Skip to content

· Private foundation

Milwaukee Jazz Festival Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$31kArts & Culture$7kReligion$5kCommunity Improvement$5kYouth Development$3kHealth$3kCrime & Legal$1kCivil Rights$100Other$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$37k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Wisconsin Conservatory of Music$3,500
Lincoln Center of the Arts Middle S$2,500
St Rafael School$2,500
St Margaret Mary School$2,500
Bayside Middle School$1,500
Milwaukee Jazz Institute$1,125
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%St Rafael School: $3k → 17%The Better Project Awareness Inc: $1k → 17%The Better Project Awareness Inc: $1k → 17%Rufus King High School: $3k → 17%The League of Martin: $500 → 17%The League of Martin: $500 → 17%Wisconsin Conservatory of Music: $4k → 17%Lincoln Center of the Arts Middle S: $3k → 17%Bay View High School: $3k → 17%Bay View High School: $3k → 17%Bayside Middle School: $3k → 17%Bayside Middle School: $2k → 17%Milwaukee Jazz Institute: $1k → 17%Cristo Rey Jesuit High School: $3k → 17%Riverside High School: $3k → 17%Cristo Rey Jesuit High School: $3k → 17%St Matthews Church: $5k → 17%St Margaret Mary School: $3k → 17%St Margaret Mary School: $3k → 17%The Business Council Inc: $3k → 17%The Business Council Inc: $1k → 17%THE BUSINESS COUNCIL: $1k → 17%The Foundation for Heart Sciences: $2k → 17%Foundation for Heart Science: $1k → 17%NAACP: $100 → 17%JUNIOR ACHIVEMENTS: $3k → 17%Junior Achievement: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$30k · 8 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
8

Total granted

$30k
$18k

Still filing today

38%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE BUSINESS COUNCIL INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $5k · revenue +50%
  • BP
    BETTER PROJECT AWARENESS INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $2k · revenue +71%
  • TL
    The League of Martin Inc
    2× · 2021–2022 · $1k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • SM
    St Matthews Church
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • RK
    Rufus King High School
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/6
Grantees still filing
3/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

St Margaret Mary School: $5,000 · OtherSt Margaret Mary SchoolSt Matthews Church: $5,000 · OtherSt Matthews ChurchCristo Rey Jesuit High School: $5,000 · OtherCristo Rey Jesuit High SchoolBay View High School: $5,000 · OtherBay View High SchoolBayside Middle School: $4,000 · OtherBayside Middle SchoolIndividual grant recipient: $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSt Rafael School: $2,500 · OtherSt Rafael SchoolRufus King High School: $2,500 · OtherRufus King High SchoolRiverside High School: $2,500 · OtherRiverside High SchoolLincoln Center of the Arts Middle S: $2,500 · OtherLincoln Center of the Arts Middle SIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · Other+3 more: $2,350 · Other+3 moreFOUNDATION FOR HEART SCIENCE LTD: $3,000 · HealthFOUNDATIO…BETTER PROJECT AWARENESS INC: $2,000 · HealthBETTER PR…THE BUSINESS COUNCIL INC: $4,750 · PhilanthropyTHE BUSIN…WISCONSIN CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC INC: $3,500 · Arts & CultureWISCONSIN…MILWAUKEE JAZZ INSTITUTE INC: $1,125 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE…
Other$43,350Health$5,000Philanthropy$4,750Arts & Culture$4,625

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BUSINESS COUNCIL INC: $4,750 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetWISCONSIN CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR HEART SCIENCE LTD: $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBETTER PROJECT AWARENESS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetMILWAUKEE JAZZ INSTITUTE INC: $1,125 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BUSINESS COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR HEART SCIENCE LTD ↗
  • Who funds BETTER PROJECT AWARENESS INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE JAZZ INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds The League of Martin Inc ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Milwaukee Jazz Festival Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Milwaukee Jazz Festival Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Milwaukee Jazz Festival’s filings →

    More from the funding graph