Skip to content

· Public charity

Milwaukee Public Schools Foundation

To promote educational excellence and strengthen community participation in milwaukee public schools.

$1.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.0MArts & Culture$21kRecreation & Sports$5k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $108,738, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,480,520 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,371,782 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $89k
$12,588
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$49,898
MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY$13,438
Individual grant recipient$12,938
MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENG$12,588
NORTHERN IL UNIVERSITY$7,500
Individual grant recipient$6,876
MILWAUKEE AREA TECH COL$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 85% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%IOWA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $5k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - STEVENS POINT: $10k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - WHITEWATER: $12k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MADISON: $12k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - OSHKOSH: $5k → 11%WISCONSIN CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $21k → 17%NORTHERN IL UNIVERSITY: $8k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - STEVENS POINT: $6k → 10%UW-WHITEWATER: $7k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MADISON: $11k → 10%MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENG: $13k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - WHITEWATER: $6k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MADISON: $9k → 10%MILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $355k → 17%UW-MADISON: $13k → 10%CARDINAL STRITCH UNIVERSITY: $13k → 17%MILWAUKEE AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $16k → 17%MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY: $14k → 17%MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY: $13k → 17%MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY: $12k → 17%MILWAUKEE AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $12k → 17%MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 17%MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY: $9k → 17%ALVERNO COLLEGE: $8k → 17%MILWAUKEE AREA TECH COL: $6k → 17%MILWAUKEE AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $6k → 17%ALVERNO COLLEGE: $5k → 17%MILWAUKEE AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $5k → 17%UW-MILWAUKEE: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$545k · 7 repeat orgs$505k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +34% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
6

Total granted

$545k
$410k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+34%

Still filing today

29%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 12% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $95k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MILWAUKEE
    7× · 2017–2023 · $286k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MADISON
    7× · 2017–2023 · $111k
  • MU
    Marquette University
    5× · 2018–2024 · $58k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • MP
    MILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2018 · $355k
  • WISCONSIN CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $21k · revenue +34%
  • CARDINAL STRITCH UNIVERSITY INC
    one grant, 2019 · $13k · revenue -95%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mathematics Institute of Wisconsin
Education
2
University of Wisconsin - Green Bay Foundation Inc

The foundation exists to support the university of wisconsin - green bay in its quest to provide an education to all who seek one. this is done through scholarship, research support, capital acquisitions, and investing in the staff and…

Education
3
The Uwm Foundation Inc

The mission of the uwm foundation, inc. is to support the educational, literary, and scientific endeavors of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee by receiving, managing, and distributing gifts to benefit the university's students,…

Education
4
Milwaukee Institute of Art & Design Inc

The milwaukee institute of art and design's mission is to ignite curious minds through art, design and service. we value courage to seek our own path, integrity to pursue our lives and work with meaning, kindness to thoughtfully engage…

—
5
St Mary's University

To foster the formation of people in faith and educate leaders for the common good through community, education, and academic excellence. see schedule o.

—
6
The Medical College of Wisconsin Inc

The medical college of wisconsin (mcw) is a distinguished leader and innovator in the education and development of the next generation of physicians, (continued in schedule o)

Education
7
The Uwm Real Estate Foundation Inc

To partner with the public and private sectors to develop and hold real estate for the benefit of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee. the uwm real estate foundation, inc. holdings may include any properties that advance the mission of…

Housing & Shelter
8
St Marys University of Minnesota

Saint mary's university of minnesota is a private catholic institution that serves about 3,900 students annually. the university offers a comprehensive, personalized education guided by its lasallian catholic heritage. with a wide array of…

Education
9
University of Wisconsin Foundation

University of wisconsin foundation aids university of wisconsin-madison by soliciting gifts & bequests, administers & invests securities & properties, & distributes payments for the benefit of university of wisconsin - madison.

Education
10
Augsburg University

A private lutheran four-year university located in downtown minneapolis.

Education
11
Marian University Inc

Marian university is a catholic liberal arts institution of higher learning offering undergraduate, graduate, and continuing education programs with approximately 1,200 students annually.

Education
12
Saint John's University

To foster the vitality of community through learning and the pursuit of wisdom.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alverno College; the most unlike its peers is Iowa Western Community College Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
2/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $355,371 · OtherMILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLSUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MILWAUKEE: $286,082 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MILWAUKEEUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MADISON: $111,200 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MADISONIndividual grant recipient: $49,898 · OtherMILWAUKEE AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $38,500 · Other+10 more: $98,902 · Other+10 moreMarquette University: $58,288 · EducationMarquette…ALVERNO COLLEGE: $18,100 · EducationALVERNO C…CARDINAL STRITCH UNIVERSITY INC: $13,000 · EducationCARDINAL …WISCONSIN CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC INC: $21,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$939,953Education$89,388Arts & Culture$21,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMarquette University: $58,288 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWISCONSIN CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC INC: $21,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetALVERNO COLLEGE: $18,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCARDINAL STRITCH UNIVERSITY INC: $13,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Marquette University ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds ALVERNO COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CARDINAL STRITCH UNIVERSITY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Greater Milwaukee Foundation IncWI13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Milwaukee Public Schools Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Milwaukee Public Schools Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $2.7M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Milwaukee Public Schools’ filings →

    More from the funding graph