Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

Missouri · Public charity

Missouri Organic Association

MISSOURI ORGANIC ASSOCIATION was founded in 1993 by the organic farming community of missouri. Through educational opportunities and outreach, we work to advise and support organic growers, producers, and to help create a more ecologically sound food environment for all.

$768k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
4
Grants FY2024
3
Organizations funded FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$74,488
Largest grant, FY2024
$611,774
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$1.2M
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Environment$906kCommunity Improvement$74kFood & Nutrition$59kEducation$47kScience & Tech$30k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2023 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Carboncycle LLC$883,8262n/a
Missouri State University$74,4881n/a
Five Star Family Farms$59,1951n/a
Lincoln University$47,3901n/a
Seidel Research and Development Company LLC$30,0001n/a
Green Tribes Consulting LLC$22,0001n/a

Compare Missouri Organic Association with peer funders

About Missouri Organic Association

How much does Missouri Organic Association give?
Missouri Organic Association reported 4 grants totaling $767,996 in its FY2024 IRS filing.
What does Missouri Organic Association fund?
By grant dollars over FY2023 to FY2024, its largest causes are Environment (81%), Community Improvement (7%), Food & Nutrition (5%).
Who are Missouri Organic Association's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2023 to FY2024: Carboncycle LLC ($884k), Missouri State University ($74k), Five Star Family Farms ($59k).
Where is Missouri Organic Association based?
Missouri Organic Association is based in MO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Missouri Organic Association’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home