avraham Shmuel Inc Wachman
Philanthropy
12
Zocher Chasdai Ovos

Jewish Observance of Shabbos, Chagim, Torah Learning

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chaim Medical Resource Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mk Charity Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

57 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 57 of the 235 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
50/57
Grantees still filing
37/57
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED TALMUDICAL ACADEMY: $153,047 · OtherUNITED TALMUDICAL ACADEMYYESHIVA DARKEI EMUNAH: $119,365 · OtherYESHIVA DARKEI EMUNAHCONGREGATION BOROV INC: $51,000 · OtherCONGREGATION BOROV INCCONGREGATION DARCHEI TORAH: $50,000 · OtherCONGREGATION BEIS MEDRESH TOISFES Y: $47,860 · OtherYESHIVA CHESHKAS HATORAH: $37,970 · OtherYESHIVA DARKEI EMUNAH MUNKATCH: $31,826 · Other+160 more: $459,646 · Other+160 moreSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $3,554 · Food & NutritionM & S KOLEL GROCERY: $3,000 · Food & NutritionReb Shayalas Kitchen: $1,360 · Food & NutritionTOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC: $1,000 · Food & NutritionGMACH HATZOLOH OF ROCKLAND COUNTY: $2,698 · PhilanthropyCHASDEI YAKOV FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropyKOLLEL LOMDEI RETZIFUS INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropyMK CHARITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,150 · PhilanthropyROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $462 · Philanthropy+3 more: $254 · PhilanthropyMOSDOS SANZ OF MONSEY: $3,946 · EducationKOCHVEI OHR INC: $1,500 · EducationASHIRA PROGRAM INC: $1,200 · EducationBEER YESHAYA CHEDER BEER YESHAYA: $410 · EducationKOCHAVIM INC: $280 · Education+2 more: $330 · EducationBonei Olam Inc: $4,612 · Human ServicesA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $538 · Human ServicesHILLEL OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC: $250 · Human ServicesOORAH INC: $200 · Human Services+3 more: $253 · Human ServicesKOL HANEARIM INC: $3,500 · InternationalEZER MIZION: $544 · InternationalKESHER NAFSHI INC: $1,880 · HealthAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BLEV ECHAD INC: $1,500 · HealthKAPAYIM INC: $350 · HealthCHAI LIFELINE INC: $179 · Health+1 more: $100 · Health
Other$950,714Food & Nutrition$8,914Philanthropy$8,564Education$7,666Human Services$5,853International$4,044Health$4,009

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBonei Olam Inc: $4,612 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMOSDOS SANZ OF MONSEY: $3,946 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $3,554 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKOL HANEARIM INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSOD HAADAM: $3,236 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetM & S KOLEL GROCERY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGMACH HATZOLOH OF ROCKLAND COUNTY: $2,698 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetVYAZREIM INC: $2,002 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHASDEI YAKOV FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetKOLLEL LOMDEI RETZIFUS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetKESHER NAFSHI INC: $1,880 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKOCHVEI OHR INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetReb Shayalas Kitchen: $1,360 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetASHIRA PROGRAM INC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMK CHARITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,150 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $812 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHAVIVIM INC: $800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLechu Vnelcha Inc: $575 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEZER MIZION: $544 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $538 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $462 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTorahAnytimeCom Inc: $410 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBEER YESHAYA CHEDER BEER YESHAYA: $410 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKAPAYIM INC: $350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMIKVAH USA INC: $322 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKOCHAVIM INC: $280 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA TALPIOT INC: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOHR NAAVA: $212 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOORAH INC: $200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $179 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNACHZIK CHAZAK INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS HELP FRIENDS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL TZEDAKAH INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KUPAT HA'IR: $86 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA SHAAREI ARAZIM: $80 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FLATBUSH COMMUNITY FUND INC co BERNATH & ROSENBERG PC: $54 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAshreinu Inc: $53 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMENUCHA CHESED SERVICES CORP: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Bonei Olam Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY92.3× affinity99 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · The Lexicon Foundation Inc · Mk Charity Foundation Inc · The Gds Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Igcf Inc · Greenzweig Family Foundation · American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation · The Schwartz Charitable Foundation Inc · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · Zelig and Rifky Weiss Family Foundation Inc · Vyazreim Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mkz Charity Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mkz Charity Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Kochvei Ohr Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Oorah Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mkz Charity Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Mkz Charity Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 235 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mkz Charity’s filings →

More from the funding graph