Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mk2 Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$99k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$280kHealth$105kArts & Culture$97kReligion$39kEmployment$30kEnvironment$19kHousing & Shelter$3k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESTMINSTER SCHOOL$50,000
SCENIC HOUSTON$10,000
BRYD HIGH SCHOOL$5,200
HOUSTON BOTANICAL GARDENS$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN$5,000
DRESS FOR SUCCESS$5,000
RIVER OAKS BAPTIST CHURCH$5,000
EPISCOPAL HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
FERNBANK MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SCENIC TEXAS: $5k → 10%BROOKWOOD: $10k → 14%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $5k → 16%SEASIDE CHAPEL: $1k → 11%MARION MILITARY INSTITUTE: $25k → 36%CHEROKEE EMPLOYEE SCHOLARSHIP: $5k → 13%FERNBANK MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $1k → 14%BRYD HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 22%BROOKWOOD: $10k → 14%FIRST PREBYTERIAN CHURCH: $5k → 16%PEACHTREE PRESBYTERIAN: $3k → 13%FERNBANK MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $1k → 14%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $5k → 16%ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDENS: $9k → 13%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $5k → 16%WESTMINSTER SCHOOL: $50k → 13%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN: $5k → 16%WESTMINSTER SCHOOL: $50k → 13%RIVER OAKS BAPTIST CHURCH: $5k → 16%WESTMINSTER SCHOOL: $50k → 13%RIVER OAKS BAPTIST CHURCH: $3k → 16%WESTMINSTER SCHOOL: $30k → 13%RIVER OAKS BAPTIST SCHOOL: $10k → 16%WESTMINSTER SCHOOL: $30k → 13%TEXAS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $50k → 16%WESTMINSTER SCHOOL: $10k → 13%TEXAS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $20k → 16%TEXAS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $10k → 16%MENIL COLLECTION: $2k → 16%TEXAS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $5k → 16%EPISCOPAL HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 16%EPISCOPAL HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 16%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $2k → 16%HOUSTON BOTANICAL GARDENS: $5k → 16%NORA'S HOUSE: $3k → 16%SCENIC HOUSTON: $18k → 16%SCENIC HOUSTON: $15k → 16%DRESS FOR SUCCESS: $10k → 16%SCENIC HOUSTON: $10k → 16%SCENIC HOUSTON: $10k → 16%SCENIC HOUSTON: $10k → 16%SCENIC HOUSTON: $10k → 16%SCENIC HOUSTON: $10k → 16%SCENIC HOUSTON: $10k → 16%DRESS FOR SUCCESS: $5k → 16%DRESS FOR SUCCESS: $5k → 16%DRESS FOR SUCCESS: $5k → 16%DRESS FOR SUCCESS: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$487k · 9 repeat orgs$85k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
9

Total granted

$487k
$62k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+103%

Still filing today

44%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TW
    The Westminster Schools Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $220k · revenue +22%
  • SH
    SCENIC HOUSTON INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $93k · revenue -67%
  • TC
    Texas Children's Hospital
    3× · 2018–2024 · $85k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • MM
    MARION MILITARY INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • RO
    RIVER OAKS BAPTIST SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • TA
    THE ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDEN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $9k · revenue +155%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Westminster Schools Inc: $219,726 · EducationThe Westminster Schools IncDRESS FOR SUCCESS: $30,000 · OtherDRESS FOR SUCCESSMARION MILITARY INSTITUTE: $25,000 · OtherMARION MILITARY INSTITUTEBROOKWOOD: $20,000 · OtherBROOKWOODEPISCOPAL HIGH SCHOOL: $15,000 · OtherEPISCOPAL HIGH SCHOOLFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $15,000 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHRIVER OAKS BAPTIST SCHOOL: $10,000 · OtherRIVER OAKS BAPTIST SCHOOLRIVER OAKS BAPTIST CHURCH: $8,000 · Other+10 more: $38,700 · Other+10 moreSCENIC HOUSTON INC: $92,500 · EnvironmentSCENIC HOUSTON INCTHE ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $9,000 · EnvironmentTHE ATLANTA BOTANICA…Texas Children's Hospital: $85,000 · HealthTexas Children's…Fernbank Inc: $2,000 · Arts & CultureMenil Foundation Inc: $2,000 · Arts & Culture
Education$219,726Other$161,700Environment$101,500Health$85,000Arts & Culture$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Westminster Schools Inc: $219,726 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSCENIC HOUSTON INC: $92,500 over 8y, 4.3% of budgetTexas Children's Hospital: $85,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCENIC TEXAS: $5,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetFernbank Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMenil Foundation Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Westminster Schools Inc ↗
  • Who funds SCENIC HOUSTON INC ↗
  • Who funds Texas Children's Hospital ↗
  • Who funds THE ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds SCENIC TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds Fernbank Inc ↗
  • Who funds Menil Foundation Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Greater Houston Community FoundationTX13× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mk2 Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mk2 Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mk2’s filings →

    More from the funding graph