Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mission West Foundation

STUDY AND PROMOTION OF BUDDHISM.

$165k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$153k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Religion$378kHealth$71kInternational$50kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kCrime & Legal$500
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $13k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $153k
$6,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOI TU THIEN PHO HIEN$152,500
ST JUDE MEDICAL CENTER$6,000
OPERATION SMILE$6,000
OPEN ARMS VIETNAM$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 24% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%INTERNATIONAL BUDDHIST EDUCATION CENTER: $200 → 10%HOI TU THIEN PHO HIEN: $153k → 10%BANK OF AMERICA - DIRECT RELIEF: $2k → 14%TU VIEN BO DE: $20k → 18%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $3k → 17%DREPUNG LOSELING INSTITUTE OF TEXAS: $25k → 16%GLOBAL GIVING: $29k → 14%ST JUDE MEDICAL CENTER: $6k → 17%ST MATTHEW'S PARISH: $10k → 9%OPREATION SMILE: $11k → 10%CHUA PHO HIEN TEMPLE: $53k → 10%GLOBAL GIVING: $3k → 14%ST JUDE MEDICAL CENTER: $5k → 17%VIETNAMESE MARTYRS PARISH: $20k → 9%OPERATION SMILE: $8k → 10%CHUA PHO HIEN TEMPLE: $42k → 10%ST JUDE MEDICAL CENTER: $5k → 17%OPERATION SMILE: $7k → 10%HOI TU THIEN PHO HIEN: $17k → 10%ST JUDE MEDICAL CENTER: $5k → 17%OPERATION SMILE: $7k → 10%PHUNTSOK KUNCHAB BUDDHIST TEMPLE: $1k → 10%ST JUDE MEDICAL CENTER: $5k → 17%OPERATION SMILE: $6k → 10%OPEN ARMS VIETNAM: $500 → 10%ST JUDE MEDICAL CENTER: $4k → 17%OPERATION SMILE: $4k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of Mission West Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Mission West Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 15% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$382k · 7 repeat orgs$119k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against -2% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
11

Total granted

$382k
$119k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
-2%

Still filing today

43%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalReligionHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HT
    HOI TU THIEN PHO HIEN
    2× · 2020–2024 · $170k
  • CP
    CHUA PHO HIEN TEMPLE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $95k
  • OS
    OPERATION SMILE INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $43k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • DL
    DREPUNG LOSELING INSTITUTE OF TEXAS
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -53%
  • BD
    BO DE MONASTERYgraduated
    2× · 2019–2020 · $20k · revenue +235%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Buddhist Education Foundation
Education
2
The Institute of Buddha Dhamma Studies a Non Profit Corporation
Philanthropy
3
Chan Lu Lan Ruo Buddist Temple

Study and advancement of Buddhism religion

Religion
4
Alliance for International Medicine

Provided medical training to healthcare provides in selected markets throughout the world.

Health
5
Lovingkindness Vietnam

Humanitarian aid for orphanages.

International
6
United Buddhist Foundation

1. Our website is continually updated with modern technology and provides tools to support Buddhist study and research. All of our sutra translations are freely accessible to anyone with an internet connection. 2. The Buddhist books for…

Religion
7
The Vietnamese Buddhist Congregation

Buddhist temple used for various religious services

—
8
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
9
Universal Virtue Buddhist Charities

Provide monetary support to disadvantage people in vietnam and other country

Philanthropy
10
Paramita Buddhist Monastery

To promote Buddhist spiritual growth and cultural preservation through religious services, while providing global humanitarian aid, emergency disaster relief, and educational support to underserved communities.

Religion
11
Dmi Charity Foundation

To raise funds and assist the poor and needy in vietnam, especially those without financial means for medical cares.

International
12
Vision International Alliance

Egypt Church and Pastors aid, Mongolia ministry helping students, US church and pastoral care and prayer ministry

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bo De Monastery; the most unlike its peers is Hopetoday. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOI TU THIEN PHO HIEN: $169,500 · OtherHOI TU THIEN PHO HIENCHUA PHO HIEN TEMPLE: $94,750 · OtherCHUA PHO HIEN TEMPLEIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST JUDE MEDICAL CENTER: $18,800 · OtherGADEN SHARTSE NORLING COLLEGE: $15,000 · Other+5 more: $16,000 · OtherOPERATION SMILE INC: $42,500 · InternationalOPERATION SMILE I…GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $31,800 · InternationalGLOBALGIVING FOUN…International Rescue Committee INC: $3,000 · InternationalDREPUNG LOSELING INSTITUTE OF TEXAS: $25,000 · ReligionDREPUNG LO…BO DE MONASTERY: $20,000 · ReligionBO DE MONA…+1 more: $200 · ReligionHOPETODAY: $15,000 · Human ServicesST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $9,200 · Health
Other$354,050International$77,300Religion$45,200Human Services$15,000Health$9,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $42,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $31,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDREPUNG LOSELING INSTITUTE OF TEXAS: $25,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetBO DE MONASTERY: $20,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetHOPETODAY: $15,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $9,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DREPUNG LOSELING INSTITUTE OF TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds BO DE MONASTERY ↗
  • Who funds HOPETODAY ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL BUDDHIST EDUCATION CENTER ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mission West Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mission West Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mission West Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Mission West Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mission West’s filings →

    More from the funding graph