Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mion Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$356k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$105k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$500kReligion$354kHuman Services$350kHealth$264kInternational$103kEnvironment$94kAnimals$19k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $80k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $265k
$20,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$7.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RENAISSANCE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$105,000
EAGLE RANCH$80,000
OUR LADY OF PERPENTUAL HELP$80,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$25,000
PIEDMONT ATLANTA HOSPITAL$20,000
NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION$20,000
OCEAN CONSERVANCY$15,000
LIFE LINE ANIMAL PROJECT$5,000
PLANNED PETHOOD OF GA$4,000
GSD RESCUE OF GA$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $34k → 17%OCEAN CONSERVANCY: $29k → 14%EAGLE RANCH: $80k → 12%PIEDMONT ATLANTA HOSPITAL: $40k → 13%LIFE LINE ANIMAL PROJECT: $5k → 14%RENAISSANCE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $105k → 16%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $25k → 17%OCEAN CONSERVANCY: $25k → 14%EAGLE RANCH: $80k → 12%PIEDMONT ATLANTA HOSPITAL: $30k → 13%LIFE LINE ANIMAL PROJECT: $5k → 14%RENAISSANCE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $100k → 16%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $25k → 17%OCEAN CONSERVANCY: $15k → 14%EAGLE RANCH: $80k → 12%PIEDMONT ATLANTA HOSPITAL: $20k → 13%LIFE LINE ANIMAL PROJECT: $5k → 14%RENAISSANCE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $75k → 16%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $25k → 17%OCEAN CONSERVANCY: $15k → 14%EAGLE RANCH: $80k → 12%PIEDMONT ATLANTA HOSPITAL: $20k → 13%LIFE LINE ANIMAL PROJECT: $5k → 14%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $14k → 17%OCEAN CONSERVANCY: $15k → 14%EAGLE RANCH: $80k → 12%PIEDMONT ATLANTA HOSPITAL: $20k → 13%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GA: $4k → 14%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $5k → 17%OCEAN CONCERVANCY: $10k → 14%EAGLE RANCH: $30k → 12%PIEDMONT ATLANTA HOSPITAL: $15k → 13%PLANNED PETHOOD OF GA: $4k → 14%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR NORTHEAST GEORGIA: $285k → 13%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR NORTHEAST GEORGIA: $20k → 13%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR NORTHEAST GEORGIA: $20k → 13%OUR LADY OF PERPENTUAL HELP: $80k → 13%OUR LADY OF PERPENTUAL HELP: $80k → 13%OUR LADY OF PERPENTUAL HELP: $80k → 13%OUR LADY OF PERPENTUAL HELP: $80k → 13%OUR LADY OF PERPENTUAL HELP: $80k → 13%OUR LADY OF PERPENTUAL HELP: $30k → 13%NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION: $42k → 13%NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION: $30k → 13%NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION: $20k → 13%NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION: $20k → 13%NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION: $20k → 13%NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION: $15k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 11 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
0

Total granted

$1.4M
$0

Still filing today

45%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalEnvironmentReligionAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EAGLE RANCH INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $430k · revenue +18%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $128k · revenue +39%
  • OC
    OCEAN CONSERVANCY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $109k · revenue +45%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    7/7
    Grantees still filing
    7/7
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    OUR LADY OF PERPENTUAL HELP: $430,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF PERPENTUAL HELPNATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION: $147,000 · OtherNATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATIONPIEDMONT ATLANTA HOSPITAL: $145,000 · OtherPIEDMONT ATLANTA HOSPITAL+3 more: $21,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR NORTHEAST GEORGIA: $325,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR NORTHEAS…Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc: $280,000 · PhilanthropyRenaissance Charitable Foundation…EAGLE RANCH INC: $430,000 · HealthEAGLE RANCH INCMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $128,000 · InternationalOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $109,000 · EnvironmentLIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC: $20,000 · AnimalsWHEAT MISSION IN ATLANTA INC: $3,500 · Religion
    Other$743,500Philanthropy$605,000Health$430,000International$128,000Environment$109,000Animals$20,000Religion$3,500

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEAGLE RANCH INC: $430,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR NORTHEAST GEORGIA: $325,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetRenaissance Charitable Foundation Inc: $280,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $128,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $109,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWHEAT MISSION IN ATLANTA INC: $3,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds EAGLE RANCH INC ↗
    • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR NORTHEAST GEORGIA ↗
    • Who funds Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
    • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
    • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
    • Who funds LIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC ↗
    • Who funds WHEAT MISSION IN ATLANTA INC ↗

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Mion Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mion Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Mion Family’s filings →

      More from the funding graph