Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Mind Science Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$100k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Science & Tech$393kEducation$137kHealth$107kRecreation & Sports$45k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$528k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES$40,000
PARIS BRAIN INSTITUTE$30,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$30,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

Your US giving64% of grant dollars ($435k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 36% that went abroad ($247k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 70% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA TRUSTEES: $17k → 22%STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $32k → 8%CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $15k → 10%SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES: $40k → 11%BARD COLLEGE: $15k → 9%UNIVERISTY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO DEPT OF PHARMACOLOGY: $15k → 16%CENTER FOR SCIENCE AND LAW: $40k → 16%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $30k → 14%JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $15k → 19%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $30k → 8%CLARITY CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER: $750 → 16%CENTER FOR SCIENCE AND LAW: $40k → 16%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $15k → 14%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $30k → 8%MAYA ADAIR: $500 → 16%CENTER FOR SCIENCE AND LAW: $40k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO: $30k → 16%OLIVIA GALINZOGA: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Beyond the US36% of all-years giving ($247k)

6 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
France$75k · 3 grants
Belgium$55k · 2 grants
United Kingdom$47k · 3 grants
Netherlands$40k · 1 grant
Canada$15k · 1 grant
Australia$15k · 1 grant

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 17% of Mind Science Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Mind Science Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 36% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

35%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$212k · 3 repeat orgs$394k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
17

Total granted

$212k
$324k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+57%

Still filing today

33%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationRecreation & SportsHealthScience & TechOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CENTER FOR SCIENCE AND LAW
    3× · 2017–2019 · $120k · revenue -95% · 53% of their budget
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE
    3× · 2018–2022 · $47k
  • Northwestern University
    2× · 2018–2022 · $45k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MAASTRICHT
    one grant, 2023 · $40k
  • UD
    UNIVERSITE DE LIEGE
    one grant, 2022 · $40k
  • SU
    STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
    one grant, 2021 · $32k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
2
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
3
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
4
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
5
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
6
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
7
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
8
The Central European University

Ceu is committed to promoting the values of open society and self-reflective critical thinking. it aims at excellence in the mastery of established knowledge, courage to pursue the creation of new knowledge in the humanities, the social…

International
9
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
10
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
11
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
12
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwestern University and the most unlike its peers is Center for Science and Law. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CENTER FOR SCIENCE AND LAW — $120,000 · OtherCENTER FOR SCIENCE AND LAWUNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE — $46,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGEUNIVERSITY OF MAASTRICHT — $40,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MAASTRICHTUNIVERSITE DE LIEGE — $40,000 · OtherUNIVERSITE DE LIEGESTANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE — $31,500 · OtherSTANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINEPARIS BRAIN INSTITUTE — $30,000 · OtherPARIS BRAIN INSTITUTEUNIVERSITE DE PARIS — $30,000 · OtherUNIVERSITE DE PARISUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO — $30,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO+8 more — $91,500 · Other+8 moreTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $60,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES …Vanderbilt University — $30,000 · EducationVanderbilt UniversityTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $16,500 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVER…CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY — $15,000 · EducationCHAPMAN UNIVERSITYBARD COLLEGE — $15,000 · EducationBARD COLLEGENorthwestern University — $45,000 · Recreation & SportsThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies — $40,000 · Science & TechCLARITY CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER — $750 · Health
Other$459,500Education$136,500Recreation & Sports$45,000Science & Tech$40,000Health$750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCENTER FOR SCIENCE AND LAW — $120,000 over 3y, 53% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University — $45,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies — $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $16,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBARD COLLEGE — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLARITY CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER — $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CENTER FOR SCIENCE AND LAW
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Northwestern University
  • Who funds The Salk Institute for Biological Studies
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
  • Who funds CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds BARD COLLEGE
  • Who funds CLARITY CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mind Science Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph