Skip to content
Mission Housing Development Corporation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Mission Housing Development Corporation

To provide affordable housing to low-income families, the handicapped and elderly.

$43k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$501kCommunity Improvement$47kEmployment$10k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $10,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $43,315 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $32,815 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$75M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Non-Profit Housing Assoc of Northern California$10,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Non-Profit Housing Assoc of Northern California: $11k → 10%NON-PROFIT HSG ASSOC OF N CA: $6k → 10%COLOSIMO APARTMENTS INC: $399k → 10%ALTAMONT HOTEL INC: $53k → 10%CENTRO DEL PUEBLO: $47k → 10%MISSION HSG DEV PRPTY III INC: $15k → 10%SUNSET HOUSING DEV CORP: $7k → 10%SF HOUSING ACTION COALITION: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mission Housing Development Corporation

To provide affordable housing to low-income families, the handicapped and elderly.

Housing & Shelter
2
Hip Housing Development Corporation

To alleviate and improve the housing condition of the needy, physically or mentally handicapped, elderly persons and others whose housing needs are not being adequately met in San Mateo County, CA.

Housing & Shelter
3
North Bay Human Development Corporation

Own and operate a low-income housing project

Housing & Shelter
4
Solano Affordable Housing Foundation
Housing & Shelter
5
San Francisco Association of Realtors Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Pacific Housing Association
—
7
Homeownership San Francisco dba Home Sf

The Organization is a citywide collaborative of housing counseling agencies that helps diverse and underserved households achieve and sustain homeownership in San Francisco.

—
8
Housing Rights Committee of San Francisco Inc

The Housing Rights Committee of San Francisco is dedicated to combating the displacement crisis gripping our city by building the power of working-class tenants of color to take on the real estate industry and win housing justice for all.…

Education
9
Bay Area Housing Corporation

The primary purpose of this corporation is to provide and maintain housing opportunities for people with developmental disabilities and low income populations.

Housing & Shelter
10
Mission Housing Management Corporation

To benefit and support mission housing development corporation (mhdc), acalifornia nonprofit public benefit corporation, by providing low cost management,advisory, consulting and related real estate services for commercial propertiesowned…

Housing & Shelter
11
Mission Hiring Hall Inc

The organization combats unemployment and under employment in the mission area in san francisco, and operates a hiring hall that provides job listings and referrals to residents.job readiness training and job placement.

—
12
Habitat Community Housing Development Inc

Development of affordable housing

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colosimo Apartments Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dev Mission. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLOSIMO APARTMENTS INC: $399,339 · Housing & ShelterCOLOSIMO APARTMENTS INCNON-PROFIT HOUSING ASSOCIATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $16,500 · Housing & Shelter+3 more: $31,829 · Housing & Shelter+3 moreALTAMONT HOTEL INC: $53,151 · Crime & LegalALTAMONT H…CENTRO DEL PUEBLO: $47,396 · OtherCENTRO DE…DEV MISSION: $10,000 · Youth Development
Housing & Shelter$447,668Crime & Legal$53,151Other$47,396Youth Development$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALTAMONT HOTEL INC: $53,151 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetCENTRO DEL PUEBLO: $47,396 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetNON-PROFIT HOUSING ASSOCIATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $16,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMISSION HOUSING DEV PROP III INC: $14,723 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetSan Francisco Housing Action Coalition: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSUNSET HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $7,106 over 1y, 100% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mission Housing Development Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mission Housing Development Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mission Housing Development Corporation?

    Find your warmest path to Mission Housing Development Corporation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mission Housing Development’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home